全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

行政协议反向诉讼之容许性探析
An Analysis of the Permissibility of Reverse Litigation in Administrative Agreements

DOI: 10.12677/ds.2025.113106, PP. 146-150

Keywords: 行政协议,反向诉讼,证据规则与举证责任分配
Administrative Agreement
, Reverse Litigation, Evidence Rules and Allocation of Burden of Proof

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

行政协议反向诉讼之容许性探析,通过剖析行政协议反向诉讼的理论基础,揭示其内涵与特征,明确其在行政法律关系中的定位。同时,详细分析构建行政协议反向诉讼面临的现实困境,包括行政协议识别难题、传统诉讼理念束缚以及非诉执行机制制约等。进而提出突破困境的路径,如明确行政协议认定标准、转变诉讼理念、优化非诉执行机制等。在此基础上,进一步阐述行政协议反向诉讼的制度构建与程序设计,包括诉讼主体资格确定、诉讼程序运行、证据规则与举证责任分配等方面。最后,探讨保障行政协议反向诉讼制度有效实施的措施,强调加强司法能力建设、强化监督制约机制以及推动行政机关依法行政的重要性。通过全面系统的研究,为行政协议反向诉讼制度的构建与完善提供理论支持与实践参考。
An Analysis of the Permissibility of Reverse Litigation on Administrative Agreements: By dissecting the theoretical foundation of reverse litigation on administrative agreements, this paper reveals its connotation and characteristics, and clarifies its position within administrative legal relations. Meanwhile, it conducts a detailed analysis of the practical dilemmas faced in constructing reverse litigation in administrative agreements, including the difficulties in identifying administrative agreements, the constraints of traditional litigation concepts, and the restrictions of the non-litigation enforcement mechanism. Furthermore, it proposes ways to break through these dilemmas, such as clarifying the identification criteria for administrative agreements, changing litigation concepts, and optimizing the non-litigation enforcement mechanism. Based on this, the paper further elaborates on the institutional construction and procedural design of reverse litigation in administrative agreements, covering aspects such as the determination of litigation subject qualifications, the operation of the litigation process, evidence rules, and the allocation of burden of proof. Finally, it discusses the measures to ensure the effective implementation of the reverse litigation system for administrative agreements, emphasizing the importance of strengthening judicial capacity building, enhancing the supervision and restraint mechanism, and promoting the law-based administration of administrative agencies. Through comprehensive and systematic research, provide theoretical support and practical references for the construction and improvement of the reverse litigation system of administrative agreements.

References

[1]  杨慧珍. 行政协议相对人违约纠纷司法解决的困境与出路[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 烟台: 烟台大学, 2023.
[2]  李文才. 论中国古代中央集权体制的形成、延续及其当代启示[J]. 山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 46(1): 108-117.
[3]  张凌霄. 军机处的满伴与清代中枢机构之变迁[J]. 清史研究, 2021, 126(4): 68-81.
[4]  董津. 《1857-1858年经济学手稿》中人的自由以及全面发展思想研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2020.
[5]  解志勇, 闫映全. 反向行政诉讼: 全域性控权与实质性解决争议的新思路[J]. 比较法研究, 2018(3): 155-169.
[6]  黄鹏, 孙韡. 行政协议反向诉讼制度构建的必要性与可行性研究[J]. 镇江高专学报, 2024, 37(3): 69-72.
[7]  杨云飞. 黑格尔的社会契约论批判及其当代意义[J]. 伦理学研究, 2023(6): 67-79.
[8]  孙琳琳. 行政协议反向诉讼之容许性探析[J]. 重庆科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2024(5): 31-41.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133