全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Divide and Rule: The Unintended Impact of Paris Agreement Differentiation on LDCs from Africa in Their Climate Diplomacy and Negotiations in the UNFCCC Process

DOI: 10.4236/ajcc.2025.141006, PP. 93-118

Keywords: Paris Agreement, LDCs, G77 and China, Ambition, Negotiation, Diplomacy, AGN, Differentiation, Unity, Solidarity, Kyoto Protocol, Africa

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The Paris Agreement’s differentiation architecture is a key feature of the international climate regime, enabling countries to submit climate action plans based on their unique national circumstances. The study is designed to investigate the impact of the Paris Agreement differentiation architecture on LDCs from Africa engagement in the UNFCCC process. The study adopted an exploratory research design and adopted a census approach to get a sample size of 66 negotiators from 33 LDCs in the Africa Group of Negotiators (AGN) for questionnaire administration. This paper presents part of the results of the research focused on how the Paris Agreement differentiation architecture inadvertently prevails over the unity of the developing countries and consequently drives collective ambition. The study notes the divide and rule elements of the Paris Agreement through strategic coordination challenges between AGN and LDCs from Africa; the LDCs from Africa’s divergent interests from AGN and G77 and China; and the LDCs’ appropriation of new friends and partnerships. Consequently, LDCs from Africa are covertly and unassumingly redefining the concept of climate justice by transcending the traditional divide between developed and developing countries that characterized the pre-Paris climate regime in calling for accountability for climate action. The study reveals that the Paris Agreement differentiation system contributes to the weakening of the unity of developing nations in their negotiations in the UNFCCC process, as revealed by how LDCs from Africa participate in the climate negotiations under the current climate regime. The study further found that LDCs from Africa’s positions and tactics differ from those of other developing countries by opting to use non-state actors and sometimes collaborating with developed countries. LDCs from Africa have tactfully been indifferent to Africa Group of Negotiators (AGN) interests such as the African Special Circumstances Agenda. While most developing countries have opposed the agenda, the position taken by LDCs from Africa is interesting because these parties come from AGN, which originated and owns this position. The Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) growing role in climate discussions, with aspirations to become a formal negotiating group, adds to the diplomatic complexity of the developing countries, which is mainly attributable to the Paris Agreement differentiation framework. The Paris Agreement has resulted in fractured solidarity among developing nations, with developing

References

[1]  Admin, E. (2022, November 24). COP27: Loss and Damage Fund Agreed to at Egypts Climate Summit. E Co.
https://www.ecoltdgroup.com/loss-and-damage-fund-cop27/
[2]  Allan, J. I., Roger, C. B., Hale, T. N., Bernstein, S., Tiberghien, Y., & Balme, R. (2023). Making the Paris Agreement: Historical Processes and the Drivers of Institutional Design. Political Studies, 71, 914-934.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211049294
[3]  Amitabh, S. (2022, November 10). Asked to Contribute for Loss and Damage, India, China Say Ready but Onus on Developed World First. The Indian Express.
https://indianexpress.com/article/india/asked-to-contribute-for-loss-and-damage-india-china-say-ready-but-onus-on-developed-world-first-8259619/
[4]  Andrei, S., Tenzing, J., Craft, B., & Abeysinghe, A. (2016). A Study of LDC Capacity at the UNFCCC: Engaging in Negotiations and Interpreting Outcomes. International Institute for Environment and Development.
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17387.13600
[5]  Bardhan, P. K. (2022). A World of Insecurity: Democratic Disenchantment in Rich and Poor Countries. Harvard University Press.
