全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

汉英网络社区抑郁群体身份认同的话语建构比较研究
A Comparative Study of the Discursive Construction of Depression People Identities in Chinese and English Online Spaces

DOI: 10.12677/ml.2025.134347, PP. 296-303

Keywords: 抑郁群体,网络社区,身份认同,话语策略,话语建构
Depressed People
, Online Spaces, Identity, Discursive Strategies, Discursive Construction

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

由于社会的快速变迁以及压力的增加,越来越多的人深陷抑郁情绪之中,抑郁问题日益凸显,受到人们对抑郁话题的关注。本研究基于网络社区“百度贴吧”和“Reddit”抑郁群体的话语语料,考察其主题内容及话语策略,探究抑郁群体的身份认同并比较其差异。汉英抑郁话语涉及八种主题内容,使用指称策略、述谓策略、强化策略、视角化策略和论辩策略五种话语策略构建五类身份认同:悲观的放弃者、积极的抗争者、厌世的逃避者、无助的受害者和热心的帮助者。汉英抑郁话语在主题内容上有三点不同,在话语策略上有两点不同,在身份认同上有两点不同。研究表明,抑郁群体身份不是内在的、固定的特质,而是通过话语互动过程不断建构的。
Due to rapid social changes and increasing stress, an increasing number of people are experiencing depressive emotions, making depression a growing concern and attracting significant public attention. This study is based on discourse data from depression communities on online spaces “Baidu Tieba” and “Reddit”, examining the themes and discursive strategies of the discourse, exploring the identities of depressed people and comparing the differences in discourse interactions and identity construction between Chinese and English communities. Depressive discourse in Chinese and English online communities involves eight themes and uses five discursive strategies—referential strategies, predication strategies, intensification strategies, perspectivation strategies and argumentation strategies—to construct five types of identity: pessimistic quitter, active fighter, cynical escapist, helpless victim, and enthusiastic helper. There are three differences in thematic content, two differences in discursive strategies, and two differences in identity construction between Chinese and English depressive discourse. The study indicates that the identity of depressed people is not an inherent, fixed trait, but is continuously constructed through the discourse interaction process.

References

[1]  Kabatnik, S. (2022) “(T)he Toxic Green Shimmering Monster Depression (Has) Crawled Out of Its Bush Again”—A Corpus-Based Study of the Lexicon of Depression on Twitter. Sprachwissenschaft, 47, 465-483.
[2]  黄观澜, 周晓璐. 抑郁症患者的语言使用模式[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 838-848.
[3]  丁雅婷, 伍麟. 音乐“网抑云”: 青年圈群抑郁话语的符号表征和互动策略[J]. 当代青年研究, 2023(1): 98-111.
[4]  高一虹, 孟玲. 自杀倾向的话语表述——大学生“走饭”微博分析[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2019(1): 43-55.
[5]  Coll-Florit, M., Climent, S., Sanfilippo, M. and Hernández-Encuentra, E. (2021) Metaphors of Depression. Studying First Person Accounts of Life with Depression Published in Blogs. Metaphor and Symbol, 36, 1-19.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2020.1845096
[6]  Song, H.J. (2019) A Study of Figurative Language in Medical Discourse with a Focus on Depression Metaphors. Discourse and Cognition, 26, 27-48.
https://doi.org/10.15718/discog.2019.26.2.27
[7]  叶盈杉. 从“自述”到“自救”: 网络社区中抑郁症患者的自我呈现——基于“渡过”公众号推文的质性分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2022.
[8]  Tian, X., Batterham, P., Song, S., Yao, X. and Yu, G. (2018) Characterizing Depression Issues on Sina Weibo. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, Article 764.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040764
[9]  徐晓庆. 难以言说的痛: 抑郁症患者的疾病表达——一个叙事学视角的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2019.
[10]  连钰芳. 自我表露视角下抑郁症群体的社交媒体使用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 厦门: 厦门大学, 2020.
[11]  边诗朦. 社交媒体中健康传播主体间互动研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2021.
[12]  晏青, 刘钰. 社交媒体平台抑郁群体的社会支持寻求研究——基于对微博“抑郁症超话”的考察[J]. 新闻界, 2022(6): 45-56, 64.
[13]  Murray, L.L. (2010) Distinguishing Clinical Depression from Early Alzheimer’s Disease in Elderly People: Can Narrative Analysis Help? Aphasiology, 24, 928-939.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030903422460
[14]  伍麟, 彭子剑. 言为心声: 人工智能探测抑郁症的语言证据与价值[J]. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 2020, 57(5): 136-144.
[15]  马晓萌. 失调与重构: 进食障碍者社区互动中的身份建构[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东理工大学, 2014.
[16]  倪渊渟. 产后抑郁女性的疾病叙事与身份认同[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2020.
[17]  赵淼. 展演与互助: 新媒体语境下抑郁症患者的身份认同建构研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江理工大学, 2023.
[18]  Cruwys, T. and Gunaseelan, S. (2016) “Depression Is Who I Am”: Mental Illness Identity, Stigma and Wellbeing. Journal of Affective Disorders, 189, 36-42.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.012
[19]  徐岩. 住院精神病患者污名化下的身份抗争[J]. 广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 39(5): 79-85.
[20]  Tabouret-Keller, A. (2001) Language and Identity. In: Coulmas, F., Ed., The Handbook of Sociolinguistics, Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 301-326.
[21]  Wodak, R. (2001) The Discourse-Historical Approach. In: Wodak, R. and Meyer, M., Eds., Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, SAGE Publications, Ltd., 63-94.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.n4

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133