全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

产业协同集聚背景下组织容错机制对员工创新行为的双路径影响
The Dual-Path Impact of Organizational Fault Tolerance Mechanism on Employees’ Innovation Behavior in the Context of Industrial Collaborative Agglomeration

DOI: 10.12677/mm.2025.154086, PP. 49-59

Keywords: 差错管理氛围,员工创新行为,差错取向,创新自我效能感,产业协同集聚
Error Management Climate
, Employee Innovative Behavior, Error Orientation, Innovative Self-Efficacy, Industrial Synergy and Agglomeration

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

在新质生产力驱动高质量发展和产业集聚融合的时代背景下,企业提高创新能力,特别是清洁可持续发展的绿色技术创新能力,是推动高质量发展和产业转型升级的关键路径。在此过程中,企业微观层面的创新能力至关重要,其中员工创新行为的质量和数量是衡量企业创新绩效的重要指标。作为企业创新活动和可持续发展的基石,员工创新潜能的激发需要特定的组织情境支持。本研究立足于三元交互理论和社会认知理论,提出并验证了“组织情境–个体认知–创新表现”的研究框架,深入探究了差错管理氛围对员工创新活动的影响过程。实证研究揭示了三个重要发现:第一,良好的差错管理氛围能够有效增强员工的创新表现;第二,这种影响是通过两条并行的认知路径实现的,即差错取向和创新自我效能感;第三,构建的双中介作用模型成功解释了差错管理氛围如何通过改变员工的认知评价进而促进创新行为的内在机理。本研究拓展了创新行为影响因素的研究边界,揭示了组织氛围与个体认知的互动关系,完善了差错管理研究的理论框架。这些发现对于当前企业如何培育创新文化、激发员工创造力、推动颠覆性技术突破具有重要的实践指导意义,同时为企业在新质生产力发展进程中提升创新能力提供了新的思路和方法。
In the context of the era of high-quality development driven by new-quality productivity and industrial synergy and agglomeration, it is the key path for enterprises to improve their innovation capabilities, especially the ability to innovate in clean and sustainable green technologies, to promote high-quality development and industrial transformation and upgrading. In this process, the innovation ability of enterprises at the micro level is crucial, and the quality and quantity of employees’ innovation behaviors are important indicators to measure the innovation performance of enterprises. As the cornerstone of enterprises’ innovation activities and sustainable development, stimulating employees’ innovative potential requires specific organizational contextual support. Grounded in triadic reciprocal determinism and social cognitive theory, this study proposes and validates a research framework of “organizational context-individual cognition-innovation performance”, delving into the process by which error management climate impacts employees’ innovative activities. The empirical findings reveal three key insights: First, a positive error management climate can effectively enhance employees’ innovation performance; second, this influence is realized through two parallel cognitive pathways, namely error orientation and innovative self-efficacy; third, the constructed dual mediation model successfully explains the internal mechanism by which error management climate promotes innovation behavior by altering employees’ cognitive evaluations. This study expands the research boundaries of factors affecting innovation behavior, reveals the interactive relationship between organizational climate and individual cognition, and refines the theoretical framework of error management research. These findings provide significant practical guidance for contemporary enterprises on

