全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

三江顶托下乐山城区设计水面线计算探讨
Discussion on Design Water Surface Profile Calculation under Backwater Influence of the Three Rivers in Leshan City

DOI: 10.12677/jwrr.2025.141010, PP. 88-97

Keywords: 设计洪水,水面线,回水顶托,同频率地区组成法,典型年法,乐山市
Design Flood
, Water Surface Profile, Backwater Influence, Equivalent Frequency Regional Composition Method, Typical Year Method, Leshan City

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

同频率地区组成法和典型年法广泛地应用于干支流交汇地区设计洪水计算中,但两种方法均有各自的局限性,目前对于两种方法的适用性比较研究还很少。本文以乐山市中心城区设计水面线计算为例,探讨了同频率地区组成法和典型年法在三江相互顶托下的适用性。结果表明,相对于同频率组成法,典型年法以实际发生的洪水组成作为样本进行洪水分配,方法简单易行,多个典型年能更加全面反映区域的洪水组成特点,在乐山区域更加适用。但典型年的代表性需要结合地区暴雨洪水特点以及地区实际合理确定。
The equivalent frequency regional composition (EFRC) method and the typical year method are widely used in the design flood calculation in the area of confluence of main streams and tributaries. However, there are few comparative studies on the limitations and applicability of these two methods. Taking the calculation of the design water surface profile in the central area of Leshan City as an example. The application of the EFRC method and the typical year method under the backwater influence of three rivers is discussed in this paper. The results demonstrate that the typical year method utilizes the actual flood composition as a sample for flood allocation, which is more straightforward and readily implementable in comparison with the EFRC method. In addition, multiple typical years can more comprehensively reflect the regional flood composition, which is more applicable in Leshan City. However, the representativeness of the typical year needs to be appropriately determined by the characteristics of the regional storm floods, as well as the actual situation in the region.

References

[1]  李冬宁, 李建坤. 干支流汇合口处支流设计洪水水面线组合计算方法[J]. 湖南水利水电, 2021(6): 10-11, 25.
[2]  王云帆, 白桦, 桂发亮, 等. 信江白塔河柏泉站河段干流对支流顶托响应分析[J]. 南昌工程学院学报, 2024, 43(1): 8-15.
[3]  郭生练, 刘章君, 熊立华. 设计洪水计算方法研究进展与评价[J]. 水利学报, 2016, 47(3): 302-314.
[4]  李天元, 郭生练, 李妍清, 等. 梯级水库设计洪水方法及研究进展[J]. 水资源研究, 2012, 1(2): 14-20.
[5]  XIONG, F., GUO, S., YIN, J., et al. Comparative study of flood regional composition methods for design flood estimation in cascade reservoir system. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 590(6): 125530.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125530
[6]  陈炯宏, 郭生练, 刘攀, 等. 基于可靠度理论的设计洪水计算方法研究[J]. 人民长江, 2008, 39(18): 1-3.
[7]  HUANG, L., LI, S. and SI, Z. Research on designing for flood risk based on advanced checking-point (JC) method. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal, 2014, 13(8): 2119-2124.
https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2014.234
[8]  ZHONG, S., HE, Y., GUO, S., et al. Design flood estimation of cascade reservoirs based on vine-copula flood regional composition. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2024, 56: 102071.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.102071
[9]  李天元, 郭生练, 刘章君, 等. 梯级水库下游设计洪水计算方法研究[J]. 水利学报, 2014(6): 641-648.
[10]  刘章君, 郭生练, 李天元, 等. 设计洪水地区组成的区间估计方法研究[J]. 水利学报, 2015(5): 543-550.
[11]  HUANG, Y., LIANG, Z., HU, Y., et al. Theoretical derivation for the exceedance probability of corresponding flood volume of the equivalent frequency regional composition method in hydrology. Hydrology Research, 2020, 51(6): 1274-1292.
https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2020.027
[12]  夏建荣, 李廷华. 糯扎渡水电站设计洪水地区组成研究[J]. 水力发电, 2005, 31(5): 17-19.
[13]  黄一昕, 梁忠民, 胡义明, 等. 关于水文同频率地区组成法中相应洪量频率的探讨[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2018, 16(3): 189-193.
[14]  谢蕾. 同频率地区组成法在区间洪水计算中的应用[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2010, 33(5): 442-447.
[15]  陈甜, 董增川, 贾本有, 等. 考虑上游梯级水库群调度的小南海水电站坝址设计洪水分析[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 42(6): 476-480.
[16]  谢雨祚, 熊丰, 郭生练, 等. 金沙江下游梯级与三峡水库防洪库容互补等效关系研究[J]. 水利学报, 2023, 54(2): 139-147.
[17]  李立平, 高玉磊, 李妍清. 嘉陵江流域整体设计洪水研究[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(2): 72-77.
[18]  陈华, 栗飞, 王金星, 等. 湘江流域设计洪水地区组成方法研究[J]. 水文, 2014, 34(2): 55-59.
[19]  温得平, 赵兴明, 伍云华, 等. 大通河干流设计洪水分析[J]. 宁夏大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 41(4): 424-428.
[20]  高诚, 车敏娜. 万泉河流域设计洪水分析[J]. 海河水利, 2024(5): 57-60, 70.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133