|
Low Carbon Economy 2025
Are Green Finance Policies Facilitating the Digital Transformation of Companies?
|
Abstract:
The digital transformation of enterprises is one of the important ways to promote energy saving and emission reduction, thereby helping China achieve its goals of carbon peak and carbon neutrality from a micro perspective. Most of the existing literature focuses on the impacts of low-carbon city pilot policies on enterprises’ carbon emission reduction and green technology innovation capabilities, while the role of enterprise digital transformation has been relatively overlooked. This paper uses panel data of Chinese listed companies from 2000 to 2022 as a sample and employs empirical methods such as the fixed-effects model, propensity score matching (PSM), and difference-in-differences (DID) to investigate the impact and mechanisms of low-carbon city pilot policies on enterprise digital transformation. The study finds that the low-carbon city pilot policy positively promotes enterprise digital transformation, and this conclusion remains robust after a series of robustness tests and endogeneity treatments. Mechanism analysis reveals that the policy can promote digital transformation by alleviating firms’ financing constraints, while government capacity plays a positive moderating role in this relationship. Further heterogeneity analysis shows that the low-carbon city pilot policy has a more significant effect on the digital transformation of technology-intensive firms, non-heavy-polluting firms, and firms in the growth and maturity stages. This paper enriches the research on the mechanisms of enterprise digital transformation under the new era and provides empirical evidence for the top-level design of green finance policies and the realization path of promoting enterprise emission reduction and greening to build a Beautiful China under the conditions of the new development paradigm.
[1] | Bai, F., Liu, D., & Dong, K. (2022). How Digital Transformation Affects Corporate Financial Performance—An Analysis of Multiple Mediation Effects Based on Structural Equations. East China Economic Management, 36, 75-87. |
[2] | Chen, G., Ding, S., & Zhao, X. (2021). China’s Green Financial Policies, Financing Costs and Green Transformation of Enterprises—Based on the Perspective of Central Bank’s Collateral Policy. Financial Research, No. 12, 75-95. |
[3] | Chen, S., Mao, H., & Sun, J. (2022). Low-Carbon City Construction and Corporate Carbon Reduction Performance: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 180, 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04886-1 |
[4] | Chen, X., Huang, Y., & Gao, Y. (2024). Can Urban Low-Carbon Transitions Promote Enterprise Digital Transformation? Finance Research Letters, 59, Article ID: 104807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104807 |
[5] | Chen, Y., & Peng, C. (2024). Confucianism and Corporate Digital Transformation: Evidence from China. International Journal of Emerging Markets. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-11-2023-1810 |
[6] | Cui, H., Wang, B., & Xu, Y. (2023). Green Financial Innovation, Financial Resource Allocation and Corporate Pollution Reduction. China Industrial Economy, No. 10, 118-136. |
[7] | Dong, Y., Sun, Z., Li, W. et al. (2024). How the Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy Reduces Enterprise Carbon Emissions and Paves the Way for High-Quality Development: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05724-w |
[8] | Gao, J., Chu, D., & Lian, Y. (2021). Can ESG Performance Improve Corporate Investment Efficiency? Securities Market Herald, No. 11, 24-34, 72. |
[9] | Guo, F., Yang, S., & Cha, I. (2023). Can Low-Carbon City Building Enhance Urban Green Technology Innovation?—Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment. Soft Science, 37, 40-49. |
[10] | Han, L., Chen, S., & Liang, L. (2021). Digital Economy, Innovation Environment and Urban Innovation Capability. Research Management, 42, 35-45. |
[11] | Hou, Z., & Yu, J. (2024). Smart City, Government Governance Capacity and Fiscal Expenditure Efficiency. Journal of Chengdu University (Social Science Edition), No. 5, 45-57. |
[12] | Hu, J., Yu, X., & Han, Y. (2023). Can ESG Ratings Promote Corporate Green Transformation?—Validation Based on Multi-Temporal Double Difference Method. Research on Quantitative and Technical Economics, 40, 90-111. |
[13] | Hua, Z., & Yu, Y. (2023). Digital Transformation and the Impact of Local Tournament Incentives: Evidence from Publicly Listed Companies in China. Finance Research Letters, 57, Article ID: 104204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104204 |
[14] | Huang, B., Li, H., & Liu, J. (2023). Digital Technology Innovation and High-Quality Development of Chinese Firms—Evidence from Firms’ Digital Patents. Economic Research, 58, 97-115. |
[15] | Huang, H., Zhai, S., & Chen, J. (2016). Corporate Life Cycle, Financing Methods and Financing Constraints—A Study Based on the Moderating Effect of Investor Sentiment. Beijing: Financial Research, No. 7, 96-112. |
[16] | Jiang, T. (2022). Mediating and Moderating Effects in Empirical Studies of Causal Inference. China Industrial Economy, No. 5, 100-120. |
