全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

法兰克福学派技术理性批判的内在逻辑:从技术批判到政治批判
The Internal Logic of the Frankfurt School’s Critique of Technological Rationality: From Critique of Technology to Critique of Politics

DOI: 10.12677/acpp.2025.144170, PP. 337-343

Keywords: 法兰克福学派,科学技术,技术理性,数字劳动异化
Frankfurt School
, Science and Technology, Technological Rationality, Digital Labor Alienation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

技术理性在推动现代化进程的同时,亦导致人类文明面临结构性危机。法兰克福学派通过其技术批判理论系统阐释了技术理性异化的生成机理,深刻揭示资本主义制度下技术对人主体的支配机制。该学派指出,在发达工业社会语境中,技术体系已演化为维系资本主义政治统治的操控装置,并通过价值中立的表象异化为新型意识形态载体。相较于其他西方技术批判理论,法兰克福学派的独特贡献在于其揭示了技术理性与政治权力的共谋关系——二者通过精密耦合形成新型控制范式,并对此异化过程的内在生成逻辑进行了辩证唯物主义的系统解构。尽管存在理论局限性,但其对技术异化现象的批判性反思,仍为当代科技发展提供了重要启示。在人工智能与算法技术主导的第四次工业革命浪潮中,技术控制呈现出智能化与泛在化特征:智能算法重构社会规训机制,工业文明深化全球物化进程。倘若持续固守技术至上的单向度发展模式,将不可逆转地引发生态系统崩溃与人类本质异化的双重危机。我国正处于现代化建设的关键阶段,技术创新与理性建构仍是实现高质量发展的重要引擎。
While technological rationality has propelled the modernization process, it has simultaneously led human civilization to face a structural crisis. The Frankfurt School, through its theory of technology criticism, systematically elucidates the generative mechanism underlying the alienation of technological rationality, profoundly revealing the mechanism by which technology dominates the human subject under the capitalist system. The school posits that, in the context of developed industrial society, the technological system has evolved into an apparatus of control that upholds capitalist political dominance and, through its semblance of value-neutrality, has been reified as a new ideological carrier. Compared to other Western theories of technology criticism, the unique contribution of the Frankfurt School lies in its exposure of the collusion between technological rationality and political power—whereby the two form a new paradigm of control through intricate coupling—and in its systematic deconstruction of the internal generative logic of this process of alienation through dialectical materialism. Although there are theoretical limitations, its critical reflection on the phenomenon of technological alienation still provides important insights for contemporary technological development. In the wave of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, dominated by artificial intelligence and algorithmic technologies, technological control exhibits characteristics of increased intelligence and ubiquity: intelligent algorithms are reconstructing the mechanisms of social discipline, while industrial civilization deepens the global process of reification. If the unidimensional, technology-supremacist development model is persistently maintained, it will irreversibly trigger a dual crisis of ecological system collapse and the alienation of human essence. Our country is currently at a critical stage of modernization; technological innovation and rational construction remain important engines for achieving high-quality

References

[1]  齐美尔. 货币哲学[M]. 陈戎女, 等, 译. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2002: 160.
[2]  [德]马克斯·韦伯. 经济与社会[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1998: 56.
[3]  丁立群. 实践哲学: 传统与超越[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2012: 56.
[4]  赫伯特·马尔库塞. 单面人[M]. 左晓斯, 张宜生, 肖滨, 译. 长沙: 湖南人民出版社, 1988: 11.
[5]  马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集: 第3卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 550.
[6]  兰俏枝, 高德步. 基于“虚假需求”理论的当代资本主义批判[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2018(6): 92-95.
[7]  兰俏枝. 基于不同视角的当代资本主义发展阶段研究[J]. 东岳论丛, 2018, 39(8): 55-62.
[8]  马尔库塞. 工业文明与新左派[M]. 任立, 编译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1982: 82.
[9]  哈贝马斯. 作为“意识形态”的技术与科学[M]. 李黎, 译. 上海: 上海学林出版社, 1999: 62.
[10]  马克思. 资本论第1卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1975, 90.
[11]  哈贝马斯. 交往行为理论第二卷[M]. 曹卫东, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2004: 456.
[12]  海德格尔. 存在与时间[M]. 陈嘉映, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2014: 278.
[13]  马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集第二卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2012: 70.
[14]  马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集第五卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 269.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133