全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

软硬触觉经验对跨期决策的影响——不确定性的中介作用
The Impact of Soft and Hard Tactile Experiences on Intertemporal Decision-Making—The Mediating Role of Uncertainty

DOI: 10.12677/ap.2025.154196, PP. 179-190

Keywords: 具身认知,跨期决策,软硬触觉,不确定性
Embodied Cognition
, Intertemporal Decision-Making, Soft-Hard Tactile Sensation, Uncertainty

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本研究基于具身认知理论,探讨软硬触觉经验对跨期决策的影响,并通过不确定感这一中介变量解释其影响机制。研究1采用单因素两水平被试间设计(软球组、硬球组),以114名成人为研究对象,被试被随机分配至不同的组别并充分按压小球后,通过滴定范式、定价范式测量个体的跨期决策行为;研究2以111名成人作为研究对象,以物体的软硬程度及作答环境中的座椅柔软度为自变量,不确定感为中介变量,并使用滴定范式测量跨期决策行为。研究1的结果显示,软硬触觉体验显著影响个体的跨期决策。研究2通过证明触觉体验影响个体不确定感进而影响决策行为,揭示了其背后的心理机制。
This study, grounded in embodied cognition theory, examines the effects of soft and hard tactile experiences on intertemporal decision-making, focusing on the mediating role of uncertainty. Study 1 employed a single-factor, two-level between-subjects design with 114 adult participants, who were randomly assigned to either a soft ball group or a hard ball group. After engaging in tactile manipulation by pressing the balls, participants’ intertemporal decision-making was assessed using titration and valuation paradigms. Study 2 involved 111 participants, manipulating the softness and hardness of various objects and the cushioning of seating as independent variables while using uncertainty as a mediating variable. The titration paradigm was utilized to measure intertemporal decision-making behavior. Study 1 found that tactile sensations significantly influenced intertemporal decision-making. Study 2 revealed the underlying psychological mechanisms, demonstrating that these tactile experiences impacted decision-making processes by altering individuals’ perceptions of uncertainty.

