Istat “Over the course of their lives, almost 6 million people aged 18 and over have been involved in a case at civil judicial offices: 13% of men and 11% of women. These are mainly family cases, mainly for separations and divorces, and work cases. 54% of people aged 18 and over, who are a party to a civil case, or have been in the past, are very or fairly satisfied with the judicial system. Satisfaction prevails among women and people with lower educational qualifications. Only 28% of citizens involved in a civil case know the economic costs of the process at the time the case is initiated. Increases knowledge of extrajudicial dispute resolution tools and the use of them”. The relationship between Italians and civil justice has not always been one of the easiest. Mediation, at least formally, has always been rooted in the Italian legal system, except for the period 1922/1945. In 2010, compulsory civil mediation was introduced, i.e., a condition for civil proceeding. Disputes, criticism, bewilderment. However, although at a slow pace, it has grown and most recently the Legislative Decree no. 216 of 27.12.2024, called “Correttivo” came in force. It brings interesting changes to Legislative Decree 10.10.2022, no. 149 (Cartabia Reform), which made changes to one of the basic acts of the Italian legislation on mediation, Legislative Decree 28/2010. Only one concern: the likely lawyerisation of mediation. In the article, Mandatory mediation, the Italian experience, 2015, the last words were: “Since 2010 Italy has become a very interesting laboratory to analyze the consequences of different types of ADRs. And I think we are just at the very beginning”. Ten years later, with an 18% increase of agreements and more attention to training, not yet sufficient, it should be repeated: “We are just at the very beginning!”
References
[1]
Battista, M. T., & Matteucci, G. (2024). Usucapione e mediazione, normativa e particolarità operative. Vita Notarile. https://www.academia.edu/120186001/Usucapione_e_mediazione_normativa_e_particolarita_operative_15_02_2024
[2]
Battista, P. L. (2019). Il Paese dove tuttofinisce in Tribunale. Corriere della Sera. https://www.corriere.it/cronache/17_marzo_29/paese-dove-tutto-finisce-tribunale-935c7212-14c5-11e7-a7c3-077037ca4143.shtml
[3]
Biolchini, M. C. (2013). Resoconto del convegno: Il ruolo del giudicenellamediazione. MondoADR. https://www.mondoadr.it/resoconto-del-convegno-il-ruolo-del-giudice-nella-mediazione/
[4]
Breggia, L. (2015). Il Progetto Nausicaadel Tribunale di Firenze: Esperienza virtuosa di invio in mediazione. Questione Giustiza. https://www.questionegiustizia.it/rivista/articolo/il-progetto-nausicaa-del-tribunale-di-firenze_esperienza-virtuosa-di-invio-in-mediazione_220
[5]
Bruni, A. (2019). Mediation in Italy. Concilia. https://concilia.it/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/book_aia-1.pdf
[6]
Buffone, G. (2014). La mediazionedemandata o disposta dal giudice come sistemaomeostatico del processo civile: il progettodell’OsservatoriosullaGiustizia Civile di Milano. Il Caso. http://www.ilcaso.it/articoli/404.pdf
[7]
Calamandrei, P. (1921). TroppiAvvocati. La Voce.
