|
|
ESG表现对企业风险的影响研究——来自中国A股上市企业的证据
|
Abstract:
在全球可持续发展理念深入推进的背景下，环境、社会与治理(ESG)表现已成为企业运营的重要考量因素。本文以2009年至2023年沪深A股上市企业为研究对象，探讨了ESG表现对企业风险的抑制作用及其作用机制。研究结果发现，良好的ESG表现能够显著降低企业风险，这一结论在经过一系列内生性检验和稳健性测试后依然稳健。机制检验表明，ESG表现通过缓解企业的融资约束和代理问题，从而有效降低企业风险。本研究为理解ESG表现对企业风险的影响提供了新的经验证据，并为推动企业可持续发展和风险管理提供了实践指导。
Against the backdrop of the deepening promotion of the global concept of sustainable development, environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance has become an important consideration for corporate operations. This paper takes Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2009 to 2023 as the research object, and explores the inhibitory effect of ESG performance on corporate risk and its mechanism of action. The results show that good ESG performance can significantly reduce corporate risk, and this conclusion remains robust after a series of endogeneity tests and robustness tests. Mechanism tests show that ESG performance effectively reduces corporate risk by alleviating corporate financing constraints and agency problems. This study provides new empirical evidence for understanding the impact of ESG performance on corporate risk, and provides practical guidance for promoting corporate sustainable development and risk management.
| [1] | 方先明, 胡丁. 企业ESG表现与创新——来自A股上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(2): 91-106. |
| [2] | 李井林, 阳镇, 陈劲. ESG表现如何赋能企业绿色技术创新?——来自中国上市公司的微观证据[J]. 管理工程学报, 2024, 38(5): 1-17. |
| [3] | 李甜甜, 李金甜. 绿色治理如何赋能高质量发展: 基于ESG履责和全要素生产率关系的解释[J]. 会计研究, 2023(6): 78-98. |
| [4] | 王波, 杨茂佳. ESG表现对企业价值的影响机制研究——来自我国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 软科学, 2022, 36(6): 78-84. |
| [5] | 李增福, 冯柳华. 企业ESG表现与商业信用获取[J]. 财经研究, 2022, 48(12): 151-165. |
| [6] | 邱牧远, 殷红. 生态文明建设背景下企业ESG表现与融资成本[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2019, 36(3): 108-123. |
| [7] | 王翌秋, 谢萌. ESG信息披露对企业融资成本的影响——基于中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 南开经济研究, 2022(11): 75-94. |
| [8] | 谢红军, 吕雪. 负责任的国际投资: ESG与中国OFDI [J]. 经济研究, 2022, 57(3): 83-99. |
| [9] | Ashwin Kumar, N.C., Smith, C., Badis, L., Wang, N., Ambrosy, P. and Tavares, R. (2016) ESG Factors and Risk-Adjusted Performance: A New Quantitative Model. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 6, 292-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2016.1234909 |
| [10] | 李晓艳, 张健华, 王哲. ESG表现与股价稳定性､股票流动性——基于A股上市公司的实证研究[J]. 金融论坛, 2023(4): 33-42. |
| [11] | Hong, H. and Kacperczyk, M. (2009) The Price of Sin: The Effects of Social Norms on Markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93, 15-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.001 |
| [12] | Jagannathan, R., Malakhov, A. and Novikov, D. (2018) Environmental, Social, and Governance Criteria: Why Investors Should Care. Journal of Investment Management, 16, 18-31. |
| [13] | Li, H., Zhang, W. and Wang, Q. (2022) Research on the Impact of ESG Rating on Corporate Default Risk. Journal of Risk Management, 2, 30-37. |
| [14] | 谭劲松, 黄仁玉, 张京心. ESG表现与企业风险——基于资源获取视角的解释[J]. 管理科学, 2022, 35(5): 3-18. |
| [15] | 黄世忠. 支撑ESG的三大理论支柱[J]. 财会月刊, 2021(19): 3-10. |
| [16] | Jones, T.M. (1995) Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 404-437. https://doi.org/10.2307/258852 |
| [17] | 李俊成, 彭俞超, 王文蔚. 绿色信贷政策能否促进绿色企业发展?——基于风险承担的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2023(3): 112-130. |
| [18] | 甄红线, 张先治, 迟国泰. 制度环境､终极控制权对公司绩效的影响——基于代理成本的中介效应检验[J]. 金融研究, 2015(12): 162-177. |
| [19] | Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986) The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 |
| [20] | 董小红, 孙政汉. 化险为夷还是弄巧成拙: ESG表现能降低企业经营风险吗? [J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2023(7): 57-67. |
| [21] | 蒋艺翅, 姚树洁. ESG信息披露､外部关注与企业风险[J]. 系统管理学报, 2024, 33(1): 214-229. |
| [22] | 江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5): 100-120. |
