全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

浙江中烟选择性采烤对中部上等烟产出率的影响
China Tobacco Zhejiang Industrial the Effect of Selective Harvesting on the Proportion Generated of Superior Leaves in the Middle of Flue-Cured Tobacco

DOI: 10.12677/hjas.2025.153033, PP. 271-278

Keywords: 烤烟,选择性采烤,中部上等烟
Flue-Cured Tobacco
, Selective Harvesting and Curing, Superior Leaves in Middle of Flue-Cured Tobacco

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为进一步提高贵州烟叶对“利群”品牌的适配率、增强贵州烟叶原料对“利群”品牌的贡献度,浙江中烟在贵州德江县开展了选择性采烤试验,结果表明,采用选择性采烤亩用工成本和烘烤成本均低于正常采烤烟叶,以打顶后留叶20片,打顶后不进行不适用鲜烟叶处理,选择性采烤第6~15叶位烟叶,其他叶位烟叶自然成熟后作为不适用鲜烟叶再打掉的处理生产成本最低。进行选择性采烤的处理烟叶亩产量有所下降,但能提高上等烟和中部上等烟的比例,以打顶后留叶20片,打顶后及时打掉下部1~5叶位烟叶,作为不适用鲜烟叶进行处理,选择第6~17叶位烟叶进行采烤,顶部3片叶不进行采烤的处理种植收益最高,产值为4109.28元/667.67 m2;其中部叶和上部叶化学成分则较为适宜,吸食质量劲头适中,烟气浓度中等~中等+,质量档次在中等+~较好–水平,整体表现略优于对照处理。
To further enhance the compatibility of Guizhou tobacco with the “Liqun” brand and improve its contribution to the brand’s raw material supply, China Tobacco Zhejiang Industrial Co., Ltd. conducted a selective harvesting and curing experiment in Dejiang County, Guizhou Province. The results indicate that selective harvesting and curing methods reduce both labor and curing costs compared to conventional harvesting and curing practices. Among the tested treatments, the most cost-effective approach involved retaining 20 leaves per plant after topping, omitting the removal of unsuitable fresh tobacco immediately after topping, selectively harvesting and curing leaves from the 6th to the 15th leaf position, and discarding the remaining leaves as unsuitable fresh tobacco upon natural maturation. Although selective harvesting and curing resulted in a lower yield per unit area, it increased the proportion of high- and medium-grade tobacco. The treatment that retained 20 leaves per plant after topping, promptly removed the lower 1~5 leaves as unsuitable fresh tobacco, selectively harvested and cured leaves from the 6th to the 17th position, and excluded the top three leaves from curing achieved the highest yield, with an output value of 4,109.28 yuan per 666.67 m2. Additionally, the chemical composition of selectively harvested middle and upper leaves was more favorable. Smoking quality and impact were classified as moderate, with smoke concentration ranging from medium to medium+, and quality grades varying from medium+ to better-. Overall, the selectively harvested tobacco exhibited slightly superior performance compared to the control treatment.

References

[1]  郑华, 彭宇, 郭亮, 等. 贵州省烤烟产业发展现状与存在问题及对策[J]. 农技服务, 2022, 39(4): 108-112.
[2]  王东飞, 吕大树, 徐玮, 等. 贵州主产烟区烤烟上部烟叶质量的差异[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2021, 49(12): 26-32.
[3]  何俊瑜, 陈博, 陈秀兰, 等. 贵州铜仁地区主要烟区植烟土壤养分状况[J]. 土壤, 2012, 44(6): 953-959.
[4]  李倩, 程玉渊, 张常兴, 等. 采烤方式对南阳烤烟上部叶品质和产值的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2022, 34(10): 14-18.
[5]  陈雨, 付艺婷, 余永旭, 等. “云烟87”上部烟叶采烤方式对烟叶产质量的影响[J]. 植物医学, 2022, 1(4): 38-43.
[6]  崔日男, 于大鹏, 张守荣, 等. 基地单元烟叶外观质量量化综合评价[J]. 广东蚕业, 2021, 55(4): 21-24.
[7]  刘晨, 韩玉环, 杨龙, 等. 不同套袋免打顶处理对烤烟上部叶生长发育的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2022, 54(7): 60-65.
[8]  马浩波, 苏新宏, 常剑波, 等. 上部六片烟叶分类采烤对烟叶品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(15): 163-165.
[9]  杨庆焱, 郑丽华, 汤友瑜, 等. 不同采烤工艺对烤烟上部叶烘烤质量的影响[J]. 南方农业, 2020, 14(18): 189-191.
[10]  梁柱, 姚未远, 张庆富, 等. 不同采烤次数对烟叶产量、质量及效益的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2021(9): 18-21.
[11]  段史江, 陈飞程, 韩助君, 等. 采收方式对烟叶品质和烤烟经济性状的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(24): 34-38.
[12]  罗延宏, 秦敏, 杨懿德, 等. 不同采烤方式对川南烤烟上部烟叶产质及效益的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2018, 24(6): 49-51.
[13]  曹景林, 程君奇, 李亚培, 等. 烤烟常规化学成分与吸食品质关系的研究进展[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(S1): 253-258.
[14]  刘文霖, 赵瑞娟, 邱雪柏, 等. 贵州烤烟烟叶的化学成分及抗氧化活性研究[J]. 化学工程与装备, 2023(11): 3-4.
[15]  张世强, 荀洋, 于大鹏, 等. 不同采收方式对烤烟上部叶化学成分和致香物质含量的影响[J]. 延边大学农学学报, 2019, 41(4): 36-42.
[16]  靖浩. 不同时期打顶对中、上部烟叶的氮代谢和品质的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2023.
[17]  张婷, 李金海, 廖晓玲, 等. 湖北烤烟主栽品种上部叶评吸质量与化学成分的关系[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(19): 142-147.
[18]  张明发, 张胜, 袁小康, 等. 湘西山地区域不同移栽期气象因子对烤烟“HN2146”农艺性状的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2023, 13(10): 70-76.
[19]  藏照阳, 张艳玲, 王建伟, 等. 贵州省烤烟种植主要气象风险因素的时空分布特征分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2021, 54(12): 17-27.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133