全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
Health  2025 

Effects of Candies on Salivary Secretion and Oral Bacterial Counts

DOI: 10.4236/health.2025.173013, PP. 183-191

Keywords: Candy, Taste Stimulation, Salivary Secretion Rate, Oral Bacteria Count, Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Purpose: Gum chewing is encouraged to alleviate symptoms of xerostomia, but few studies have been conducted with candy. We aimed to clarify the effects of sucking candies on salivary secretion and oral bacterial counts to improve the oral environment of patients with xerostomia. Methods: The participants’ unstimulated salivary flow rate, pH, and oral bacterial counts were measured. A candy (candy stimulus 1) was then placed in the mouth, and the time for complete dissolution, the total amount of saliva secreted, and the number of oral bacteria after dissolution were measured. A second candy (candy stimulus 2) was then placed in the mouth, and the same measurements were performed. Xylicrystal Milk Mint Candies (non-sugar, Kasugai Confectionery Co., LTD) were used. Fifteen healthy adult participants were asked not to brush their teeth before bedtime on the day before the experiment. Results: The mean unstimulated salivary flow rate was (0.39 ± 0.29) mL/min, and the mean salivary pH was 6.96 ± 0.21. Dissolution times for candy stimuli 1 and 2 were (358 ± 62) s and (359 ± 57) s, respectively. A negative correlation (p < 0.05) was found between the unstimulated salivary flow rate and dissolution time for both candy stimuli. The mean candy-stimulated saliva volume and flow rates were (18.05 ± 6.75) mL and (3.07 ± 1.07) mL/min for candy stimulus 1, and (17.84 ± 6.14) mL and (3.06 ± 1.12) mL/min for candy stimulus 2. A positive correlation (p < 0.05) was found between unstimulated and candy-stimulated salivary flow rates. Sucking the candy significantly reduced the number of bacteria (p < 0.05), with candy stimulus 1 reducing bacteria to approximately 65% of the pre-sucking level and candy stimulus 2 to approximately 49%. Conclusion: Sucking candy increased the unstimulated salivary flow rate by approximately 7.8 times and significantly reduced the number of bacteria on the dorsum of the tongue.

References

[1]  Watanabe, S. and Dawes, C. (1988) A Comparison of the Effects of Tasting and Chewing Foods on the Flow Rate of Whole Saliva in Man. Archives of Oral Biology, 33, 761-764.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(88)90010-6
[2]  Dawes, C. and Macpherson, L.M.D. (1992) Effects of Nine Different Chewing-Gums and Lozenges on Salivary Flow Rate and Ph. Caries Research, 26, 176-182.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000261439
[3]  Jenkins, G.N. and Edgar, W.M. (1989) The Effect of Daily Gum-Chewing on Salivary Flow Rates in Man. Journal of Dental Research, 68, 786-790.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680050601
[4]  Dawes, C. (1987) Physiological Factors Affecting Salivary Flow Rate, Oral Sugar Clearance, and the Sensation of Dry Mouth in Man. Journal of Dental Research, 66, 648-653.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660s107
[5]  Hamada, R., Suehiro, J., Nakano, M., Kikutani, T. and Konishi, K. (2011) Development of Rapid Oral Bacteria Detection Apparatus Based on Dielectrophoretic Impedance Measurement Method. IET Nanobiotechnology, 5, 25-31.
https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-nbt.2010.0011
[6]  Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (2019) Vital Statistics Monthly Report Annual Total (Approximate Number).
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/jinkou/geppo/nengai19/dl/gaikyouR1.pdf
[7]  Ebihara, S. (2014) Saliva and Aspiration Pneumonia. The Japanese Journal of Taste and Smell Research, 21, 61-67.
[8]  Kobayashi, K., Ryu, M., Izumi, S., Ueda, T. and Sakurai, K. (2017) Effect of Oral Cleaning Using Mouthwash and a Mouth Moisturizing Gel on Bacterial Number and Moisture Level of the Tongue Surface of Older Adults Requiring Nursing Care. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 17, 116-121.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12684
[9]  Becks, H. and Wainwright, W.W. (1943) Rate of Flow of Resting Saliva in Healthy Individuals. Journal of Dental Research, 22, 391-396.
[10]  Dawes, C. (1983) A Mathematical Model of Salivary Clearance of Sugar from the Oral Cavity. Caries Research, 17, 321-334.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000260684
[11]  Lagerlof, F. and Dawes, C. (1984) The Volume of Saliva in the Mouth before and after Swallowing. Journal of Dental Research, 63, 618-621.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630050201
[12]  Dawes, C. and Watanabe, S. (1987) The Effect of Taste Adaptation on Salivary Flow Rate and Salivary Sugar Clearance. Journal of Dental Research, 66, 740-744.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660030701
[13]  Ohmori, M., Miyazaki, A., Sato, H., Katano, S., Tanabe, S., Masatsuki, N., et al. (2005) A Study on the Effects of Tongue Cleaning. Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi (Journal of the Japanese Society of Periodontology), 47, 36-43.
https://doi.org/10.2329/perio.47.36
[14]  Oguchi, K., Oshita, N. Kishimoto, T., Kanada, Y., Fujitani, M. and Senda, A. (2013) Clinical Efficacy of Newly-Developed Device for Measuring the Bacterial Counts of Dental Plaque: Evaluation of Oral Hygiene Status. The Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 56, 588-599.
[15]  Watanabe, S. and Dawes, C. (1988) The Effects of Different Foods and Concentrations of Citric Acid on the Flow Rate of Whole Saliva in Man. Archives of Oral Biology, 33, 1-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(88)90089-1
[16]  Navazesh, M. (2012) Xerostomia and Salivary Gland Hypofunction; Aetiology, Diagnosis, Clinical Implications and Management. In: Edger, M., Dawes, C. and O’Mullane, D., Eds., Saliva and Oral Health (4th Edition), Thanet Press Ltd., 57-79.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133