全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Socio-Demographic and Clinical Aspects of Dropouts from CEPIAD’s Methadone Program between January 2015 and December 2020

DOI: 10.4236/ojpsych.2025.152012, PP. 139-147

Keywords: Dropout, Methadone Program, Retention, CEPIAD, Addiction Management, Opioid Addiction

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Context: Launched on 27 January 2015, CEPIAD’s methadone program, the first in West Africa, has seen a gradual ramp-up. However, despite the success of the first 2 years with massive inclusions, withdrawals from the program have been noted. This situation raised questions within the CEPIAD team, which decided to carry out this study. Objective: The aim of this work is to understand the reasons for discontinuation in order to adapt treatment strategies and improve patient retention in the program. Methodology: We conducted a retrospective descriptive study including patients enrolled in the methadone program who stopped between January 2015 and December 2020. Data were entered in Excel and analyzed using R software version 4.2.2. Results: The study involved a population with a mean age of 47.5 years, with participants aged between 19 and 75 years. The majority of patients were men (89.2%), while women accounted for 10.8%. Education levels varied: 8.3% of patients had no formal education, 36.6% had primary education, 16.7% secondary education and 14.2% higher education. Marital profiles were also diverse, with 22.5% single, 30.8% married, 37.5% divorced and 5% widowed. In terms of accessibility, 46.6% of patients lived close to CEPIAD, while 32.5% lived further away, increasing distance-related constraints. Of the patients, 69.2% lived in the suburbs of Dakar, while 21.7% lived in the city of Dakar. A history of incarceration was common, affecting 52.5% of patients. Clinically, 94.2% of patients were severely addicted to opioids, while 1.7% were moderately or mildly addicted. Initial methadone doses were mainly between 20 and 40 mg (86.5%), with varying titration: 49% received a maintenance dose of less than 60 mg, which may have contributed to dropout. Average follow-up was 21 months. Mental co-morbidities affected 8.3% of patients, while physical co-morbidities included HIV (4.8%), HCV (7.8%), HBV (2.4%) and tuberculosis (4%). In addition, 95% of urine tests were positive, with a high incidence of multiple use of substances such as tobacco (75%), cannabis (15%) and alcohol (5%). Methadone side effects, mainly constipation (28%), abdominal pain (3.3%) and hypersudation (1.7%), were also identified as factors influencing the methadone discontinuation rate. Conclusion: The results of this study highlight the complexity of methadone substitution treatment, and the need for an individualised approach incorporating socio-demographic and clinical specificities to improve retention in the program. The data suggest the

References

[1]  Fraser, H.F. and Isbell, H. (1952) Methadone in the Treatment of Pain. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 149, 1466-1470
[2]  CEPIAD (2015) Methadone Administration Guidelines.
[3]  Banta‐Green, C.J., Maynard, C., Koepsell, T.D., Wells, E.A. and Donovan, D.M. (2009) Retention in Methadone Maintenance Drug Treatment for Prescription‐type Opioid Primary Users Compared to Heroin Users. Addiction, 104, 775-783.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02538.x
[4]  CNLS (2015) Programme de lutte contre l’infection à VIH et autres comorbidités chez les consommateurs de drogues injectables 2012-2015.
http://www.plateforme-elsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/SNG-HCNLS-Plan-strategique-CDI-21-Nov13.pdf
[5]  Kelly, S.M., O’Grady, K.E., Mitchell, S.G., Brown, B.S. and Schwartz, R.P. (2011) Predictors of Methadone Treatment Retention from a Multi-Site Study: A Survival Analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 117, 170-175.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.01.008
[6]  O’Connor, A.M., Cousins, G., Durand, L., Barry, J. and Boland, F. (2020) Retention of Patients in Opioid Substitution Treatment: A Systematic Review. PLOS ONE, 15, e0232086.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232086
[7]  McGovern, M.P. (2006) The Impact of Financial Stress on Substance Use Treatment Outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31, 189-194.
[8]  Gossop, M. (2003) Substance Misuse and the Importance of Treatment: An Outcome Study. Substance Use & Misuse, 38, 341-358.
[9]  Cao, X., Wu, Z., Rou, K., Li, L., Lin, C., Wang, C., et al. (2014) Retention and Its Predictors among Methadone Maintenance Treatment Clients in China: A Six-Year Cohort Study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 145, 87-93.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.09.776
[10]  Field, M. (2015) The Biology of Desire: Why Addiction Is Not a Disease. Addiction, 110, 2039-2039.
https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13141
[11]  Nosyk, B., MacNab, Y.C., Sun, H., Fischer, B., Marsh, D.C., Schechter, M.T., et al. (2009) Proportional Hazards Frailty Models for Recurrent Methadone Maintenance Treatment. American Journal of Epidemiology, 170, 783-792.
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwp186
[12]  Sullivan, S.G. and Detels, R. (2013) Drug Use and Risk of HIV Infection in Asia: A Review of the Literature. AIDS and Behavior, 17, 2695-2710.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-013-0443-4
[13]  Zhou, K., Zhuang, G., Liang, P., Yin, J., Gong, Y. and Zhang, J. (2017) Mortality among Adult Patients in Methadone Maintenance Treatment in China: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 178, 417-423.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.048

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133