全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

On Two Different Approaches to the Optimal Unemployment Insurance Policy

DOI: 10.4236/me.2025.164028, PP. 593-615

Keywords: Unemployment Insurance, Models of Unemployment Insurance, Actual Unemployment Insurance Schemes, OECD Tax-Benefit Model

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The article focuses on two different analytical approaches to the optimal unemployment insurance policy. The aim is to delve deeper into the particular independence between different formal designs of unemployment insurance schemes. The main point has been to frame these designs into two very important general principles and to show that the two principles remain fundamental keys to reading the models adopted regardless of their chosen formal setting. On the real policy plane, strong differences between countries’ actual unemployment insurance schemes are then underlined. The “OECD tax-benefit model” has been the precious informative source for the different basic structure of benefit provision in many counties. The possible connections between the analytical area and the actual area of unemployment insurance schemes and the number of related questions and largely open issues conclude the article.

References

[1]  Abraham, Á., Brogueira de Sousa, J., Marimon, R., & Mayr, L. (2023). On the Design of a European Unemployment Insurance System. European Economic Review, 156, Article ID: 104469.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104469
[2]  Baily, M. N. (1978). Some Aspects of Optimal Unemployment Insurance. Journal of Public Economics, 10, 379-402.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(78)90053-1
[3]  Beblavy, M., & Lenaerts, K. (2017). Flexibility and Added Value of a European Unemployment Benefits Scheme. CEEPS Papers 12230, Centre for European Policy Studies.
[4]  Chetty, R. (2006). A General Formula for the Optimal Level of Social Insurance. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 1879-1901.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.01.004
[5]  Chetty, R. (2009). Sufficient Statistics for Welfare Analysis: A Bridge between Structural and Reduced-Form Methods. Annual Review of Economics, 1, 451-488.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.050708.142910
[6]  Chetty, R., & Finkelstein, A. (2013). Social Insurance: Connecting Theory to Data. Handbook of Public Economics, 5, 111-193.
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-53759-1.00003-0
[7]  Fredriksson, P., & Holmlund, B. (2001). Optimal Unemployment Insurance in Search Equilibrium. Journal of Labor Economics, 19, 370-399.
https://doi.org/10.1086/319565
[8]  Hopenhayn, H. A., & Nicolini, J. P. (1997). Optimal Unemployment Insurance. Journal of Political Economy, 105, 412-438.
https://doi.org/10.1086/262078
[9]  Hopenhayn, H. A., & Nicolini, J. P. (2009). Optimal Unemployment Insurance and Employment History. Review of Economic Studies, 76, 1049-1070.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937x.2009.00555.x
[10]  Kolsrud, J., Landais, C., Nilsson, P., & Spinnewijn, J. (2018). The Optimal Timing of Unemployment Benefits: Theory and Evidence from Sweden. American Economic Review, 108, 985-1033.
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160816
[11]  Lenaerts, K., Paquier, F., & Simonetta, S. (2017). Unemployment Insurance in America: A Model for Europe? CEEPS Papers 12684, Centre for European Policy Studies.
[12]  Mortensen, D. T. (1977). Unemployment Insurance and Job Search Decisions. ILR Review, 30, 505-517.
https://doi.org/10.1177/001979397703000410
[13]  Pavoni, N., & Violante, G. L. (2007). Optimal Welfare-to-Work Programs. Review of Economic Studies, 74, 283-318.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937x.2007.00422.x
[14]  Potestio, P. (2022). Modelling Unemployment Insurance. Springer.
[15]  Shimer, R., & Werning, I. (2008). Liquidity and Insurance for the Unemployed. American Economic Review, 98, 1922-1942.
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.5.1922

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133