全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

生成式人工智能产品责任承担研究
Research on the Responsibility Undertaking of Generative Artificial Intelligence Products

DOI: 10.12677/ds.2025.113116, PP. 212-219

Keywords: 生成式人工智能,产品责任,设计缺陷,损害赔偿
Generative Artificial Intelligence
, Product Liability, Design Defects, Compensation for Damages

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

相较于传统物质性产品,生成式人工智能的特殊性使其难以被现行的产品责任所涵盖,致使民事责任承担机制的失调。物质形态并非判断生成式人工智能产品属性的唯一标准,从目的论角度出发,在现有产品责任框架内探讨生成式人工智能的责任承担问题,是合理划分举证责任、弥补损害、规制生成式人工智能发展的可行路径。生成式人工智能在产品责任适用中应当准确认定“生产者”角色,对通识的网络服务提供者概念进行修正,并制定明确的质量标准,结合警示说明义务和风险补救义务综合评判。本文以产品责任为基点,推动科技发展与立法更新的协调发展。
Compared to traditional material products, the particularity of generative artificial intelligence makes it difficult to be covered by current product liability, resulting in an imbalance in the mechanism of civil liability. The material form is not the only criterion for judging the attributes of generative artificial intelligence products. From the perspective of teleology, exploring the issue of responsibility for generative artificial intelligence within the existing product liability framework is a feasible path to reasonably allocate the burden of proof, compensate for damages, and regulate the development of generative artificial intelligence. Generative artificial intelligence should accurately identify the role of “producer” in the application of product liability, revise the concept of general network service providers, and establish clear quality standards, combined with the obligation of warning instructions and risk remediation obligations for comprehensive evaluation. This article takes product liability as the basis, promotes the coordinated development of technology and legislative updates.

References

[1]  徐小奔. 论人工智能生成内容的著作权法平等保护[J]. 中国法学, 2024(1): 166-185.
[2]  李杨. 生成式人工智能风险的法律类型化治理[J]. 延安大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 46(1): 31-38+57.
[3]  赵精武. 论人工智能法的多维规制体系[J]. 法学论坛, 2024, 39(3): 53-66.
[4]  许庆永. 判例权威逻辑之证成[J]. 政法论坛, 2024, 42(5): 103-114.
[5]  郭少飞. 主体论视域下人工智能侵权责任承担构想[J]. 地方立法研究, 2023, 8(3): 64-80.
[6]  张高源. 试论生成式人工智能侵权的责任主体——以ChatGPT为例[J]. 产品可靠性报告, 2023(12): 120-122.
[7]  郑志峰. 人工智能产品责任的立法更新[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2024, 42(4): 3-17.
[8]  徐伟. 论生成式人工智能服务提供者的法律地位及其责任——以ChatGPT为例[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2023, 41(4): 69-80.
[9]  张凌寒. 深度合成治理的逻辑更新与体系迭代——ChatGPT等生成型人工智能治理的中国路径[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2023, 41(3): 38-51.
[10]  郑志峰. 自动驾驶汽车产品缺陷的认定困境与因应[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2022(12): 48-58+156-157.
[11]  钭晓东. 论生成式人工智能的数据安全风险及回应型治理[J]. 东方法学, 2023(5): 106-116.
[12]  杨立新. 人工智能产品责任的功能及规则调整[J]. 数字法治, 2023(4): 27-39.
[13]  胡元聪. 人工智能产品发展风险抗辩后的损害救济分摊机制研究[J]. 政法论丛, 2020(3): 121-130.
[14]  陈全思, 张浩, 栾群. 人工智能的侵权责任与归责机制[J]. 互联网经济, 2019(4): 28-31.
[15]  许庆永. 在线纠纷解决的正义表达[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2024, 27(2): 83-93.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133