全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Newtonian Field Interaction Hypothesis and Equilibrium Potential Theory

DOI: 10.4236/jhepgc.2025.112032, PP. 438-463

Keywords: Dark Matter

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Despite all the theories on gravity of the last few decades, in this article, we start from those of which we are certain because, as far as we know, celestial bodies, with the presence of negligible relativistic phenomena at small speeds and large distances, essentially obey Newtonian gravity; therefore, the gravitational phenomena we observe in the space around us should be able to be explained by Newtonian physics, even if viewed differently in this article. It all starts from a consideration: since Newtonian gravity is given by a very small perturbation of the temporal component of the Minkowski metric, from the gravitational superposition principle, where independent forces are added, it would mean having independent time metric perturbations simultaneously at the same point of spacetime where a test mass is located, which seems inconceivable. On the other hand, assuming the formation of a single perturbation with interaction between Newtonian fields, through the interpretation of an experiment carried out with a rudimentary gravitational torsion balance (static deflection method) between 2 masses under the influence of another mass (the simplest case), a different value of the active gravitational mass of the same object is generated if not all the masses involved are known, perceived by such an observer as a change in force. If we then imagine measuring the Newtonian gravitational constant G without taking this into account, we can mistakenly arrive at a variation of it, therefore presupposing that its value can be influenced by the Earth itself via the same mechanism proposed in the experiment. Here we chose to use the “old” Newtonian forces to better describe the concept of gravitational mass and gravitational potential, understanding that the gravitational superposition effect may not be a sum of independent forces but rather their sum in a single force, which is different in every point of the created superposition that we exclusively attribute to the observed object. By transferring this interaction effect to the potential of the stars in our galaxy, we obtain a strange result: a net zero potential of the galactic plane, which could help explain some phenomena around us. This theory cannot be considered a new theory of gravitation but rather a different vision of the Newtonian one only that its manifestation is hidden from us by the constant superposition we undergo on Earth.