[8]
Collini, E., Nesi, P., Raffaelli, C., & Scandiffio, F. (2024). Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Agile Mediation Propensity Assessment. IEEE Access, 12, 37782-37798. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10464317
[9]
Cominelli, L., & Jacqmin, A. (2020). Civil and Commercial Mediation in Italy: Lights and Shadows. Revista da EMERJ, 22, 11. https://www.emerj.tjrj.jus.br/revistaemerj_online/edicoes/revista_v22_n1/revista_v22_n1_11.pdf
[10]
D’Urso, G. C., & Schonewille, M. (2020). 6th Key-Government: Make Mediation a Prerequisite to Civil Litigation. https://www.mediate.com/articles/gavrila-key6-civil.cfm
[11]
D’Urso, L., & Canessa, R. (2017). The Italian Mediation Law on Civil and Commercial Disputes. Mondoadr. https://mediatorsbeyondborders.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/The-Italian-Mediation-Law.pdf
[12]
De Palo, G. (2014). Voluntary Mediation? Apparently, the False Prince Charming. http://www.mediate.com/articles/PaloResponse.cfm
[13]
De Palo, G. (2020). Mediating Mediation: the Easy Opt-Out Model. Heinonline. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/heraldl2020&div=20&id=&page=
[14]
De Tilla, M. (2012). OUA (OrganismoUnitariodell’Avvocatura, di rappresentanzapoliticadegliavvocati) president (2012) “L’obbligatorietà e icosti alti”. Quotidiano Sanità. https://www.quotidianosanita.it/cronache/articolo.php?approfondimento_id=2797
[15]
Delia, M. (2012). La conciliazione: Proposte programmatiche dal Tribunale di Bari, Sezione distaccata di Modugno. Foro Italiano, 15, 60.
[16]
Giolitti, G. (1899). Propaganda, giornalesocialista, Napoli, 5.11.1899, discorso 29.10.1899 aglielettori di Busca. https://www.mirkoriazzoli.it/discorso-di-dronero-di-giolitti/
[17]
Giudice, N. (2013). Decreto fare e mediazione: qualchecommento dopo la pubblicazione. Blogmediazione. https://blogmediazione.com/2013/06/23/decreto-fare-e-mediazione-qualche-commento-dopo-la-pubblicazione/
[18]
Godin, P. (2011). Italian Lawyers Strike Because of Mandatory Mediation.
[19]
Lucarelli, P. (2019). La sentenzadella Corte di Cassazione 8473/2019: Un raroesempio di uroboro. Judicium. https://www.judicium.it/la-sentenza-della-corte-cassazione-84732019-un-raro-esempio-urobo-ro/?fbclid=IwAR0a2BioN8TTfIqvULm-1nC3BrxZMkYUkhWpSsEJxx8vzFIx2plcqAYbg-8
[20]
Marinaro, M. (2019). Mediazione: scontrosullapartecipazionepersonaledelle parti. https://ntplusdiritto.ilsole24ore.com/art/mediazione-scontro-partecipazione-personale-parti-ACQFbOV
[21]
Matteucci, G. (2010). La mediaconciliazione: Una mimesi di legislazionialtrui o un recuperodellenostretradizioni? Temi Romana (quadrimestrale dell’Ordine degli avvocati di Roma).
[22]
Matteucci, G. (2012). Mediazione avanti tutta, ma …la formazione? Altalex. https://www.altalex.com/documents/news/2012/09/26/mediazione-avanti-tutta-ma-la-formazione
[23]
Matteucci, G. (2013). Avvocatimediatoriopelegis con il Decreto del Fare. Altalex. https://www.altalex.com/documents/news/2013/07/04/avvocati-mediatori-ope-legis-con-il-decreto-del-fare
[24]
Matteucci, G. (2014). Conciliazione endoprocessuale e mediazionedelegata: Per la magistraturaitaliana“figlie di un Diominore”. MondoADR. https://www.mondoadr.it/conciliazione-endoprocessuale-mediazione-delegata-la-magistratura-italiana-figlie-di-dio-minore/
[25]
Matteucci, G. (2015). Mandatory Mediation, the Italian Experience. Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual.
[26]
Matteucci, G. (2017). Commissione Alpa e mediazione: “festina lente” o “adelante con juicio”? BlogMediazione. https://blogmediazione.com/2017/02/07/commissione-alpa-e-mediazione-festina-lente-o-adelante-con-juicio/
[27]
Matteucci, G. (2019). Mediation and Judiciary in Italy 2019. Asia Pacific Mediation Journal, 2, 62. http://mediate.or.kr/base/data/APMJ.php https://www.academia.edu/40638556/Mediation_and_judiciary_in_Italy_2019
[28]
Matteucci, G. (2021). Commissione Luiso: nuoveprospettive per le ADR in Italia? ADRItalia.
