全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

“道法自然”的诠释重构——以吴澄《老子道德真经注》为中心
Reinterpreting the Dao-te Ching of “Follow the Dao of Nature”—Centered on Wu Cheng’s Annotations of the “The Dao-te Ching”

DOI: 10.12677/cnc.2025.132041, PP. 272-280

Keywords: 道法自然,吴澄,体用论,诠释重构,儒道结合,老子
Follow the Dao of Nature
, Wu Cheng, Ti (体) and Yong (用), Interpretive Reconstruction, Integration of Confucianism and Daoism, Laozi

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

元代吴澄的《老子道德真经注》对“道法自然”的诠释,标志着老学史上一次重要的范式转换。本文通过思想史溯源、文本细读与哲学分析,揭示吴澄如何以理学体用论重构“自然”概念,既回应河上公、王弼等传统注疏的诠释困境,又开创儒道融合的新路径。吴澄将“自然”提升为“道体之本然”,通过“体用一源”框架消解“法”字的语义断裂与逻辑矛盾,并将道家自然观转化为“即体即用”的实践哲学。这一诠释不仅解决了“五大”悖论等传统难题,更在元代三教合流语境下,为道家思想参与主流话语竞争提供理论资源,对明清自然观演变具有深远影响。
In the Yuan Dynasty, Wu Cheng’s Annotations of the Daoist Morality Classic (The Dao-te Ching) reinterpreted the Daoist principle of “Follow the Dao of Nature”, marking a significant paradigm shift in the history of the Laozi school. This article, through intellectual history tracing, textual exegesis, and philosophical analysis, reveals how Wu Cheng used the Neo-Confucian theory of Ti (体) and Yong (用) to reconstruct the concept of ziran (自然), responding to the interpretive dilemmas of traditional commentaries by figures like He Shangong and Wang Bi, and pioneering a new path of Confucian-Daoist integration. Wu Cheng elevated ziran (自然) to “the original state of the Dao’s body”, dissolved the semantic rupture and logical contradictions of the word “Fa” through the “one source of body and function” framework, and transformed the Daoist natural view into a “both body and function” practical philosophy. This interpretation not only resolved traditional puzzles like the “Five Great” paradox but also, in the Yuan Dynasty’s context of the convergence of the three teachings, provided theoretical resources for Daoist thought to engage in mainstream discourse competition, and had a profound impact on the evolution of natural views in the Ming and Qing dynasties.

References

[1]  河上公. 道德真经注, 老子集成(第一卷) [M]. 北京: 宗教文化出版社, 2011: 150.
[2]  王弼. 道德真经注, 老子集成(第一卷) [M]. 北京: 宗教文化出版社, 2011: 217.
[3]  陈鼓应. 老子今注今译[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2003: 173.
[4]  李约. 道德真經新注, 老子集成(第一卷) [M]. 北京: 宗教文化出版社, 2011: 545.
[5]  成玄英. 老子道德經開題序訣義疏, 老子集成(第一卷) [M]. 北京: 宗教文化出版社, 2011: 306.
[6]  吴澄. 道德真經注, 老子集成(第五卷) [M]. 北京: 宗教文化出版社, 2011.
[7]  吕知常. 道德經講義, 老子集成(第四卷) [M]. 北京: 宗教文化出版社, 2011: 253.
[8]  刘笑敢. 老子古今(上卷) [M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2005: 288.
[9]  王弼. 老子道德经注校释[M]. 楼宇烈, 校. 北京: 中华书局, 2008: 64.
[10]  陈鼓应. 老子注译及评介[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2009: 165.
[11]  范应元. 老子道德經古本集註, 老子集成(第四卷) [M]. 北京: 宗教文化出版社, 2011: 413.
[12]  洪应绍. 道德經測, 老子集成(第七卷) [M]. 北京: 宗教文化出版社, 2011: 706.
[13]  陈景元. 道德真經藏室纂微篇, 老子集成(第二卷) [M]. 北京: 宗教文化出版社, 2011: 603.
[14]  安乐哲, 郝大维. 《道德经》与关联性的宇宙论——一种诠释性的语脉[J]. 彭国翔, 译, 求是学刊, 2003, 30(2): 5-12.
[15]  吴澄. 吴澄集(卷四) [M]. 方旭东, 光结, 校. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2021.
[16]  朱熹. 朱子全书(修订本)第十三册[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2010: 332.
[17]  吴澄. 易纂言导读[M]. 王新春, 吕颖, 周玉凤, 校. 济南: 齐鲁书社, 2006: 71.
[18]  王夫之. 老子衍[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2009: 12-16.
[19]  戴震. 孟子字义疏证·理十五条(卷上) [M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1961: 171.
[20]  陆西星. 方壶外史(下卷) [M]. 北京: 宗教文化出版社, 2010: 369.
[21]  王夫之. 张子正蒙注[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1975: 11.
[22]  海德格尔. 林中路[M]. 孙周兴, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 1997: 60-61.
[23]  Naess, A. (1973) The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement. A Summary. Inquiry, 16, 95-100.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682
[24]  Jonas, H. (1985) The Imperative of Responsibility. University of Chicago Press.
[25]  安乐哲. 让中国哲学讲中国话[J]. 田辰山, 译. 人民日报, 2015, 8(10): 16.
[26]  汉斯-格奥尔格·伽达默尔. 真理与方法——哲学诠释学的基本特征(上卷) [M]. 洪汉鼎, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 1999: 355.
[27]  怀特海. 过程与实在——宇宙论研究[M]. 李步楼, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2017: 75.
[28]  Holling, C.S. (1973) Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1-23.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133