References

[1]  Gundlach, J.H. and Merkowitz, S.M. (2000) Measurement of Newton’s Constant Using a Torsion Balance with Angular Acceleration Feedback. Physical Review Letters, 85, 2869-2872.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.85.2869
[2]  Froedge, D.T. (2016) The Gravitational Constant May Not Be Constant: Correlation of Gravitational Constant Measurements with Ambient Gravitation.
http://www.arxdtf.org/css/Gravitational%20Constant.pdf
[3]  Schlamminger, S., Holzschuh, E., Kündig, W., Nolting, F., Pixley, R.E., Schurr, J., et al. (2006) Measurement of Newton’s Gravitational Constant. Physical Review D, 74, Article ID: 082001.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.74.082001
[4]  Gregersen, E. (2010) The Milky Way and Beyond. The Rosen Publishing Group, 35-36.
[5]  Vieira, K., Korchagin, V., Carraro, G. and Lutsenko, A. (2023) Vertical Structure of the Milky Way Disk with Gaia DR3. Galaxies, 11, Article No. 77.
https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies11030077
[6]  Gilmore, G. and Reid, N. (1983) New Light on Faint Stars III. Galactic Structure towards the South Pole and the Galactic Thick Disc. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 202, 1025-1047.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/202.4.1025
[7]  Abuter, R., Aimar, N., Amaro Seoane, P., Amorim, A., Bauböck, M., Berger, J.P., et al. (2023) Polarimetry and Astrometry of NIR Flares as Event Horizon Scale, Dynamical Probes for the Mass of Sgr A. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 677, L10.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347416
[8]  Bensby, T., Alves-Brito, A., Oey, M.S., Yong, D. and Meléndez, J. (2011) A First Constraint on the Thick Disk Scale Length: Differential Radial Abundances in K Giants at Galactocentric Radii 4, 8, and 12 Kpc. The Astrophysical Journal, 735, L46.
https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/735/2/l46
[9]  Bovy, J. and Rix, H. (2013) A Direct Dynamical Measurement of the Milky Way’s Disk Surface Density Profile, Disk Scale Length, and Dark Matter Profile at 4 Kpc ≲ r ≲ 9 Kpc. The Astrophysical Journal, 779, Article No. 115.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/779/2/115
[10]  Cheng, J.Y., Rockosi, C.M., Morrison, H.L., Lee, Y.S., Beers, T.C., Bizyaev, D., et al. (2012) A Short Scale Length for the Α-Enhanced Thick Disk of the Milky Way: Evidence from Low-Latitude Segue Data. The Astrophysical Journal, 752, Article No. 51.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/752/1/51
[11]  Freitas, R.A. (2008) Xenology: An Introduction to the Scientific Study of Extra-Terrestrial Life, Intelligence, and Civilization. Xenology Research Institute.
http://www.xenology.info/Xeno/4.3.htm
[12]  Wegg, C., Gerhard, O. and Portail, M. (2015) The Structure of the Milky Way’s Bar Outside the Bulge. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 450, 4050-4069.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv745
[13]  Saito, R.K., Minniti, D., Dias, B., Hempel, M., Rejkuba, M., Alonso-García, J., et al. (2012) Milky Way Demographics with the VVV Survey. I. The 84-Million Star Color-Magnitude Diagram of the Galactic Bulge. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 544, A147.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219448
[14]  Zoccali, M. and Valenti, E. (2016) The 3D Structure of the Galactic Bulge. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 33, e025.
https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2015.56
[15]  Dahmer-Hahn, L.G., Riffel, R., Rodríguez-Ardila, A., Riffel, R.A., Storchi-Bergmann, T., Marinello, M., et al. (2021) Stellar Populations in Local AGNs: Evidence for Enhanced Star Formation in the Inner 100 Pc. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 509, 4653-4668.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3382
[16]  Schödel, R., Feldmeier, A., Kunneriath, D., Stolovy, S., Neumayer, N., Amaro-Seoane, P., et al. (2014) Surface Brightness Profile of the Milky Way’s Nuclear Star Cluster. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 566, A47.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423481
[17]  Cano-González, M., Schödel, R. and Nogueras-Lara, F. (2021) Detecting Hot Stars in the Galactic Centre with Combined Near-and Mid-Infrared Photometry. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 653, A37.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140982
[18]  Feldmeier-Krause, A., Neumayer, N., Schödel, R., Seth, A., Hilker, M., de Zeeuw, P.T., et al. (2015) KMOS View of the Galactic Centre. Young Stars Are Centrally Concentrated. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 584, A2.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526336
[19]  Habibi, M., Gillessen, S., Pfuhl, O., Eisenhauer, F., Plewa, P.M., von Fellenberg, S., et al. (2019) Spectroscopic Detection of a Cusp of Late-Type Stars around the Central Black Hole in the Milky Way. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 872, L15.
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab03cf
[20]  Gallego-Cano, E., Fritz, T., Schödel, R., Feldmeier-Krause, A., Do, T. and Nishiyama, S. (2024) Photometric Classification of Stars around the Milky Way’s Central Black Hole. I. Central Parsec. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 689, A190.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449881
[21]  Murchikova, E.M., Phinney, E.S., Pancoast, A. and Blandford, R.D. (2019) A Cool Accretion Disk around the Galactic Centre Black Hole. Nature, 570, 83-86.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1242-z
[22]  Schödel, R., Merritt, D. and Eckart, A. (2009) The Nuclear Star Cluster of the Milky Way: Proper Motions and Mass. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 502, 91-111.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200810922
[23]  Sanders, R.H. (2009) Modified Newtonian Dynamics: A Falsification of Cold Dark Matter. Advances in Astronomy, 2009, Article ID: 752439.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/752439
[24]  Gentile, G. (2008) MOND and the Universal Rotation Curve: Similar Phenomenologies. The Astrophysical Journal, 684, 1018-1025.
https://doi.org/10.1086/590048
[25]  López-Corredoira, M., Allende Prieto, C., Garzón, F., Wang, H., Liu, C. and Deng, L. (2018) Disk Stars in the Milky Way Detected Beyond 25 Kpc from Its Center. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 612, L8.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832880
[26]  Bhattacharjee, P., Chaudhury, S. and Kundu, S. (2014) Rotation Curve of the Milky Way out to ∼200 Kpc. The Astrophysical Journal, 785, Article No. 63.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/785/1/63
[27]  Jiao, Y., Hammer, F., Wang, H., Wang, J., Amram, P., Chemin, L., et al. (2023) Detection of the Keplerian Decline in the Milky Way Rotation Curve. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 678, A208.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347513
[28]  Courtois, H.M., et al. (2013) Cosmography of the Local Universe. The Astronomical Journal, 146, Article 69.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/146/3/69

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133