全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

邮轮旅游“违约性精神损害赔偿”的争议及修正路径研究
Study on the Dispute and Correction Path of “Compensation for Breach of Contract Mental Damage” in Cruise Tourism

DOI: 10.12677/ds.2025.114144, PP. 173-179

Keywords: 邮轮旅游合同,海上旅客运输合同,违约精神损害赔偿
Cruise Travel Contract
, Maritime Passenger Transport Contract, Compensation for Breach of Contract Mental Damage

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

随着经济的发展,邮轮运输业与旅游产业呈现出融合发展的趋势,兼具运输和旅游双重属性的邮轮旅游活动使得其在法律规范适用上容易出现交叉杂糅或法益保护空缺。游轮旅游体现旅客对精神利益的追求,与邮轮相关行为造成旅客的精神损害,在不属于人身侵权引起精神损害的范畴内时,若依海上旅客运输合同则无法依现有法律请求违约精神损害赔偿,因此邮轮旅游违约精神损害赔偿以旅游合同为依据才符合法理。未来立法方向应是设立混合邮轮合同以融合旅客运输和旅游合同内容,完善法律制度以弥补现有事实判断和定性上的困难。在解决上述问题基础上,邮轮旅游的违约精神损害赔偿才有处可循。
With the development of economy, the cruise transportation industry and the tourism industry show a trend of integrated development. The cruise tourism activities with the dual attributes of transportation and tourism make it easy to cross and hybridise or lack of protection of legal interests in terms of appropriate legal norms. Cruise tourism reflects the pursuit of spiritual interests of passengers, which is related to cruise ships and causes spiritual damage to passengers in the category of spiritual damage caused by physical infringement, if the contract of carriage of passengers by sea is followed by the law, the compensation for spiritual damage for breach of contract is requested according to the existing law. Therefore, the compensation for mental damage for breach of contract of cruise tourism is based on the tourism contract, which conforms to the complete jurisprudence mixed cruise contract to integrate the contents of passenger transport and tourism contract, improve the legal system to make up for the existing fact judgment and qualitative difficulties on the basis of solving the above problems, cruise tourism breach of the spiritual damage compensation can be followed.

References

[1]  [英]维克多∙密谢尔顿. 旅游营销学[M]. 向萍, 等, 译. 北京: 中国旅游出版社, 2001.
[2]  方懿. 邮轮旅游民事法律关系初探[J]. 中国海商法研究, 2013, 24(2): 43-47.
[3]  郭萍. 对邮轮合同法律性质的探究及思考[J]. 中国海商法研究, 2016, 27(1): 55-60.
[4]  吕方园. 运输视角下邮轮法律问题研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2015.
[5]  郑永宽. 违约责任与侵权责任竞合中的精神损害赔偿[J]. 中州学刊, 2022(11): 63-71.
[6]  曾嘉琪. 我国邮轮旅客人身损害赔偿责任限制制度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 中南财经政法大学, 2021.
[7]  吴煦, 孔德兵. 邮轮公司对旅客人身伤亡的赔偿责任限制——基于类型结合合同的视角[J]. 中国海商法研究, 2021, 32(3): 53-60.
[8]  孙思琪. 邮轮旅游法律适用论要[J]. 武大国际法评论, 2018, 2(2): 116-125.
[9]  孙思琪. 邮轮旅游法律要论[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2018: 36-138.
[10]  董泽瑞. 包销模式邮轮旅游的立法完善——以邮轮旅游中存在的法律关系为切入点[J]. 世界海运, 2022, 45(11): 41-48.
[11]  Lazarus, R.J. (2002) Brief of Respondents, Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Ayers, No. 01-963 (U.S. Aug. 19, 2002).

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133