[6]  Barrios, S., Bertinelli, L., & Strobl, E. (2006). Climatic Change and Rural-Urban Migration: The Case of Sub-Saharan Africa. SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.925652
[7]  Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey Response Rate Levels and Trends in Organizational Research. Human Relations, 61, 1139-1160.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863
[8]  Bernardo, C. S., Endalew, G. J., Namgyel, T., & Gebreyes, B. Y. (2020). Least Developed Countries (LDCs). In M. D. P. Bueno Rubial, & L. Siegele (Eds.), Negotiating Climate Change Adaptation (pp. 61-71). Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41021-6_6
[9]  Betzold, C. (2015). Adapting to Climate Change in Small Island Developing States. Climatic Change, 133, 481-489.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1408-0
[10]  Bhaskar, S., & Manjuladevi, M. (2016). Methodology for Research II. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 60, 646-651.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.190620
[11]  Bocquillon, P., & Maltby, T. (2024). The Challenge of Ratcheting up Climate Ambitions: Implementing the “Experimentalist” EU Energy and Climate Governance Regulation. Environmental Politics.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2024.2386796
[12]  Bodansky, D. (2016). The Paris Climate Change Agreement: A New Hope? American Journal of International Law, 110, 288-319.
https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.110.2.0288
[13]  Chan, N. (2021). “Special Circumstances” and the Politics of Climate Vulnerability: African Agency in the UN Climate Change Negotiations. Africa Spectrum, 56, 314-332.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0002039721991151
[14]  Chin-Yee, S. (2016). Briefing: Africa and the Paris Climate Change Agreement. African Affairs, 115, 359-368.
https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adw005
[15]  Ciplet, D., Roberts, J. T., & Khan, M. R. (2015). Power in a Warming World: The New Global Politics of Climate Change and the Remaking of Environmental Inequality. The MIT Press.
[16]  de Vylder, S. (2001). The Least Developed Countries and World Trade. Sida.
[17]  Dingwerth, K. (2024). Multi-Layered Differentiation in the Climate Regime: The Gradual Path from Rio to Paris. Environmental Politics, 33, 240-258.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2023.2210488
[18]  Dr. Swarooprani, K. (2022). An Study of Research Methodology. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 9, 537-543.
https://doi.org/10.32628/ijsrset2293175
[19]  Eckersley, R. (2020). Rethinking Leadership: Understanding the Roles of the US and China in the Negotiation of the Paris Agreement. European Journal of International Relations, 26, 1178-1202.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120927071
[20]  Eweje, G. (2006). Environmental Costs and Responsibilities Resulting from Oil Exploitation in Developing Countries: The Case of the Niger Delta of Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 27-56.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9067-8
[21]  Falkner, R. (2016). The Paris Agreement and the New Logic of International Climate Politics. International Affairs, 92, 1107-1125.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12708
[22]  Farand, C., & Lo, J. (2021, June 10). UK to Provide Covid-19 Vaccines for Cop26 Delegates. Climate Home News.
https://www.climatechangenews.com/2021/06/10/uk-provide-covid-19-vaccines-cop26-delegates/
[23]  Fatou, D. (2023, November 1). Supporting New LDC Negotiators in the UN Climate Negotiations: Whats at Stake.
https://www.iied.org/supporting-new-ldc-negotiators-un-climate-negotiations-whats-stake
[24]  Fialho, D., & Van Bergeijk, P. A. G. (2017). The Proliferation of Developing Country Classifications. The Journal of Development Studies, 53, 99-115.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1178383
[25]  Gupta, J. (2005). International Law and Climate Change: The Challenges Facing Developing Countries. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 16, 119-153.
https://doi.org/10.1093/yiel/16.1.119
[26]  Hale, T. (2016). “All Hands on Deck”: The Paris Agreement and Nonstate Climate Action. Global Environmental Politics, 16, 12-22.