[17] | Li, H., & Liang, D. (2020). Mechanism, Path and Countermeasures of Enterprise Digital Transformation. Guizhou Social Science, No. 10, 120-125. |
[18] | Li, R., & Liu, L. (2021). Green Finance and Corporate Green Innovation. Journal of Wuhan University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 74, 126-140. |
[19] | Pei, X., Liu, Y., & Wang, J. (2023). Enterprise Digital Transformation: Drivers, Economic Effects and Strategy Choices. Reform, No. 5, 124-137. |
[20] | Shen, L., & Liao, X. (2020). Green Finance Reform and Innovation and Corporate Social Responsibility—Evidence from Green Finance Reform and Innovation Pilot Zones. Financial Forum, 25, 69-80. |
[21] | Shi, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhang, W. (2021). Digital Transformation of Chinese Enterprises: Current Situation, Problems and Prospects. Economist, No. 12, 90-97. |
[22] | Si, L., & Cao, H. (2022). Can Green Credit Policy Improve Corporate Environmental Social Responsibility-Based on the Perspectives of External Constraints and Internal Concerns. China Industrial Economy, No. 4, 137-155. |
[23] | Song, H., Sun, Y., & Chen, D. (2019). Evaluation of the Effect of Governmental Air Pollution Control—An Empirical Study from the Construction of “Low-Carbon Cities” in China. Management World, 35, 95-108, 195. |
[24] | Tian, L., & Liu, C. (2021). “Peer” Institutional Pressure and Corporate Green Innovation: Spillover Effects of Environmental Pilot Policies. Economic Management, 43, 156-172. |
[25] | Wang, G., Li, X., & Yang, T. (2023a). Fiscal Balance Restructuring and Digital Transformation of Enterprises: “Spring Rain” or “Counterproductive”? Economic and Management Research, 44, 3-24. |
[26] | Wang, H., & He, H. (2023). The Impact of Fiscal Expenditure on the Digital Transformation and Upgrading of China’s Manufacturing Industry—Based on Panel Data of 31 Regions from 2007 to 2021. Industrial Technology and Economics, 42, 13-21. |
[27] | Wang, W., Wang, X., & Jiang, H. (2023b). Can Low-Carbon City Construction Accelerate the Knowledge Flow of Low-Carbon Technologies? Science Research, 41, 2204-2215. |
[28] | Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2021). Research on Green Credit Policy to Enhance Green Innovation. Management World, 37, 173-188, 11. |
[29] | Wang, Y., & Feng, J. (2022). Research on Green Bonds to Promote Enterprises’ Green Innovation. Financial Research, No. 6, 171-188. |
[30] | Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Corporate ESG Performance, Risk Taking and Green Technology Innovation. Friends of Accounting, No. 10, 94-102. |
[31] | Wen, H., & Zhong, Q. (2020). Can Environmental Protection Tax Reform Pry Enterprises’ Green Technology Innovation—Insights from the Change of China’s Sewage Charge Collection Standard. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, No. 3, 91-100. |
[32] | Wu, F., Hu, H., & Lin, H. (2021). Corporate Digital Transformation and Capital Market Performance-Empirical Evidence from Stock Liquidity. Management World, 37, 130-144, 10. |
[33] | Xu, G., Li, G., & Sun, P. (2023). Inefficient Investment and Digital Transformation: What Is the Role of Financing Constraints? Finance Research Letters, 51, Article ID: 103429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103429 |
[34] | Xu, J., & Cui, J. (2020). Low-Carbon City and Enterprise Green Technology Innovation. China Industrial Economy, No. 12, 178-196. |
[35] | Yu, Z., Peng, Z., & Li, P. (2022). Research on the Impact of Green Finance Development on Regional Carbon Emission—Taking Green Credit, Green Industry Investment and Green Bond as Examples. Financial Theory and Practice, No. 2, 69-77. |
[36] | Zhang, H. (2020). Can Pilot Low-Carbon City Policies Reduce Carbon Emissions?—Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment. Economic Management, 42, 25-41. |
[37] | Zhang, Y., & Luan, J. (2022). Digital Economy Enabling Rural Revitalization: Theoretical Mechanisms, Constraints and Promotion Paths. Reform, No. 5, 79-89. |
[38] | Zhang, Z., Sun, Z., & Lu, H. (2022). Has the Low-Carbon City Pilot Realized the “Increase in Quantity and Quality” of Enterprise Green Technology Innovation? Journal of Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, 38, 85-98. |
[39] | Zhao, D., & Ding, Y. (2021). Mechanisms, Paths and Countermeasures of Digitalization to Promote Rural Revitalization. Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 24, 112-120. |
[40] | Zhao, S., Zhang, L., & An, H. (2023). Has China’s Low-Carbon Strategy Pushed forward the Digital Transformation of Manufacturing Enterprises? Evidence from the Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 102, Article ID: 107184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107184 |
[41] | Zhen, Z. C. (2021). Did the National Low Carbon Strategy Increase the Total Factor Productivity of Enterprises?—A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on Low-Carbon City Pilots. Industrial Economics Research, No. 6, 101-115. |
[42] | Zheng, Q., & Jiang, W. (2022). Research on Digital Transformation of Manufacturing Enterprises under the Perspective of Digital Economy—An Empirical Analysis Based on Enterprise Questionnaire Survey. Jiangsu Social Science, No. 1, 137-149, 244. |