全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Using Rule-Based Logic to Streamline Patient Outcome Monitoring in a Multidisciplinary Diabetes Specialty Clinic

DOI: 10.4236/ijcm.2025.164014, PP. 225-231

Keywords: Electronic Health Records and Systems, Quality, Diabetes, Biosurveillance, Case Reporting

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background: Data collection for research and quality improvement can be resource-intensive, often requiring manual chart reviews. This challenge was evident in a multidisciplinary diabetes clinic within an academic family medicine practice. Traditional methods for evaluating metrics relied on time-intensive processes, hindering efficient quality assessments. Objectives: To develop a streamlined, rules-based reporting solution within Epic EMR to simplify data collection and demonstrate patient outcome improvements, specifically hemoglobin A1c levels, in a multidisciplinary diabetes clinic. Methods: A series of custom rules were created to identify clinic visits, capture baseline and follow-up metrics, and generate automated reports for analysis. The rules included specifications for identifying clinic visit types, calculating first and last visit dates, and retrieving laboratory data for pre- and post-clinic comparisons. These rules were then used to populate columns in a reporting workbench for real-time data display. Results: The rules-based reporting solution yielded a dataset of 151 patients, with metrics including pre- and post-clinic hemoglobin A1c values, visit counts, and outcome trends. Conclusions: Informatics-driven solutions like this rules-based reporting system can significantly reduce the burden of data collection for research and quality improvement initiatives. This approach enhances the capacity for real-time outcome monitoring and supports the integration of evidence-based practices in clinical settings.

References

[1]  Williams, J., Craig, T.J. and Robson, D. (2020) Barriers and Facilitators of Clinician and Researcher Collaborations: A Qualitative Study. BMC Health Services Research, 20, Article No. 1126.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05978-w
[2]  Straub, L., Gagne, J.J., Maro, J.C., Nguyen, M.D., Beaulieu, N., Brown, J.S., et al. (2019) Evaluation of Use of Technologies to Facilitate Medical Chart Review. Drug Safety, 42, 1071-1080.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-019-00838-x
[3]  Sathe, N.A., Nocon, R.S., Hughes, B., Peek, M.E., Chin, M.H. and Huang, E.S. (2016) The Costs of Participating in a Diabetes Quality Improvement Collaborative: Variation among Five Clinics. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 42, 18-25.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1553-7250(16)42002-7

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133