https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00362
[27]  Hansen, M. H., Hurwitz, W. N., Nisselson, H., & Steinberg, J. (1955). The Redesign of the Census Current Population Survey. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 701-719.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1955.10501962
[28]  Havukainen, M., Mikkilä, M., & Kahiluoto, H. (2022). Global Climate as a Commons—Decision Making on Climate Change in Least Developed Countries. Environmental Sci-ence & Policy, 136, 761-771.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.08.003
[29]  Hermwille, L., Obergassel, W., Ott, H. E., & Beuermann, C. (2017). UNFCCC before and after Paris—What’s Necessary for an Effective Climate Regime? Climate Policy, 17, 150-170.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1115231
[30]  Hirsch, T. (2016). The Role of Alliances in International Climate Policy after Paris. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
[31]  Höhne, N., Kuramochi, T., Warnecke, C., Röser, F., Fekete, H., Hagemann, M., Day, T., Tewari, R., Kurdziel, M., Sterl, S., & Gonzales, S. (2017). The Paris Agreement: Re-Solving the Inconsistency between Global Goals and National Contributions. Climate Policy, 17, 16-32.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1218320
[32]  Inception Commission, S. G. (2022). A Proposal to Achieve a Glasgow Agreement: Core Commitments for States on Climate Action to Reach Net Zero by 2050. Edward Elgar Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839100833.00038
[33]  IPCC (2014). AR5 Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability.
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/
[34]  Jiang, C. (2022). Revisiting “Leadership” in Global Climate Governance: China’s Norma-tive Engagement with the CBDRs Principle. The Chinese Journal of International Poli-tics, 15, 183-208.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poac007
[35]  Jilcha Sileyew, K. (2020). Research Design and Methodology. In E. Abu-Taieh, A. El Mouatasim, & I. H. Al Hadid (Eds.), Cyberspace. IntechOpen.
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85731
[36]  Jinnah, S. (2017). Makers, Takers, Shakers, Shapers: Emerging Economies and Normative Engagement in Climate Governance. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 23, 285-306.
https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02302009
[37]  Kasa, S., Gullberg, A. T., & Heggelund, G. (2008). The Group of 77 in the International Climate Negotiations: Recent Developments and Future Directions. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8, 113-127.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-007-9060-4
[38]  Kaya, A., & Schofield, L. S. (2020). Which Countries Send More Delegates to Climate Change Conferences? Analysis of UNFCCC COPs, 1995-2015. Foreign Policy Analysis, 16, 478-491.
https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orz031
[39]  Khan, M. A., & Akhtar, M. S. (2015). Agricultural Adaptation and Climate Change Policy for Crop Production in Africa. In K. R. Hakeem (Ed.), Crop Production and Global Environmental Issues (pp. 437-541). Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23162-4_18
[40]  Kinley, R., Cutajar, M. Z., de Boer, Y., & Figueres, C. (2021). Beyond Good Intentions, to Urgent Action: Former UNFCCC Leaders Take Stock of Thirty Years of International Climate Change Negotiations. Climate Policy, 21, 593-603.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1860567
[41]  Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B., & Schroeder, H. (2018). Non‐State Actors in Hybrid Global Climate Governance: Justice, Legitimacy, and Effectiveness in a Post‐Paris Era. WIREs Climate Change, 9, e497.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.497
[42]  Luomi, M. (2011). Gulf of Interest: Why Oil Still Dominates Middle Eastern Climate Politics. Journal of Arabian Studies, 1, 249-266.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21534764.2011.628499
[43]  Marquardt, J., Fast, C., & Grimm, J. (2022). Non‐ and Sub‐State Climate Action after Paris: From a Facilitative Regime to a Contested Governance Landscape. WIREs Climate Change, 13, e791.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.791
[44]  Mbeva, K. L., & Pauw, P. (2016). Self-Differentiation of Countries’ Responsibilities: Ad-dressing Climate Change through Intended Nationally Determined Contributions. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik.
[45]  McGee, J., & Steffek, J. (2016). The Copenhagen Turn in Global Climate Governance and the Contentious History of Differentiation in International Law. Journal of Environmental Law, 28, 37-63.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqw003
[46]  Mehling, M. A. (2019). Governing Cooperative Approaches under the Paris Agreement. Ecology Law Quarterly, 46, 765-828.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/27069892
[47]  Mills‐Novoa, M., & Liverman, D. M. (2019). Nationally Determined Contributions: Material Climate Commitments and Discursive Positioning in the NDCs. WIREs Climate Change, 10, e589.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.589
[48]  Najam, A., Huq, S., & Sokona, Y. (2003). Climate Negotiations Beyond Kyoto: Developing Countries Concerns and Interests. Climate Policy, 3, 221-231.
