|
论数据知识产权的法律定位、权利本质和审查模式
|
Abstract:
数据知识产权是对数据权益的特有保护,具有赋权属性。数据知识产权客体是合法取得在先权益后,经一定算法加工处理的、具有商业价值和创造性成果属性的衍生性数据产品,具有非物质性、非竞争性、只能达成观念控制上的占有等特性。数据知识产权属于数据产权制度的一环,与“数据三权”中的数据产品经营权的权能相近,在位阶上应属于数据产品经营权的下位概念,两者是一般法与特别法的关系:对于符合创造性的衍生型数据产品优先采用数据知识产权制度保护,数据产品经营权给予兜底性保护。观察实践中的数据产品所有权,其本质也是无形财产权在知识产权框架下的重申。在数据知识产权的审查模式上,结合试点省市的数据知识产权登记制度,从数据知识产权的公开范围和界权成本衡量的两个方面考虑,我国应当采取形式审查模式。
Data intellectual property rights are unique protection of data rights and interests, and have empowering attributes. The object of data intellectual property rights is a derivative data product with commercial value and creative achievement attributes that has been processed by a certain algorithm after lawfully obtaining prior rights and interests, and has the characteristics of non-materiality, non-competition, and possession that can only achieve conceptual control. Data intellectual property rights belong to a part of the data property rights system, which is similar to the power of the data product management right in the “three rights of data”, and should belong to the subordinate concept of the data product management right in terms of hierarchy, and the relationship between the two is the relationship between the general law and the special law: for derivative data products that meet the creative requirements, the data intellectual property system protection is preferred, and the data product management right is given comprehensive protection. The essence of the ownership of data products in observation practice is also the reaffirmation of intangible property rights under the framework of intellectual property rights. In terms of the examination mode of data intellectual property rights, combined with the data intellectual property registration systems of pilot provinces and cities, China should adopt the formal examination model from two aspects: the scope of disclosure of data intellectual property rights and the measurement of the cost of boundary rights.
[1] | 李爱君. 数据权利属性与法律特征[J]. 东方法学, 2018(3): 64-74. |
[2] | 黄源, 蒋文豪, 徐受蓉, 主编. 大数据分析: Python爬虫、数据清洗和数据可视化[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2020: 10. |
[3] | 崔国斌. 大数据有限排他权的基础理论[J]. 法学研究, 2019, 41(5): 3-24. |
[4] | 高富平. 数据知识产权保护论纲[J]. 数字法治, 2024(2): 1-17. |
[5] | 齐爱民, 著. 数据法原理[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2022: 135-137. |
[6] | 熊丙万, 何娟. 数据确权: 理路、方法与经济意义[J]. 法学研究, 2023, 45(3): 54-72. |
[7] | 熊丙万. 论数据权利的标准化[J]. 中外法学, 2023, 35(5): 1145-1164. |
[8] | 叶敏, 范馨允. 数据产品经营权的生成逻辑与权利架构[J]. 数字法治, 2023(6): 158-174. |
[9] | 王泽鉴, 著. 民法物权[M]. 第2版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2010: 597. |
[10] | 姚佳. 企业数据权益: 控制、排他性与可转让性[J]. 法学评论, 2023, 41(4): 149-159. |
[11] | 顾培东, 著. 法学与经济学的探索[M]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学出版社, 1994: 104. |
[12] | [苏联]E.A. 鲍加特赫, 等. 资本主义国家和发展中国家的专利法[M]//中国科学技术情报所专利馆, 编, 译. 国外专利法介绍. 北京: 知识出版社, 1980: 2. |
[13] | 吴汉东, 主编. 知识产权法学[M]. 第6版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2014: 161. |
[14] | IDC & Open Evidence (2016) Europe’s Data Market Places: Current Status and Future Perspectives. European Data Market SMART2013/0063D3.9. |
[15] | Jim, B. (2023) What Are Information Costs? WISEGEEK. https://www.wise-geek.com/what-are-information-costs.htm |
[16] | 刘建臣. 数据知识产权登记的底层逻辑[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2024, 27(6): 79-93. |