全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Specialist Nurses’ Experiences of Working with Parental Support in Each and Every Encounter, According to an Evidence-Based Model in Child Healthcare

DOI: 10.4236/ojn.2025.153015, PP. 198-210

Keywords: Child Healthcare, Specialist Nurses’ Experiences, Qualitative Content Analysis, Evaluation of Solihull Approach Training, Consultation, Containment, Reciprocity, Empathetic Behaviour Management

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Aim: To explore specialist nurses’ experiences of working with the evidence-based Solihull Approach in Child Healthcare. Background: In recent decades, changes in living conditions and lifestyles have affected child healthcare, shifting the focus towards children’s mental health. Today’s parents increasingly seek knowledge and information about their children’s emotional needs and development. Research in Child Healthcare indicates a growing need for support in parenting and strengthening the parent-child relationship. Design and Method: The interview study used a qualitative approach, and a qualitative method was employed for content analysis. The request for participation was sent to a strategic sample of specialist nurses who had participated in the SA training program; the majority (n = 14) were interviewed. The COREQ checklist was used in this study. Results: The analysis reveals an overarching theme, four categories, and 13 subcategories that illustrate how the training affected the nurses’ attitudes, values, and working methods. They have gained increased awareness of the relationship between parents and children, focusing on facilitating dialogue and individualized care. Conclusion: The study shows that the Solihull Approach significantly enhances specialist nurses’ competencies in Child Healthcare, resulting in a more person-centred and relationship-oriented approach with parents and children. Relevance to Clinical Practice: The study revealed that specialist nurses focused more on the impact and quality of interactions between parents and children. Their ability to observe these interactions enabled them to work with parental support. Patient or Public Contribution: This educational effort enhances how nurses collaborate with parental support, emphasizing the child’s perspective during each visit to Child Healthcare centres.

References

[1]  Tell, J., Magnusson, M. and Lindfors, A. (2011) Stora skillnader i svensk barnhälsovård: Barnhälsovårdsenheterna avgör själva oroande att nationellt program saknas [Major Differences in Swedish Child Healthcare: The Child Healthcare Units Themselves Decide Worryingly that a National Program is Missing]. Läkartidningen, 108, 1618-1621.
[2]  Pettit, A. (2008) Health Visitors’ Experiences of Using a Tool in Assessing Infant Attachment. Community Practitioner, 81, 23-26.
[3]  McAtamney, R. (2011) Health Visitors’ Perceptions of Their Role in Assessing Parent-Infant Relationships. The Journal of the Health Visitors Association, 81, 33-37.
[4]  Broberg, A., Granqvist, P., Ivarsson, T. and Risholm Mothander, P. (2006) Anknytningsteori: Betydelsen av nära känslomässiga relationer [Attachment Theory: The Importance of Close Emotional Relationships]. Natur & Kultur.
[5]  Broberg, A., Risholm Mothander, P., Granqvist, P. and Ivarsson, T. (2008) Anknytning i praktiken: Tillämpningar av anknytningsteorin [Attachment in Practice: Applications of Attachment Theory]. Natur & Kultur.
[6]  Douglas, H. and Ginty, M. (2001) The Solihull Approach: Changes in Health Visiting Practice. Community Practitioner, 74, 222-224.
[7]  Douglas, H. (2017) Solihull Approach Antenatal Resource Pack: The Journey to Parenthood. Jill Rogers Associates.
[8]  Bowlby, J. (1988) A Secure Base. Routledge.
[9]  Lowenhoff, C. (2004) Practice Development: Training Professionals in Primary Care to Manage Emotional and Behavioural Problems in Children. Work Based Learning in Primary Care, 2.
[10]  Whitehead, R. and Douglas, H. (2005) A Qualitative Evaluation of Health Visitors’ Experiences of Using the Solihull Approach. Community Practitioner, 78, 20-23.
[11]  Milford, R., Kleve, L., Lea, J. and Greenwood, R. (2006) A Pilot Evaluation Study of the Solihull Approach. Community Practitioner, 79, 358-362.
[12]  Moore, T., Adams, M. and Patt, R. (2013) A Service Evaluation of the Solihull Approach Training and Practice. Social Science Premium Collection. Community Practitioner, 86, 26-29.
[13]  Vasilopoulou, E., Afzal, A., Murphy, K. and Thompson, C. (2017) The Solihull Approach: Pros and Cons. Community Practitioner, 90, 40-42.
[14]  Berger, E. and Bryggman, M. (2020) Solihullmodellen—Ett arbetssätt för barnhälsovården. [The Solihull Approach—A Working Model for Child Healthcare]. 2nd Edition, Regiontryckeriet.
[15]  Olsson-Tall, M., Berger, E., Bryggman, M. and Bäck-Pettersson, S. (2020) Solihullmodellen utvecklar barnhälsovårdsarbetet—Utvärdering av en utbildningssatsning [The Solihull Model Develops Child Healthcare Work—Evaluation of an Educational Investment]. 1st Edition, Regiontryckeriet.
[16]  Lumsden, V. and Sarankin, M. (2014) The Process of Consultation to a Health Visiting Team Based on the Solihull Approach: A Critical Reflection. Community Practitioner, 87, 34-36.
[17]  Graneheim, U.H. and Lundman, B. (2004) Qualitative Content Analysis in Nursing Research: Concepts, Procedures, and Measures to Achieve Trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105-112.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
[18]  Graneheim, U., Lindgren, B.-M. and Lundman, B. (2017) Methodological Challenges in Qualitative Content Analysis: A Discussion Paper. Nurse Education Today, 56, 29-34.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002
[19]  Tong, A., Sainsbury, P. and Craig, J. (2007) Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): A 32-Item Checklist for Interviews and Focus Groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19, 349-357.
https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
[20]  Kvale, S. and Brinkman, S. (2009) Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[21]  World Medical Association (2013) The Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.
https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki/
[22]  Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. (1986) But Is It Rigorous? Trustworthiness and Authenticity in Naturalistic Evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986, 73-84.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427
[23]  Krippendorff, K. (2013) Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[24]  Winnicott, D.W. (1990) Home Is Where We Start from: Essays by a Psychoanalyst. Norton.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133