References

[1]  陈海贤, 何贵兵(2011). 识解水平对跨期选择和风险选择的影响. 心理学报, 43(4), 442-452.
[2]  崔倩, 叶浩生(2013). 触觉经验对性别分类的影响: 具身的视角. 广州大学学报(社会科学版), 12(3), 41-45.
[3]  邓奥(2016). 触觉经验对经济决策的影响. 硕士学位论文, 成都: 四川师范大学.
[4]  蒋元萍, 孙红月(2019). 情绪对跨期决策的影响. 心理科学进展, 27(9), 1622-1630.
[5]  李洁, 黄仁辉, 曾晓青(2015). 不确定性容忍度对跨期选择的影响及其情景依赖性. 心理科学, 38(3), 680-685.
[6]  马文娟, 索涛, 李亚丹, 罗笠铢, 冯廷勇, 李红(2012). 得失框架效应的分离——来自收益与损失型跨期选择的研究. 心理学报, 44(8), 1038-1046.
[7]  温忠麟, 王一帆, 马鹏, 孟进(2024). 变量之间的影响关系和多重影响因素的共同作用类型. 心理学报, 56(10), 1462-1470.
[8]  温忠麟, 叶宝娟(2014). 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731-745.
[9]  吴莉娟, 王佳宁, 齐晓栋(2016). 简版无法忍受不确定性量表在中学生中应用的效度和信度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 30(9), 700-705.
[10]  吴旭瑶(2021). 不确定感对跨期决策的影响. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 华中师范大学.
[11]  夏琳(2021). 权力稳定性对合作行为的影响: 不确定感的中介作用和认知闭合需要的调节作用. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 湖北大学.
[12]  徐岚, 陈全, 崔楠, 陆凯丽(2019). 享受当下, 还是留待未来?——时间观对跨期决策的影响. 心理学报, 51(1), 96-105.
[13]  易仲怡, 杨文登, 叶浩生(2018). 具身认知视角下软硬触觉经验对性别角色认知的影响. 心理学报, 50(7), 793-802.
[14]  张耕, 刘震宇(2010). 在线消费者感知不确定性及其影响因素的作用. 南开管理评论, 13(5), 99-106.
[15]  张夏恒(2020). 新冠肺炎疫情对我国中小微企业的影响及应对. 中国流通经济, 34(3), 26-34.
[16]  周蕾, 林浇敏, 陈艺琦, 梁泳超, 古晨妍, 孙祺章(2024). 不确定性跨期决策视角下绿色行为的心理机制及干预. 心理科学进展, 32(7), 1048-1056.
[17]  Ackerman, J. M., Nocera, C. C., & Bargh, J. A. (2010). Incidental Haptic Sensations Influence Social Judgments and Decisions. Science, 328, 1712-1715.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189993
[18]  Anderson, M. L. (2007). How to Study the Mind: An Introduction to Embodied Cognition. In F. Santoianni & C. Sabatano (Eds.), Brain Development in Learning Environments: Embodied and Perceptual Advancements (pp. 65-82). Cambridge Scholars Press.
[19]  Barkley, R. A., Edwards, G., Laneri, M., Fletcher, K., & Metevia, L. (2001). Executive Functioning, Temporal Discounting, and Sense of Time in Adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 541-556.
https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012233310098
[20]  Boon-Falleur, M., Baumard, N., & André, J. (2021). Risk-Seeking or Impatient? Disentangling Variance and Time in Hazardous Behaviors. Evolution and Human Behavior, 42, 453-460.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.04.001
[21]  Bowlby, J. (1951). Maternal Care and Mental Health (Vol. 2). World Health Organization.
[22]  Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Zapata, C. P., & Rich, B. L. (2012). Explaining the Justice-Performance Relationship: Trust as Exchange Deepener or Trust as Uncertainty Reducer? Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025208
[23]  De Cremer, D., & Sedikides, C. (2009). The Whys and Whens of Personal Uncertainty. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 218-220.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903333437
[24]  Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’donoghue, T. (2002). Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351-401.
https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.40.2.351
[25]  Ge, X. (2023). Experimentally Manipulating Mediating Processes: Why and How to Examine Mediation Using Statistical Moderation Analyses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 109, Article 104507.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104507
[26]  Hardisty, D. J., Appelt, K. C., & Weber, E. U. (2013). Good or Bad, We Want It Now: Fixed‐Cost Present Bias for Gains and Losses Explains Magnitude Asymmetries in Intertemporal Choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 348-361.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1771
[27]  Hartley, C. A., & Phelps, E. A. (2012). Anxiety and Decision-Making. Biological Psychiatry, 72, 113-118.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.12.027
[28]  Hertenstein, M. J., Verkamp, J. M., Kerestes, A. M., & Holmes, R. M. (2006). The Communicative Functions of Touch in Humans, Nonhuman Primates, and Rats: A Review and Synthesis of the Empirical Research. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 5-94.
https://doi.org/10.3200/mono.132.1.5-94
[29]  Ikeda, T., & Takeda, Y. (2024). Haptic Sensations Modulate Judgment of Words That Elicit Self‐Referent Memory. Japanese Psychological Research.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12532
[30]  Kidd, C., Palmeri, H., & Aslin, R. N. (2013). Rational Snacking: Young Children’s Decision-Making on the Marshmallow Task Is Moderated by Beliefs about Environmental Reliability. Cognition, 126, 109-114.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.004
[31]  Kim, B. K., & Zauberman, G. (2013). Can Victoria’s Secret Change the Future? A Subjective Time Perception Account of Sexual-Cue Effects on Impatience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 328-335.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028954
[32]  Kim, S., Hwang, J., & Lee, D. (2008). Prefrontal Coding of Temporally Discounted Values during Intertemporal Choice. Neuron, 59, 161-172.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.05.010
[33]  Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (1999). Heroin Addicts Have Higher Discount Rates for Delayed Rewards than Non-Drug-Using Controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 78-87.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.128.1.78
[34]  Kyu Kim, B., Zauberman, G., & Bettman, J. R. (2012). Space, Time, and Intertemporal Preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 867-880.
https://doi.org/10.1086/666464
[35]  Levav, J., & Argo, J. J. (2010). Physical Contact and Financial Risk Taking. Psychological Science, 21, 804-810.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610369493
[36]  Mazur, J. E. (1984). Tests of an Equivalence Rule for Fixed and Variable Reinforcer Delays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 426-436.
https://doi.org/10.1037//0097-7403.10.4.426
[37]  Rachlin, H., & Jones, B. A. (2008). Social Discounting and Delay Discounting. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 29-43.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.567
[38]  Read, D., Frederick, S., & Scholten, M. (2013). DRIFT: An Analysis of Outcome Framing in Intertemporal Choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 573-588.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029177
[39]  Schaefer, M., Cherkasskiy, L., Denke, C., Spies, C., Song, H., Malahy, S. et al. (2018). Incidental Haptic Sensations Influence Judgment of Crimes. Scientific Reports, 8, Article No. 6039.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23586-x
[40]  Sorrentino, R. M., Short, J. C., & Raynor, J. O. (1984). Uncertainty Orientation: Implications for Affective and Cognitive Views of Achievement Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 189-206.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.189
[41]  Spackman, J. S., & Yanchar, S. C. (2014). Embodied Cognition, Representationalism, and Mechanism: A Review and Analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 44, 46-79.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12028
[42]  Stanley Budner, N. Y. (1962). Intolerance of Ambiguity as a Personality Variable1. Journal of Personality, 30, 29-50.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1962.tb02303.x
[43]  Strack, F. (2013). The Different Routes to Social Judgments: Experiential versus Informational Strategies. In L. L. Martin, & A. Tesser (Eds.), The Construction of Social Judgments (pp. 249-275). Psychology Press.
[44]  Van Horen, F., & Mussweiler, T. (2014). Soft Assurance: Coping with Uncertainty through Haptic Sensations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 73-80.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.008
[45]  Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133