全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

安检视觉搜索绩效影响因素的关联规则分析
Analysis of Association Rules on Factors Affecting the Performance of Visual Search in Security Screening

DOI: 10.12677/jsst.2025.131001, PP. 1-9

Keywords: 安检绩效,视觉搜索绩效,影响因素,关联规则
Security Performance
, Visual Search Performance, Influencing Factors, Association Rules

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为提高安检人员的视觉搜索绩效,降低漏检率,以16名机场安检人员和15名安检专业在校大学生为被试,基于Apriori算法,分析安检人员的经验水平、违禁品种类、遮盖程度、摆放角度、物品复杂程度以及物品凌乱程度等因素与安检绩效间的关联规则。结果表明:当安检人员缺乏经验、包内摆放的物品凌乱程度大且有其他物品遮盖违禁品时,他们最可能做出错误判断;在包内摆放的物品凌乱程度大、有其他物品遮盖违禁品的条件下,与错误判断构成的关联规则适用性最高;当包内摆放的物品凌乱程度小时,安检人员最可能做出正确判断;当安检人员有经验时,与正确判断构成的关联规则适用性最高。
In order to improve the visual search performance of security personnel and reduce the missed detection rate, 16 airport security personnel and 15 college students majoring in security inspection were selected as subjects. Based on Apriori algorithm, the association rules between the experience level of security personnel, the type of contraband, the degree of coverage, the angle of placement, the complexity of items and the degree of disorder of items and the performance of security inspection were analyzed. The results show that when security personnel are inexperienced, the items in the bag are messy and there are other items to cover the contraband, they are most likely to make wrong judgments; under the condition that the items placed in the package are messy and other items cover the contraband, the association rules formed with the wrong judgment have the highest applicability; when the items placed in the bag are in a low degree of disorder, the security personnel are most likely to make a correct judgment; when the security personnel have experience, the association rules formed with correct judgment have the highest applicability.

References

[1]  Dillingham, G.L. (2000) Aviation Security: Slow Progress in Addressing Long-Standing Screener Performance Problems: T-RCED-00-125. GAO Reports, United States. Government Accountability Office.
[2]  田益凡. 个体因素与危险品出现概率对X光安检绩效的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 清华大学, 2011.
[3]  刘畅, 邬歆, 于瑞峰. 语音噪声环境下的视觉搜索绩效研究[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2014, 19(5): 134-139.
[4]  于瑞峰, 程屿晨. 地铁安检作业环境调查与改善的实证研究[J]. 工业工程, 2013, 16(1): 14-18.
[5]  王燕青, 任金金, 余琴. X光机传输带速度对机场安检人员漏检率的影响分析[J]. 综合运输, 2017, 39(5): 55-59.
[6]  Ainsworth, L. (2003) Human Factors Considerations in Airport Security. Synergy Consultants Ltd.
[7]  郑艳芳, 江发明, 龚畅祺, 等. 基于E-prime的时间和颜色对安检视觉搜索绩效的影响研究[J]. 河南科技, 2021, 40(21): 11-14.
[8]  靳慧斌, 蔡亚敏, 洪远. 基于眼动数据分析的安检视觉搜索特征[J]. 工业工程, 2014, 17(2): 43-48.
[9]  舒晓苓, 吴雪琴, 廖斌. 时间压力视角下人格特征与VDT视觉搜索绩效的关系及形成机理[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2023, 19(4): 194-200.
[10]  张楠, 苏玉婷, 廖斌. 时间压力视角下人格特征与视觉搜索策略及绩效的关系[J]. 人类工效学, 2023, 29(3): 25-2936.
[11]  杨林栋, 于瑞峰. 人格特征和任务难度对视觉搜索绩效的影响[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(1): 91-96.
[12]  王燕青, 徐晶, 马越. 机场安检人员疲劳自评量表设计及检验[J]. 中国民航飞行学院学报, 2015, 27(3): 10-13.
[13]  李晓瑞. 情绪劳动策略对安检视觉搜索绩效的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 四川师范大学, 2024.
[14]  刘媛媛. 机场X光机操作员视觉搜索绩效研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2017.
[15]  王燕青, 任金金, 余琴. X光机传输带速度对机场安检人员漏检率的影响分析[J]. 综合运输, 2017, 39(5): 55-59.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133