|
基于湖北省营商环境评估的惠企政策公平感影响因素研究
|
Abstract:
在公平原则的指导下,通过不断完善惠企政策保障企业营商环境是现代政府的重要职能,而有效提升地方企业对惠企政策的公平感,则是从企业主观层面改善营商环境的重要内容。本文基于湖北省企业环境评价问卷调查数据进行数据分析,以地方企业对本地区公平竞争环境总体感受和政策落实满意度作为惠企政策公平感的基准,从机会公平、程序公平、结果公平三个层面,对目前湖北省16个市州惠企政策公平感受进行多元回归和中介效应分析发现:湖北省不同维度惠企政策公平对政策公平感存在显著的正向影响,减负支持政策的公平作为结果公平还对市场准入机会公平和法律服务程序公平的影响起到中介作用。因此本文为提升政策公平感提出建议,首先优先推进市场准入公平,其次重点关注涉企案件审理公正,最后逐步优化政府购买服务透明机制,以便切实提升企业政策公平感。
Under the principle of fairness, modern governments play a crucial role in continuously refining pro-business policies to ensure an optimal business environment for enterprises. Enhancing local enterprises’ perception of fairness regarding these policies is vital for improving the business environment from the enterprises’ subjective perspective. Based on data from a questionnaire survey evaluating the business environment in Hubei Province, this paper uses the overall perception of a fair competitive environment and satisfaction with policy implementation as indicators of the sense of fairness towards pro-business policies. Through multiple regression and mediation effect analysis of the perception of fairness across 16 cities and prefectures in Hubei Province, focusing on opportunity fairness, procedural fairness, and outcome fairness, it is found that the fairness of pro-business policies in different dimensions significantly positively impacts the sense of policy fairness. Specifically, the fairness of policies aimed at reducing burdens and providing support, categorized as outcome fairness, also mediates the impact of market access opportunities and legal service procedures on the overall sense of fairness. Therefore, this paper proposes recommendations to enhance the sense of policy fairness: first, prioritize ensuring fair market access; second, emphasize the fairness in handling cases involving enterprises; and finally, gradually optimize the transparency mechanism of government procurement services to effectively enhance enterprises’ sense of policy fairness.
[1] | Tyler, T., Boeckmann, R.J., Smith, H.J. and Huo, Y.J. (1997) Social Justice in a Diverse Society. Westview Press, 3-25. |
[2] | 樊宏法. 环境公平的尺度效应与中国环境公平的尺度建构[J]. 常州大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 24(6): 76-86. |
[3] | 王宏起, 李雨晴, 李晓莉, 等. 数字创新能力对战略性新兴产业突破性创新的影响研究——环境动态性的调节作用[J]. 管理评论, 2024, 36(5): 89-100. |
[4] | Akerlof, G.A. and Yellen, J.L. (1990) The Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis and Unemployment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 255-283. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937787 |
[5] | Fizel, J., Krautmann, A.C. and Hadley, L. (2002) Equity and Arbitration in Major League Baseball. Managerial and Decision Economics, 23, 427-435. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1090 |
[6] | Cheng, B., Zhou, X., Guo, G. and Yang, K. (2020) Perceived Overqualification and Cyberloafing: A Moderated-Mediation Model Based on Equity Theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 164, 565-577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4026-8 |