https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2003.0329
[49]  Nazareth, A., Kim, D., & Shawoo, Z. (2024). External Power Dynamics and International Climate Governance in a Crises-Constrained World. Climate and Development, 16, 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2024.2330984
[50]  Never, B., & Betz, J. (2014). Comparing the Climate Policy Performance of Emerging Economies. World Development, 59, 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.016
[51]  Northey, J. A. (2013). External Financing of NGOs and the Construction of Civil Society: The Case of Algeria and the EU. European University Institute.
https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2870/573931
[52]  Oberthür, S., & Groen, L. (2017). The European Union and the Paris Agreement: Leader, Mediator, or Bystander? WIREs Climate Change, 8, e445.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.445
[53]  Oberthür, S., & Ott, H. E. (1999). Developing Country Participation (Articles 10, 11). In S. Oberthür, & H. E. Ott (Eds.), The Kyoto Protocol: International Climate Policy for the 21st Century (pp. 225-238). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03925-0_17
[54]  Ourbak, T., & Magnan, A. K. (2018). The Paris Agreement and Climate Change Negotiations: Small Islands, Big Players. Regional Environmental Change, 18, 2201-2207.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1247-9
[55]  Pan, X., Elzen, M. d., Höhne, N., Teng, F., & Wang, L. (2017). Exploring Fair and Ambitious Mitigation Contributions under the Paris Agreement Goals. Environmental Science & Policy, 74, 49-56.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.020
[56]  Pauw, W. P., & Klein, R. J. T. (2020). Beyond Ambition: Increasing the Transparency, Coherence and Implementability of Nationally Determined Contributions. Climate Policy, 20, 405-414.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1722607
[57]  Pickering, J., Betzold, C., & Skovgaard, J. (2017). Special Issue: Managing Fragmentation and Complexity in the Emerging System of International Climate Finance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17, 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9349-2
[58]  Popovski, V. (2019). The Implementation of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
[59]  Pouponneau, A. (2022). “Climate-Displaced People”: A Small Island Developing States Perspective. In S. Behrman, & A. Kent (Eds.), Climate Refugees: Global, Local and Critical Approaches (pp. 231-248). Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108902991.012
[60]  Pulver, S., & Benney, T. (2013). Private‐Sector Responses to Climate Change in the Global South. WIREs Climate Change, 4, 479-496.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.240
[61]  Rajamani, L. (2012). The Changing Fortunes of Differential Treatment in the Evolution of International Environmental Law. International Affairs, 88, 605-623.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01091.x
[62]  Rajamani, L. (2016). The 2015 Paris Agreement: Interplay between Hard, Soft and Non-Obligations: Table 1. Journal of Environmental Law, 28, 337-358.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqw015
[63]  Ray, S., Jain, S., Thakur, V., & Miglani, S. (2023). Political Economy Shapes Strategies of Countries. In S. Ray, S. Jain, V. Thakur, & S. Miglani (Eds.), Global Cooperation and G20 (pp. 43-83). Springer Nature.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7134-1_3
[64]  Rindfuss, R. R., Choe, M. K., Tsuya, N. O., Bumpass, L. L., & Tamaki, E. (2015). Do Low Survey Response Rates Bias Results? Evidence from Japan. Demographic Research, 32, 797-828.
https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2015.32.26
[65]  Roberts, J. T., & Weikmans, R. (2017). Postface: Fragmentation, Failing Trust and Enduring Tensions over What Counts as Climate Finance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17, 129-137.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9347-4
[66]  Saidi, M. D., & Wolf, C. (2011). Recalibrating Development Co-Operation: How Can African Countries Benefit from Emerging Partners? OECD Development Centre Working Papers No. 302.
https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg83kvgnz0v-en
[67]  Savaresi, A. (2016). The Paris Agreement: A New Beginning? Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 34, 16-26.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2016.1133983
[68]  Scotland, J. W. (2021, November 5). Vulnerable Countries Face a Tough Battle to Shape COP26. TIME.
