Budget transparency—the open disclosure of government financial information—is increasingly recognized as essential to democratic governance and legitimacy. Empirical research indicates that jurisdictions with well‐implemented transparency measures often experience notable improvements in public trust. For example, studies have shown that regions with robust fiscal disclosure can see trust levels improve by 10% to 20% over multi-year periods. Cross-national surveys further suggest that nations scoring highly on open budget initiatives tend to exhibit elevated levels of citizen engagement and satisfaction with government performance. Theoretically, greater transparency helps reduce information asymmetry between public officials and citizens, thereby enhancing accountability as posited by both the principal-agent framework and broader accountability theories. However, the positive impact of budget transparency on public trust is contingent on contextual factors such as institutional capacity, media freedom, and citizen fiscal literacy. This article synthesizes theoretical frameworks, empirical findings, and policy analyses to explore how enhanced budget transparency can foster public trust, and it provides evidence-based recommendations for strengthening democratic accountability in diverse governance settings.
References
[1]
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. EuropeanLawJournal,13, 447-468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
[2]
Dixon, A. (2016). Navigating the Complexities of Budget Transparency. Public Administration Quarterly, 40, 120-137.
[3]
Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press.
[4]
Estonian Government Report (2019). Digital Innovations in Budget Transparency. Government of Estonia.
[5]
Fung, A., Graham, M., & Weil, D. (2007). Full Disclosure. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9780521699617
[6]
Gibson, R., & Leech, T. (2013). Transparency, Accountability, and Public Trust: A Comparative Study. Governance, 26, 591-609.
[7]
Ivanov, I., & Petrov, D. (2016). Fiscal Transparency and Public Trust in Eastern Europe. Journal of Comparative Politics, 10, 67-89.
[8]
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. AnnalsofInternalMedicine,151, 264-269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
[9]
Nguyen, T., Truong, H., & Nguyen, P. (2018). The Impact of Fiscal Transparency on Public Trust: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Public Policy, 38, 23-45.
[10]
OECD (2020). Digital Transparency in Budget Management: Enhancing Citizen Engagement. OECD Publishing.
[11]
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
[12]
Rawlins, R. (2008). Measuring the Impact of Budget Transparency on Trust in Government. Public Budgeting & Finance, 28, 1-26.
[13]
Smith, J., & Martinez, L. (2015). Quantifying the Effect of Fiscal Transparency on Public Trust. Journal of Financial Governance, 9, 45-62.
[14]
Transparency International (2018). Global Corruption Report: Budget Transparency and Accountability. Transparency International.
[15]
Van Ryzin, G. G., & Cozzens, S. E. (2009). Government Transparency and Citizens’ Reactions. Public Administration Review, 69, 733-743.
