Transboundary pollution refers to environmental contaminants originating within one country but affecting ecosystems, economies, and communities across borders. This global issue, driven by industrial emissions, hazardous waste disposal, and other pollutants, requires collective international action. The consequences, such as acid rain, ozone depletion, and biodiversity loss, are often most severely felt by developing nations, which lack the resources to combat these challenges effectively. Despite the global nature of transboundary pollution, the issue disproportionately impacts developing nations like Nigeria, which face significant environmental and socio-economic consequences. One example of this vulnerability is the infamous Koko toxic waste incident in Nigeria, which highlighted the environmental exploitation of African countries. The lack of effective legal frameworks and culturally informed responses exacerbates these issues, making it urgent to explore alternative solutions. This paper examines how countries have responded to transboundary pollution, with a particular focus on the Koko toxic waste dump in Nigeria. It aims to explore the role of indigenous knowledge and African cultural values in shaping responses to environmental crises and how these can be integrated into modern environmental governance. This paper employs a qualitative analysis of laws and published materials on the responses of countries to transboundary pollution, focusing on the Koko toxic waste incident. Data is collected from academic literature, legal frameworks, and cultural insights to explore how indigenous values and modern legal systems can complement each other in addressing environmental issues. The study draws on the principles of environmental justice, focusing on the inequities faced by developing nations. It also integrates the concept of Ubuntu in South Africa and communal environmental stewardship in Nigeria, as alternative approaches to traditional environmental governance. The work concludes that indigenous knowledge systems and African cultural values could offer innovative solutions to the global challenge of transboundary pollution. This paper hence highlights the importance of these strategies in fostering sustainable development and offering valuable lessons for global efforts to combat transboundary pollution.
References
[1]
Adeola, F. O. (2001). Environmental Injustice and Human Rights Abuse: The States, MNCs, and Repression of Minority Groups in the World System. Human EcologyReview, 8, 39-59. https://www.humanecologyreview.org/pastissues/her81/81adeola.pdf
[2]
Adeoluwa, R. O. (2017). An Examination of Customary Practices Related to Environmental Protection in Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Human Developments, 3, 38-45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327720498_An_Examination_of_Customary_Practices_Related_to_Environmental_Protection_in_Nigeria
[3]
Anyachebelu, N. C. (2024). Access to Environmental Justice: Challenges and Solutions in Developing Countries. International Journal of Research and Publication,5. https://ijorp.org/project/Access_to_environmental_justice.pdf
[4]
Anyinam, C. (1991). Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes: The Case of Toxic Waste Dumping in Africa. International Journal of Health Services, 21, 759-777. https://doi.org/10.2190/XQVC-1HD5-8LN7-MH3D
[5]
Dlamini, Z., Nzimande, N., Biyase, M., & Khobai, H. (2022). Carbon Emissions and Growth: The Role of Trade and Urbanization in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14, 605-614. https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/15940
[6]
European Economic Community and African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (1975). The Lomé Convention: Framework for Cooperation between ACP Countries and the European Community. https://www.eumonitor.eu
[7]
Eze, S., Besong, B., & Efenji, J. (2021). Environmental Crisis and the Quest for Effective Leadership in Africa. Open Wisdom Journal of Philosophy and Public Affairs, 3, 45-60. https://www.acjol.org/index.php/owijoppa/article/download/3688/3611
[8]
Ireland, G., & Burton, J. (2018). An Assessment of New Coal Plants in South Africa’s Electricity Future: The Cost, Emissions, and Supply Security Implications of the Coal IPP Programme. https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/ERC-Coal-IPP-Study-Report-Finalv2-290518.pdf
[9]
Nahar, N., Mahiuddin, S., & Hossain, Z. (2021). The Severity of Environmental Pollution in Developing Countries and Its Remedial Measures. Earth, 2, 124-139. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth2010008
[10]
Ogbodo, S. G. (2009). Environmental Protection in Nigeria: Two Decades After the Koko Incident. Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, 15, Article 2. https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/annlsurvey/vol15/iss1/2/
[11]
Olawuyi, D. S. (2015). The Principles of Nigerian Environmental Law (p. 37). Afe Babalola University Printing Press.
[12]
Organization of African Unity (1968). African Convention on the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. https://www.au.int/en/treaties/african-convention-conservation-nature-and-natural-resources
[13]
Scielo (2009). Zulu Communal Water Management and Environmental Governance. https://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?pid=S1816-79502009000500018&script=sci_arttext
[14]
Secretariat of the Basel Convention (1989). Basel Convention: The Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal. http://www.basel.int
[15]
Southern African Development Community (SADC) (2014). Protocol on Environmental Management for Sustainable Development. https://www.sadc.int/documents-publications
[16]
Umukoro, B. E., & Omozue, M. O. (2024). Environmental Protection and the Role of National Policies and Guidelines in Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, 4, 211–234. https://grassrootsjournals.org/jelp/jelp04.02.08-umukoro-omozue.pdf
[17]
United Nations (UN) (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). https://unfccc.int