https://time.com/6114143/vulnerable-countries-influence-cop26/
[69]  Snead, D. (2023, October 20). Developed Countries Hold up Negotiations on Loss and Damage Fund as Stalemate on Location of the Fund Undermines Trust. Climate Action Network.
https://climatenetwork.org/2023/10/20/developed-countries-hold-up-negotiations-on-loss-and-damage-fund-as-stalemate-on-location-of-the-fund-undermines-trust/
[70]  Stephenson, S. R., Oculi, N., Bauer, A., & Carhuayano, S. (2019). Convergence and Di-vergence of UNFCCC Nationally Determined Contributions. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109, 1240-1261.
https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1536533
[71]  Stoett, P. J., & Mulligan, S. (2019). Global Ecopolitics: Crisis, Governance, and Justice (2nd ed.). University of Toronto Press.
[72]  Streck, C., Keenlyside, P., & von Unger, M. (2016). The Paris Agreement: A New Beginning. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 13, 3-29.
https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01301002
[73]  Suarez, K. D. (2015, December 9). US Joins Ambition Coalition at UN Climate Talks. Rappler.
https://www.rappler.com/world/global-affairs/115486-cop21-us-joins-ambition-coalition-climate-talks/
[74]  Sweeney, S. (2021). Five Years on, the Paris Climate Agreement Needs an Overhaul. New Labor Forum, 30, 102-109.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796020980166
[75]  Tahiru, A., Sackey, B., Owusu, G., & Bawakyillenuo, S. (2019). Building the Adaptive Capacity for Livelihood Improvements of Sahel Savannah Farmers through Ngo-Led Adaptation Interventions. Climate Risk Management, 26, Article ID: 100197.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2019.100197
[76]  Thakur, S. (2021). From Kyoto to Paris and Beyond: The Emerging Politics of Climate Change. India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, 77, 366-383.
https://doi.org/10.1177/09749284211027252
[77]  Thompson, A. (2020). Emerging Powers and Differentiation in Global Climate Institutions. Global Policy, 11, 61-72.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12883
[78]  UNCTAD (2023). Least Developed Countries Report: Crisis-Resilient Development Finance. United Nations Publication.
https://unctad.org/topic/least-developed-countries/list
[79]  Van Coppenolle, H. (2024). Does the Paris Agreements Pledge-and-Review Process Ratchet up Climate Ambition? A Peer Group Spatial Analysis of Nationally Determined Contributions.
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33345.77923
[80]  Van de Graaf, T. (2017). Is OPEC Dead? Oil Exporters, the Paris Agreement and the Transition to a Post-Carbon World. Energy Research & Social Science, 23, 182-188.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.10.005
[81]  Vanhala, L., & Hestbaek, C. (2016). Framing Climate Change Loss and Damage in UNFCCC Negotiations. Global Environmental Politics, 16, 111-129.
https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00379
[82]  Voigt, C., & Ferreira, F. (2016a). Differentiation in the Paris Agreement. SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2827633
[83]  Voigt, C., & Ferreira, F. (2016b). “Dynamic Differentiation”: The Principles of CBDR-RC, Progression and Highest Possible Ambition in the Paris Agreement. Transnational Environmental Law, 5, 285-303.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s2047102516000212
[84]  Wale-Oshinowo, B. A., Omobowale, A. O., Adeyeye, M. M., & Lebura, S. (2020). Least Developed Countries in Africa. In S. Romaniuk, & P. Marton (Eds.), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Global Security Studies (pp. 1-16). Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74336-3_346-1
[85]  Walsh, E. M. (2022). Justice and Equity in Climate Change Education: Exploring Social and Ethical Dimensions of Environmental Education. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429326011
[86]  Zahar, A. (2016). Climate Change Finance and International Law. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315886008
[87]  Zhang, Y., Chao, Q., Zheng, Q., & Huang, L. (2017). The Withdrawal of the U.S. from the Paris Agreement and Its Impact on Global Climate Change Governance. Advances in Climate Change Research, 8, 213-219.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2017.08.005

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133