[29]
Matteucci, G. (2024a). Mediazione civile e commerciale in Italia dopo la RiformaCartabia. Da Zaleuco di LocriEpizefiri (VIII sec. A.C.) all’intelligenzaartificiale. Aracne Editrice. https://www.aracneeditrice.eu/it/pubblicazioni/mediazione-civile-e-commerciale-in-italia-dopo-la-riforma-cartabia-giovanni-matteucci-9791221814514.html https://www.aracneeditrice.eu/anteprime/9791221814514.pdf
[30]
Matteucci, G. (2024b). Mediazione e intelligenzaartificiale in Italia(2024). Altalex. https://www.altalex.com/documents/news/2024/09/18/mediazione-intelligenza-artificiale-italia-2024
[31]
Matteucci, G. (2024c). Civil Process and Mediation in Italy, 2024. Ius dicere et litem componere, Italiae usus. Beijing Law Review, 15, 1347-1366.
[32]
Matteucci, G. (2024d). Mediazione e giudici in Italia. Revista de Direito. https://portaltj.tjrj.jus.br/documents/d/portal-conhecimento/008-revistadireito2024-03-giovannimatteucci
[33]
Monteleone, G. (2023). La mediazioneobbligatoria: conciliazione o giurisdizionesurrogata? Breviriflessionicritiche: Ripristinando in ogniComunedelloStatogliuffici di conciliazione da affidare a magistrationorari. Judicium. https://www.judicium.it/la-mediazione-obbligatoria-conciliazione-o-giurisdizione-surrogata-brevi-riflessioni-critiche/
[34]
Moriconi, M. (2011). La mediazione, profilioperativi e problematiche operative. http://www.adrmaremma.it/moriconi01.pdf
[35]
Nolan-Haley, J. M. (2010). Mediation: The “New Arbitration”. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, Forthcoming, Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1713928. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1713928
[36]
Prezzolini, G. (1921). Codicedella Vita Italiana, §18. http://tuttosbagliatotuttodarifare.blogspot.it/2011/10/codice-della-vita-italiana-giuseppe.html
[37]
Rajkowski, P. (2020). The Death of Traditional Mediation—An Obituary. https://mediate.com/the-death-of-traditional-mediation-an-obituary/
[38]
Salisbury, M. (2020). The Lawyerization of the Mediation Process. https://www.mediate.com/the-lawyerization-of-the-mediation-process/
[39]
Scamuzzi, L. (1886). Digesto Italiano, 1886 (p. 39). Voce Conciliatore.
[40]
Stoppa, M. A. (2022). La rivoluzionedellamediazionetelematica in Italia. Altalex. https://www.altalex.com/documents/news/2022/12/10/rivoluzione-mediazione-telematica-in-italia
[41]
Stoppa, M. A. (2023). La nuovamediazionetelematica: firmaelettronicadeiverbali e prospettive future con l’intervento del notaio. Altalex. https://www.altalex.com/documents/news/2023/03/06/nuova-mediazione-telematica-firma-elettronica-verbali-intervento-notaio
[42]
Swanson, D. (2016). A History of Mediation in Italy: Both Ancient (Including Bankruptcy) and Recent. https://mediatbankry.com/2021/09/14/a-history-of-mediation-in-italy-both-ancient-including-bankruptcy-and-recent/
[43]
Tvaronaviciene, A., Korsakoviene, I., & Radanova, J. (2023). If Mediation Is Still a Paradox, Should We Bother Solving It? https://mediate.com/if-mediation-is-still-a-paradox-should-we-bother-solving-it/
[44]
Weiler, R. (2018). Whiter (Wither) Mediation? Kluwer Mediation Blog. http://mediationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/04/06/whither-wither-mediation/