References

[1]  周文, 许凌云. 论新质生产力: 内涵特征与重要着力点[J]. 改革, 2023(10): 1-13.
[2]  韩翼, 杨百寅. 真实型领导、心理资本与员工创新行为: 领导成员交换的调节作用[J]. 管理世界, 2011(12): 78-86.
[3]  刘云, 石金涛. 组织创新气氛与激励偏好对员工创新行为的交互效应研究[J]. 管理世界, 2009, 25(10): 88-101+114+188.
[4]  杜鹏程, 李敏, 倪清, 等. 差错反感文化对员工创新行为的影响机制研究[J]. 管理学报, 2015, 12(4): 538-545.
[5]  尹润锋, 朱颖俊. 绩效考核目标取向与员工创新行为: 差错管理文化的中介作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2013, 34(2): 174-180.
[6]  王重鸣, 郭维维, Frese, M., Rauch, A. 创业者差错取向的绩效作用及其跨文化比较[J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(11): 1203-1211.
[7]  杜鹏程, 贾玉立, 倪清. 差错能成为创新之源吗——基于差错管理文化对员工创造力影响的跨层次分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2015, 35(9): 161-166.
[8]  马璐, 刘闯. 员工差错取向对创新行为的影响机制研究——差错反感文化的调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(10): 146-152.
[9]  鞠芳辉, 谢子远, 季晓芬. 善待员工的工作不满: 工作不满与员工创新性的关系实证研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2008(6): 108-117.
[10]  尹润锋. 绩效考核目标取向对员工创新行为的影响研究——员工差错学习的中介作用[J]. 工业技术经济, 2011, 30(11): 12-16.
[11]  Frese, M. and Van Dyck, C. (1996) Error Management: Learning from Errors and Organizational Design. Working Paper. University of Amsterdam.
[12]  洪自强, 王重鸣. 工作情景中差错概念与差错取向因素分析[J]. 心理科学, 2000, 23(5): 542-546.
[13]  支富华. 差错管理及其应用[J]. 科学管理研究, 2001, 19(6): 44-46.
[14]  尹奎, 孙健敏, 陈乐妮. 差错管理氛围研究述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2016, 38(2): 75-87.
[15]  张宁俊, 袁梦莎, 付春香, 吴蕊君. 差错管理氛围与员工创新行为的关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(S1): 94-101.
[16]  陈云, 杜鹏程. 核心自我评价、差错取向对员工创新行为的影响[J]. 首都经济贸易大学学报, 2019, 21(6): 100-108.
[17]  高晶. 差错取向与个体创新行为关系研究——基于团队性绩效考核中介视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2013, 30(22): 11-15.
[18]  Bandura, A. (1977) Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191
[19]  Tierney, P. and Farmer, S.M. (2002) Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137-1148. Https://doi.org/10.2307/3069429
[20]  van Dyck, C., Frese, M., Baer, M. and Sonnentag, S. (2005) Organizational Error Management Culture and Its Impact on Performance: A Two-Study Replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1228-1240.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1228
[21]  杜运周, 张玉利, 任兵. 展现还是隐藏竞争优势: 新企业竞争者导向与绩效U型关系及组织合法性的中介作用[J]. 管理世界, 2012, 28(7): 96-107.
[22]  顾远东, 彭纪生. 组织创新氛围对员工创新行为的影响: 创新自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2010, 13(1): 30-41.
[23]  刘追, 郑倩. 不确定性规避与员工创新行为: 创新自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2016, 33(4): 149-155.
[24]  贾冀南, 孔祥学, 王申玥. 差错管理氛围对新生代员工创新行为影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(9): 238-246.
[25]  王永跃, 王慧娟, 王晓辰. 内部人身份感知对员工创新行为的影响——创新自我效能感和遵从权威的作用[J]. 心理科学, 2015, 38(4): 954-959.
[26]  van Dyck, C., Frese, M., Baer, M. and Sonnentag, S. (2005) Organizational Error Management Culture and Its Impact on Performance: A Two-Study Replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1228-1240.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1228
[27]  Cigularov, K.P., Chen, P.Y. and Rosecrance, J. (2010) The Effects of Error Management Climate and Safety Communication on Safety: A Multi-Level Study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42, 1498-1506.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.01.003
[28]  刘云, 石金涛. 组织创新气氛对员工创新行为的影响过程研究——基于心理授权的中介效应分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2010(3): 133-144.
[29]  Scott, S.G. and Bruce, R.A. (1994) Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607.
https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
[30]  Rybowiak, V., Garst, H., Frese, M. and Batinic, B. (1999) Error Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ): Reliability, Validity, and Different Language Equivalence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 527-547.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199907)20:4<527::aid-job886>3.0.co;2-g
[31]  顾远东, 彭纪生. 创新自我效能感对员工创新行为的影响机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2011, 32(9): 63-73.
[32]  Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R. and Ziv, E. (2010) Inclusive Leadership and Employee Involvement in Creative Tasks in the Workplace: The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 250-260.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.504654
[33]  Podsakoff, P.M. and Organ, D.W. (1986) Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531-544.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133