全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于DenseNet多尺度融合的水下湍流鬼成像计算方法研究
Research on Underwater Turbulence Ghost Imaging Computation Method Based on DenseNet Multi-Scale Fusion

DOI: 10.12677/mos.2025.144328, PP. 771-782

Keywords: 水下湍流,鬼成像,DenseNet,多尺度融合,图像重建,深度学习,湍流建模
Underwater Turbulence
, Ghost Imaging, DenseNet, Multi-Scale Fusion, Image Reconstruction, Deep Learning, Turbulence Modeling

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

水下湍流环境对成像质量提出了严峻挑战,传统的水下成像方法在湍流影响下常常无法获得清晰图像。为了解决这一问题,本文提出了一种基于DenseNet的多尺度融合水下湍流鬼成像方法,通过深度学习优化鬼成像的图像重建精度与稳定性。与传统计算鬼成像方法(GI)及基于压缩感知的重建方法(CSGI)相比,DenseNet方法在低采样率条件下表现出明显的优势,能够在湍流干扰下恢复更为清晰和准确的图像。实验结果表明,DenseNet通过其独特的多尺度特征提取与融合能力,成功克服了湍流对光传播造成的失真与噪声,提高了图像的细节保真度和结构恢复效果。该方法不仅展示了在低采样率下的强大恢复能力,还为复杂水下环境中的成像技术提供了新的解决方案,推动了基于深度学习的水下湍流成像技术的进一步发展。
Underwater turbulence presents significant challenges to imaging quality, and traditional underwater imaging methods often fail to produce clear images under turbulent conditions. To address this issue, this paper proposes a multi-scale fusion underwater turbulence ghost imaging method based on DenseNet, which enhances the accuracy and stability of ghost imaging reconstruction through deep learning. Compared with traditional ghost imaging methods (GI) and compressed sensing-based reconstruction methods (CSGI), the DenseNet method demonstrates significant advantages under low sampling rates, enabling clearer and more accurate image restoration even in the presence of turbulence. Experimental results show that DenseNet successfully overcomes distortion and noise caused by underwater turbulence through its unique multi-scale feature extraction and fusion capabilities, improving the fidelity and structural recovery of the image details. This method not only exhibits strong recovery capabilities under low sampling rates but also provides a new solution for imaging technologies in complex underwater environments, advancing the development of deep learning-based underwater turbulence imaging technologies.

References

[1]  李斌. 海洋湍流对关联成像分辨率的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2019.
[2]  Shapiro, J.H. (2008) Computational Ghost Imaging. Physical Review A, 78, Article 061802.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.78.061802
[3]  Lyu, M., Wang, W., Wang, H., Wang, H., Li, G., Chen, N., et al. (2017) Deep-Learning-Based Ghost Imaging. Scientific Reports, 7, Article No. 17865.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18171-7
[4]  Zhu, Y. and Newsam, S. (2017) DenseNet for Dense Flow. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Beijing, 17-20 September 2017, 790-794.
https://doi.org/10.1109/icip.2017.8296389
[5]  Yang, G., Li, J., Lei, H. and Gao, X. (2024) A Multi-Scale Information Integration Framework for Infrared and Visible Image Fusion. Neurocomputing, 600, Article 128116.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128116
[6]  谌雨章, 叶婷, 程超杰, 等. 水下湍流成像退化及优化恢复研究[J]. 光电工程, 2018, 45(12): 52-62.
[7]  Ata, Y., Gökçe, M.C. and Baykal, Y. (2022) Underwater Turbulence Effect on Optical Imaging. Physica Scripta, 97, Article 055505.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ac6305
[8]  Zhang, Q., Li, W., Liu, K., Zhou, L., Wang, Z. and Gu, Y. (2019) Effect of Oceanic Turbulence on the Visibility of Underwater Ghost Imaging. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 36, 397-402.
https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.36.000397
[9]  吴修昊, 李文东, 肖芽, 等. 基于传输矩阵的水下光学成像[J]. 激光与光电子学进展, 2024, 61(22): 91-100.
[10]  Chen, Y., Sun, Z., Li, C. and Li, X. (2023) Computational Ghost Imaging in Turbulent Water Based on Self-Supervised Information Extraction Network. Optics & Laser Technology, 167, Article 109735.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.109735
[11]  Strozzi, F. and Pozzi, R. (2023) Trend and Seasonality Features Extraction with Pre-Trained CNN and Recurrence Plot. International Journal of Production Research, 62, 3251-3262.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2227903
[12]  Luo, C., Wan, W., Chen, S., Long, A., Peng, L., Wu, S., et al. (2020) High-Quality Underwater Computational Ghost Imaging with Shaped Lorentz Sources. Laser Physics Letters, 17, Article 105209.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1612-202x/abb094
[13]  Yang, C. (2025) Towards Ultra-Low-Dose CT for Detecting Pulmonary Nodules Using DenseNet. Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 48, 379-389.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-025-01520-6
[14]  Yang, M., Wang, P., Wu, Y. and Feng, G. (2024) A Ghost Imaging Framework Based on Laser Mode Speckle Pattern for Underwater Environments. Communications Engineering, 3, Article No. 52.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-024-00200-9
[15]  Erkmen, B.I. and Shapiro, J.H. (2010) Ghost Imaging: From Quantum to Classical to Computational. Advances in Optics and Photonics, 2, 405-450.
https://doi.org/10.1364/aop.2.000405
[16]  Shapiro, J.H. and Boyd, R.W. (2012) The Physics of Ghost Imaging. Quantum Information Processing, 11, 949-993.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-011-0356-5
[17]  Bromberg, Y., Katz, O. and Silberberg, Y. (2009) Ghost Imaging with a Single Detector. Physical Review A, 79, Article 053840.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.79.053840
[18]  赵明, 王钰, 田芷铭, 等. 水下推扫式计算鬼成像的方法[J]. 激光与光电子学进展, 2019, 56(16): 132-136.
[19]  Yin, M., Wang, L. and Zhao, S. (2019) Experimental Demonstration of Influence of Underwater Turbulence on Ghost Imaging. Chinese Physics B, 28, Article 094201.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ab33ee
[20]  Karplus, R. and Neuman, M. (1951) The Scattering of Light by Light. Physical Review, 83, 776-784.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.83.776
[21]  Icsevgi, A. and Lamb, W.E. (1969) Propagation of Light Pulses in a Laser Amplifier. Physical Review, 185, 517-545.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.185.517

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133