庄子理想人格论分析：郭齐勇与冯友兰的认识差异
Analysis of Zhuangzi’s Ideal Personality Theory: Differences in Understanding between Guo Qiyong and Feng Youlan

庄子是我国战国时期一位著名的思想家，是先秦道家的集大成者。《庄子》一书是中国哲学史和中国文学史上的奇葩，是一份十分珍贵的文化遗产。作为我国古代最重要的思想家之一，庄子的理想人格论是启发后续哲学家思考人生的重要宝藏。庄子以其“道”作为世界的本原，用“心斋”、“坐忘”等方式达到无我之境，借此去往“逍遥”。对此我国哲学家郭齐永和冯友兰先生在他们的《中国哲学史》里有着不同的看法。本文将基于二者《中国哲学史》的原著进行文本分析，比较二者对庄子理想人格论的不同看法。
Zhuangzi was a famous philosopher during the Warring States period in China and the culmination of pre Qin Taoism. The book Zhuangzi is a rare and precious cultural heritage in the history of Chinese philosophy and literature. As one of the most important thinkers in ancient China, Zhuangzi’s theory of ideal personality is an important treasure that inspires subsequent philosophers to think about life. Zhuangzi regards his “Dao” as the origin of the world, and achieves the state of selflessness through methods such as “mind fasting” and “sitting and forgetting”, in order to go to “carefree”. Chinese philosophers Guo Qiyong and Feng Youlan have different views on this in their “History of Chinese Philosophy”. This article will conduct text analysis based on the original works of two books, “A History of Chinese Philosophy”, and compare their different views on Zhuangzi’s theory of ideal personality.