全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

假冒专利罪的适用困惑及出路——基于法秩序统一原理
The Confusion and Way out of the Application of Counterfeit Patent Crime—Based on the Principle of Unity of Legal Order

DOI: 10.12677/isl.2025.92020, PP. 149-156

Keywords: 法秩序统一,假冒专利,冒充专利
Unity of Law and Order
, Counterfeit Patents, Spurious Patent

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

自假冒专利罪确立至今,该罪的适用率一直极低,被评价为象征性立法,而对专利侵权案件多认定为行政违法,“以罚代刑”的现象严重阻碍了国家对专利的管理秩序以及市场的公平竞争秩序,因此要对“以罚代刑”现象进行限制,不能无限度压缩刑法的适用空间,有效协调前置法和后置法管辖范围,坚持法秩序统一原理。另外也要对假冒专利罪存在的问题加以明确。首先要解决的是由于法条中对该罪所保护的法益规定较为简单,导致司法适用及学界对法益具体内容多有争议,应对法益具体内容进行明确。其次应当将该罪的客观方面在不同法律规定中统一化,改善当前各种规定冲突的现状。再次该罪的立案数额普遍高于其他同类型的罪名,不利于适用该罪进行及时有效的震慑以及预防再次犯罪,应结合其他罪名以及具体案件金额降低其入罪数额。最后,对专利权刑法保护的体系化构建提出设想,以期更严密地保护专利权。
Since the establishment of the crime of patent counterfeiting, the application rate of this crime has been extremely low, which is evaluated as symbolic legislation, and patent infringement cases are mostly identified as administrative violations. The phenomenon of “substituting punishment for punishment” seriously hinders the national management order of patents and the fair competition order of the market. Therefore, the phenomenon of “substituting punishment for punishment” should be restricted, and the application space of criminal law should not be indefinitely reduced. Effectively coordinate the jurisdiction of the pre-law and the post-law, and adhere to the principle of unity of legal order. In addition, it is necessary to clarify the problems existing in the crime of counterfeit patent. The first thing to be solved is that the legal interest protected by the crime in the law is relatively simple, which leads to many disputes on the specific content of legal interest in judicial application and academic circles, and the specific content of legal interest should be clarified. Secondly, the objective aspects of the crime should be unified in different legal provisions to improve the current situation of the conflict of various provisions. The amount of this crime is generally higher than other charges of the same type, which is not conducive to the application of this crime for timely and effective deterrence and prevention of recrime, and should be combined with the amount of other charges and specific cases to reduce the amount of its crime. Finally, this paper puts forward some ideas about the systematization of patent protection in criminal law, so as to protect the patent right more closely.

References

[1]  童德华, 任静. 专利刑法保护的理念创新与立法完善[J]. 电子知识产权, 2022(3): 52-64.
[2]  王志祥, 吴超莹. 论法秩序统一原理视野下假冒专利罪的成立范围[J]. 法学杂志, 2023, 44(4): 131-142.
[3]  周光权. 法秩序统一性原理的实践展开[J]. 法治社会, 2021(4): 1-12.
[4]  姜瀛. 论专利行政执法以罚代刑及其刑法应对[J]. 武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 18(4): 410-414.
[5]  [美]约翰·亨利·梅利曼. 大陆法系[M]. 顾培东, 禄正平, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2004: 20.
[6]  张新锋. 侵犯专利权罪之辩驳[J]. 电子知识产权, 2010(1): 50-54.
[7]  刘少谷. 刑法规制假冒专利行为的困境与对策[J]. 中州学刊, 2019(3): 55-59.
[8]  刘科. 侵犯专利权犯罪立法完善的理念、政策与措施[C]//北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院. 专利法研究(2015). 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2018: 13.
[9]  潘文博. 论责任与量刑的关系[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2016, 22(6): 106-119.
[10]  [意]贝卡利亚. 论犯罪与刑罚[M]. 黄风, 译. 北京: 中国大百科全书出版社, 1993: 70.
[11]  范思力. 完善假冒专利罪适用建言的反思[J]. 湖北工业职业技术学院学报, 2021, 34(2): 45-50.
[12]  张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2021: 46.
[13]  刘继琨. 探寻与限缩: 刑法目的解释之目的确认路径[J]. 青少年犯罪问题, 2024(6): 97-109.
[14]  胡云腾, 刘科. 知识产权刑事司法解释若干问题研究[J]. 中国法学, 2004(6): 135-147.
[15]  李宗辉. 论《刑法》专利犯罪制度之体系化重构[J]. 时代法学, 2017, 15(5): 14-20.
[16]  吴瑞. TRIPS视阈下中国专利权的刑法保护研究[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 27(6): 52-57.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133