The purpose of this study was to learn about the obstacles and barriers to teaching Adapted Physical Education (APE) from the viewpoints of Physical Education (PE) teachers in rural New Hampshire public schools grades K-12. Two research issues drove this project: What challenges and barriers do Adapted Physical Education teachers experience when including students with disabilities in general physical education? And What are the experiences of rural New Hampshire Public Schools’ Adapted Physical Education teachers to implement and adapt their classes for students with special needs? The study included interviews, observations, and the collection of artifacts and documents of Physical Education teachers in New Hampshire to investigate these concerns. Adapted Physical Education teachers encounter barriers and issues with inadequate equipment, class size, administrative support (superintendent and principal), physical space, funding, and a lack of professional development, according to the literature on Physical Education. However, in New Hampshire, a limited amount of study has been done on Adapted Physical Education, especially in rural public-school districts. Data was collected through triangulation using observations, document collection, and semi-structured interviews with Physical Education teachers in New Hampshire. Nearly all the Physical Education teachers in this study stated that they have adequate and sufficient administrative support (superintendent and principal); however, many of the PE teachers faced their biggest barriers and challenges when trying to work with students that have Social Emotional Learning (SEL) disabilities and behavioral issues. The research found that paraprofessional support is lacking, and, in some cases, it is completely non-existent in the PE classroom. Furthermore, several of the participants in this study cited “time” as a barrier, since they reportedly have limited opportunities to meet with students that have disabilities daily. Typically, only one class meeting per week. One participant in this study stated that the entire sixth grade class/students do not receive Physical Education for the entire school year. Moreover, the study also showed that elementary and middle school students have limited opportunities and fewer options to take Physical Education classes compared to high school students. In addition, none of the participants in this study have earned their CAPE license and certification. Therefore, recommendations emerged that Physical Education teachers receive additional training and
References
[1]
Adyrkhaiev, S., & Adyrkhaieva, L. (2017). The Influence of Adaptive Physical Education on Physical Health and Fitness of Students with Disabilities. Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach, 7, 96-104. https://doi.org/10.21277/sw.v2i7.322
[2]
An, J., & Meaney, K. S. (2015). Inclusion Practices in Elementary Physical Education: A Social-Cognitive Perspective. International Journal of Disability, Development & Education, 62, 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2014.998176
[3]
Block, M. E. (2016). A Teacher’s Guide to Adapted Physical Education (4th ed.). Paul H. Brookes.
[4]
Bruno, L. E. (2020). Teacher Readiness in Adapted Physical Education: Teaching the “Able,” Not the “Label.” Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 91, 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2020.1720871
[5]
Budge, K. (2006). Rural Leaders, Rural Places: Problem, Privilege, and Possibility. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 21, 1-10.
[6]
Byrnes, M. (2002). Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in Special Education. McGraw-Hill/Dushkin.
[7]
Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among the Five Approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.
[8]
Creswell, J. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
[9]
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Sage Publications.
[10]
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[11]
Kirk, D., Macdonald, D., & O’Sullivan, M. (2006). The Handbook of Physical Education. SAGE.
[12]
LaFee, S. (2008). Let’s Get Physical! P.E. Struggles to Make the Grade. The Education Digest, 73, 49-52.
[13]
Lieberman, L. J., Houston-Wilson, C., & Kozub, F. M. (2002). Perceived Barriers to Including Students with Visual Impairments in General Physical Education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 364-377. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.19.3.364
[14]
Lieberman, L. J., Robinson, B., & Rollheiser, H. (2006). Youth with Visual Impairments: Experiences within General Physical Education. RE: View, 38, 35-48. https://doi.org/10.3200/REVU.38.1.35-48
[15]
Norton, S., & Bird, G. (2017). Education finance in New Hampshire: Headed to a rural crisis. New Hampshire Center for Public Policy Studies, 1-21.
[16]
Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2019). Applied Research for Sustainable Change: A Guide for Education Leaders. Harvard Education Publishing Group.
[17]
Saldaña, J. (2021). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage.
[18]
Samalot-Rivera, A., Van Munster, M. de A., Lieberman, L., & Houston-Wilson, C. (2017). Content Validation of the Individualized Education Plan Applied to Physical Education. Estudiospedagógicos (Valdivia), 43, 293-314. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052017000200016
[19]
Showalter, D., Hartman, S., Johnson, J., & Klein, B. (2017). Why Rural Matters 2015-2016: Understanding the Changing Landscape. Rural School and Community Trust. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED590169.pdf
