Electro-Equiscope therapy is an advanced dynamic bioimpedance-guided microcurrent technology designed for pain management, functional rehabilitation, and inflammation reduction in both human and equine patients. Given the increasing demand for non-invasive, drug-free pain relief, this study evaluates the clinical efficacy of Electro-Equiscope therapy in improving pain scores, mobility, and quality of life outcomes. Methods: This observational study analyzed survey data regarding 58 respondents (38 human, 20 equine) who underwent Electro-Equiscope therapy. Pain levels were assessed pre- and post-treatment using a Likert scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 6 (severe pain/lameness), and statistical significance was determined via paired t-tests and confidence interval (CI) analysis. Additional qualitative reports on functional improvement, mood, inflammation reduction, and unexpected outcomes were collected and analyzed. Results: Electro-Equiscope therapy resulted in a statistically significant reduction in pain scores (p < 0.00001, t = 11.56) across both human and equine groups. The mean pain level for humans decreased from 4.58 to 2.30, which is a 49.8% reduction. The mean lameness score for horses dropped from 4.35 to 1.45, which is a 66.7% reduction. Substantial long-term pain relief was reported (80% in horses, 60% in humans). Functional improvements were observed in 95% of both groups, including increased mobility, faster recovery, and enhanced daily function. Stress reduction was notable, with 82% of humans and 95% of horses experiencing decreased anxiety and tension. High satisfaction rates were reported, with 100% of horse owners and 92% of human participants recommending the therapy, with no adverse reports. Conclusion: The findings suggest that Electro-Equiscope therapy is a promising non-invasive modality for pain relief and functional recovery in both human and equine applications. The statistically significant improvements in pain reduction, mobility, and quality of life highlight its potential as an adjunctive pain management strategy. However, further standardized and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to validate its mechanisms, optimize treatment protocols, and establish long-term efficacy.
Cheng, N., van Hoof, H., Bockx, E., Hoogmartens, M.J., Mulier, J.C., De Dijcker, F.J., et al. (1982) The Effects of Electric Currents on ATP Generation, Protein Synthesis, and Membrane Transport in Rat Skin. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 171, 264-272. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198211000-00045
[4]
Kolimechkov, S., Seijo, M., Swaine, I., Thirkell, J., Colado, J.C. and Naclerio, F. (2022) Physiological Effects of Microcurrent and Its Application for Maximising Acute Responses and Chronic Adaptations to Exercise. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 123, 451-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-05097-w
[5]
Zhou, Z., Xue, Y., Zhao, Y., Mu, X. and Xu, L. (2023) Effects of Microcurrent Therapy in Promoting Function and Pain Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol. BMJ Open, 13, e069036. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069036
[6]
Lawson, D., Lee, K.H., Kang, H.B., Yang, N., Llewellyn, T. and Takamatsu, S. (2020) Efficacy of Microcurrent Therapy for Treatment of Acute Knee Pain: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Clinical Trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 35, 390-398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215520965320
[7]
Petrofsky, J.S., Lee, S. and Coldwells, A. (2021) Electrical Microcurrent Stimulation Therapy for Wound Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Advances in Wound Care (New Rochelle), 10, 231-245.
[8]
Avendaño-Coy, J., Martín-Espinosa, N.M., Ladriñán-Maestro, A., Gómez-Soriano, J., Suárez-Miranda, M.I. and López-Muñoz, P. (2022) Effectiveness of Microcurrent Therapy for Treating Pressure Ulcers in Older People: A Double-Blind, Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, Article 10045. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610045
[9]
Yoshikawa, Y., Hiramatsu, T., Sugimoto, M., Uemura, M., Mori, Y. and Ichibori, R. (2022) Efficacy of Low-Frequency Monophasic Pulsed Microcurrent Stimulation Therapy in Undermining Pressure Injury: A Double-Blind Crossover-Controlled Study. Progress in Rehabilitation Medicine, 7, Article ID: 20220045. https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20220045
[10]
Lennox, A.J., Shafer, J.P., Hatcher, M., Beil, J. and Funder, S.J. (2002) Pilot Study of Impedance-Controlled Microcurrent Therapy for Managing Radiation-Induced Fibrosis in Head-And-Neck Cancer Patients. International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics, 54, 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02898-5
[11]
Bertolucci, L.E. and Grey, T. (1995) Clinical Comparative Study of Microcurrent Electrical Stimulation to Mid-Laser and Placebo Treatment in Degenerative Joint Disease of the Temporomandibular Joint. Cranio, 13, 116-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.1995.11678054
[12]
Bergström, H., Björnsdóttir, S., Ekman, S., et al. (2023) A Systematic Review of Complementary and Alternative Veterinary Medicine: “Miscellaneous Therapies”. Animals (Basel), 11, Article 3356.
[13]
Dyson, S. and Pollard, D. (2021) The Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Back Pain in Polo Ponies—A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, 103, Article ID: 103643.
[14]
Sundaram, M and Galuppo, L.D. (2021) Microcurrent Therapy in Equine Rehabilitation: Mechanisms and Clinical Applications. Veterinary Journal of Equine Medcine, 9, 188-202.
[15]
Intelligent Bioenergetics (2024) Case Studies and Clinical Applications of Electro-Equiscope Therapy. Intelligent Bioenergetics News Library. https://intellbio.com/news-library/