[7] | 殷莉青, 李盈国. 打好服务“组合拳”推进惠企暖企政策落实落地——广东省中山市总工会落实中小微企业工会经费支持政策的做法[J]. 中国工会财会, 2020(10): 45-46. |
[8] | 安徽省财政厅. 打好政策“组合拳”减负惠企促升级[J]. 中国财政, 2024(1): 39-41. |
[9] | 吉林省人社厅失业保险处, 吉林省人社厅宣传中心. 吉林省失业保险打出惠企惠民政策“组合拳” [J]. 劳动保障世界, 2018(25): 5. |
[10] | 张斌, 何晴. 20世纪80年代以来美国产业竞争政策的演变——兼论波音、麦道合并与微软垄断案[J]. 经济评论, 2002(1): 126-128. |
[11] | 孙云鹏, 包群. 以国企改革强化竞争政策基础地位研究[J]. 理论探讨, 2023(5): 153-158. |
[12] | 董志勇, 蒋少翔, 梁银鹤. 非公经济高质量发展的制度障碍及其优化路径[J]. 新视野, 2020(6): 28-34. |
[13] | Rose, R.M. (2007) Research Committee Issues Brief: Access and Equity in Online Classes and Virtual Schools. North American Council for Online Learning. |
[14] | 左娟. 基于公平理论的饲料企业人力资源优化配置[J]. 中国饲料, 2023(24): 141-144. |
[15] | 王超, 杜明润, 陈芷怡. 促进民营经济发展政策效能提升的路径研究——以江苏省徐州市为例[J]. 江苏省社会主义学院学报, 2024, 25(1): 53-59. |
[16] | 王学男, 陈振宁. 新疆内地高中班学生的政策公平感影响因素研究[J]. 青海民族研究, 2022, 33(3): 212-218. |
[17] | 施生旭, 郭新琴. 公共服务满意度对社会公平感的影响研究——基于代际差异视角的研究[J]. 重庆社会科学, 2023(4): 77-93. |
[18] | Kollmann, J., Nath, S., Singh, S., Balasubramanian, S., Scheidegger, A. and Contzen, N. (2024) Perceived Distributive Fairness and Public Acceptance of a Policy Mandating On-Site Wastewater Treatment and Reuse. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 96, Article 102292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102292 |
[19] | Székely, M., Butterfill, S. and Michael, J. (2024) Effort-Based Decision Making in Joint Action: Evidence of a Sense of Fairness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 112, Article 104601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104601 |
[20] | 邢俊霞. 中小企业应收账款管理漏洞及对策——基于21起赊销合同逾期未收款法律纠纷案件的调查[J]. 财会通讯, 2016(29): 123-124. |
[21] | 李新成. 公平竞争审查制度对企业财务绩效影响研究[J]. 中国注册会计师, 2023(11): 61-68. |
[22] | 金善明. 公平竞争审查机制的制度检讨及路径优化[J]. 法学, 2019(12): 3-17. |
[23] | 郭冠男, 李晓琳. 市场准入负面清单管理制度与路径选择: 一个总体框架[J]. 改革, 2015(7): 28-38. |
[24] | 耿明阳, 谢雁翔, 金振, 等. 市场准入负面清单与企业全要素生产率——基于全国统一大市场建设的情境分析[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2023, 25(4): 3-17+32. |
[25] | 周志方, 韩尚杰, 程序. 市场准入管制放松与企业创新——基于“市场准入负面清单制度”试点的准自然实验[J]. 财经研究, 2023, 49(11): 125-139. |
[26] | Raja, U., Sheikh, R.A., Abbas, M. and Bouckenooghe, D. (2018) Do Procedures Really Matter When Rewards Are More Important? A Pakistani Perspective on the Effects of Distributive and Procedural Justice on Employee Behaviors. European Review of Applied Psychology, 68, 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2018.03.001 |
[27] | 田露露, 韩超, 姜春海. 环境规制与公平竞争: 理论逻辑、现实解析及协调思路——基于异质性企业的视角[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2024, 26(2): 50-64. |
[28] | 刘少军, 姜雪莹. 涉案企业合规不起诉司法审查制度的构建[J]. 学术界, 2024(1): 140-154. |
[29] | 董新宇, 鞠逸飞. 政府透明能否促进政府服务的提升: 基于中国城市面板数据的门槛回归分析——以政府的企业服务为例[J]. 公共管理与政策评论, 2023, 12(5): 80-98. |
[30] | Alnes, P.K. and Haugom, E. (2024) The Effects of Price Framing and Magnitude of Price Differences on Perceived Fairness When Switching from Static to Variable Pricing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 81, Article 103952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103952 |