|
Dispute Settlement 2025
论“好意同乘”致害侵权责任承担
|
Abstract:
《中华人民共和国民法典》(以下简称民法典)第1217条对好意同乘有所规定,即“非营运机动车发生交通事故造成无偿搭乘人损害,属于该机动车一方责任的,应当减轻其赔偿责任,但是机动车使用人有故意或者重大过失的除外。”自该条款实施以来,在司法实践中因理解不同而引发诸多争议,作为一项条款,需要准确理解其内涵,厘清其责任以便于解释适用。通过对“好意同乘”相关制度内涵和“好意同乘”致害侵权行为无偿性和非契约性的特性进行界定,对“好意同乘”致害责任的司法现状及产生的问题进行分析,从而对“好意同乘”的规则、无偿认定以及适用规则等提出完善建议。
Article 1217 of the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Civil Code) stipulates provisions regarding good Samaritan carpooling that “if a traffic accident involving a non-commercial motor vehicle causes damage to a passenger without compensation, and it is the responsibility of the motor vehicle, its liability for compensation shall be reduced, except where the user of the motor vehicle is intentional or grossly negligent.” Since the implementation of this provision, many controversies have arisen in judicial practice due to different interpretations, and as a clause, it is necessary to accurately understand its connotation and clarify its responsibilities so as to facilitate its interpretation and application. By defining the connotation of the relevant system of “good intentions and rides” and the gratuitous and non-contractual characteristics of the tort of “good intentions and rides”, this paper analyzes the judicial status and problems arising from the liability of “good intentions and rides”, so as to put forward suggestions for improving the rules, gratuitous determination and applicable rules of “good intentions and rides”.
[1] | 陈龙业. 论《民法典》侵权责任编关于免责事由的创新发展与司法适用[J]. 法律适用, 2020(13): 30-37. |
[2] | 王利明. 侵权责任法研究(下卷) [M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2011: 480. |
[3] | 沈海星. 好意同乘条款的司法适用探究——基于民法典施行以来全国222份裁判文书的实证分析[C]//上海市法学会. 《上海法学研究》集刊2022年第18卷——上海市法学会诉讼法研究会文集. [出版者不详], 2023: 227-237. |
[4] | 王利明. 民法. 侵权行为法[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 1993: 517. |
[5] | 王泽鉴. 民法学说与判例研究(第4册) [M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1998: 295. |
[6] | [美]本杰明∙卡多佐. 司法过程的性质[M]. 苏力, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1997: 62. |
[7] | 徐银波. 论侵权损害完全赔偿原则之缓和[J]. 法商研究, 2013, 30(3): 65-73. |