|
“下学而上达”何以可能?——“心”的三重诠释
|
Abstract:
“下学而上达”被儒学视作人成就德性的必经之路。“下学”指向形而下的洒扫应对进退之事;“上达”指向形而上的德性之知、天理天命。前者是具体而微的行动,能够为感官所把握;后者是蕴藏在事物背后、为人处世的根本道理,不能为感官所把握。两者二者界限分明,“学”何以能够“达”?对此,如何理解“下学”和“上达”两者之间的关系就显得尤为重要。“下学”对应的具体之事是其然,“上达”对应的无形之道是所以然,所以然蕴含在其然之中。“心”是中国哲学的重要范畴,能够为“下学而上达”的贯通做出阐释。一则,它包含了情感的部分,是“下学”之行为的动力源泉。二则,它能随物而感,随感而应,为形而下与形而上的连接创造了条件,搭建了桥梁。三则,它具有“思”的官能,可以将具体的形而下条理化为抽象的形而上,从而实现“下学上达”之飞跃。
In Confucianism, the principle of “xia-xue and shang-da” is regarded as an essential path to achieving moral virtue. “Xia-xue” refers to concrete, mundane practices such as daily rituals, social interactions, and ethical conduct—actions graspable through sensory experience. “Shang-da”, by contrast, signifies metaphysical knowledge of virtue and alignment with cosmic principles or heavenly mandate, which transcend sensory perception. While these two domains appear distinct, the question arises: How can “learning” lead to “attainment”? Resolving these hinges on clarifying their relationship. Xia-xue pertains to “what is so”, the observable phenomena, while shang-da corresponds to “why it is so”, the underlying principles embedded within phenomena. The “xin”, a central concept in Chinese philosophy, bridges this divide through three dimensions: Firstly, affective Motivation: The xin generates emotional drive, fueling xia-xue’s practical actions. Secondly, responsive Mediation: The xin perceives and responds to phenomena, creating a bridge between the concrete and the abstract. Thirdly, reflective Transcendence: The xin’s faculty of reflection transforms mundane experiences into abstract moral principles, enabling the leap from xia-xue and shang-da.
[1] | 刘付华东. 下学上达: 朱熹道德-形上学的能力之知探究[J]. 中共宁波市委党校学报, 2022, 44(2): 20-27. |
[2] | 李敬峰. 明体而达用与下学而上达——再论二程心性论思想的差异[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 44(2): 104-109. |
[3] | 周勤勤. “知行合一”与“下学上达”——王阳明与方以智比较研究[J]. 王学研究, 2018(2): 143-154. |
[4] | 朱人求. 下学而上达——朱子小学与大学的贯通[J]. 江南大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2013, 12(2): 5-10. |
[5] | 朱熹. 四书章句集注[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2011. |
[6] | (明)王守仁. 王文成公全书(第一册) [M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2015. |
[7] | 黄勇, 崔雅琴(译). 论王阳明的良知概念: 命题性知识, 能力之知, 抑或动力之知? [J]. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(1): 49-66. |
[8] | 郁振华. 论道德-形上学的能力之知——基于赖尔与王阳明的探讨[J]. 中国社会科学, 2014(12): 22-41, 205-206. |
[9] | (宋)黎靖德, 编, 王星贤, 点校. 朱子语类(二) [M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2020: 413. |
[10] | 张再林. 作为“身体哲学”的中国古代哲学[J]. 人文杂志, 2005(2): 28-31. |
[11] | 冯契. 冯契文集(增订版)第一卷: 认识世界和认识自己[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2015. |
[12] | 王夫之. 船山全书(第十二册) [M]. 长沙: 岳麓书社, 2005: 143-144. |
[13] | (清)戴震. 戴震集[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2009. |
[14] | (宋)陆九渊. 陆九渊全集[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2023: 396. |