全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

人教A版与IBDP版数学教材比较研究——以概率统计为例
A Comparative Study of Mathematics Textbooks between Humanistic A Version and IBDP Version—Taking Probability Statistics as an Example

DOI: 10.12677/ces.2025.133157, PP. 73-81

Keywords: 高中数学,概率统计,教材比较
High School Math
, Probability Statistics, Textbook Comparison

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

随着全球化教育交流的深入,对比不同教育体系下的教材对优化教学内容具有重要意义。通过对人教A版与IBDP版高中数学教材中概率统计部分的比较,探讨两种不同教育理念下该学科内容的组织编排、呈现方式、版面设计、例习题数量及其综合难度的异同,并提出了改进教学方式、重视学生核心素养发展、增强知识点与现实联系以及强化课堂与信息技术整合的重要性。不仅揭示了两套教材各自的特色与优势,还为国内与国际课程的融合提供了有益的参考,希望对高中数学课堂教学以及教材改革有所帮助。
With the deepening of globalized educational exchanges, comparing textbooks under different educational systems is of great significance in optimizing the teaching content. By comparing the probability statistics section in the high school mathematics textbooks of Humanistic A and IBDP editions, this study explores the similarities and differences in the organization, presentation, layout design, number of examples and exercises, and overall difficulty of the subject content under two different educational philosophies. It also highlights the importance of improving teaching methods, emphasizing the development of students’ core competencies, enhancing the connection between knowledge points and real-life situations, and strengthening the integration of classroom teaching with information technology. It not only reveals the characteristics and advantages of the two sets of textbooks, but also provides useful references for the integration of domestic and international curricula, hoping to be helpful for high school mathematics classroom teaching as well as textbook reform.

References

[1]  张妍. 中美高中数学教材概率与统计部分比较研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2022.
[2]  朱台. 沪教版与IBDP版数学教材的比较研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2023.
[3]  谢先成. 基于核心素养的《普通高中数学课程标准(2017年版)》解读——访数学课程标准修订组组长、东北师范大学原校长史宁中教授[J]. 教师教育论坛, 2018, 31(6): 4-7.
[4]  徐慧新, 项亚光. IBDP数学课程与普通高中数学课程的比较与启示[J]. 外国中小学教育, 2015(7): 53-59.
[5]  鲍建生. 中英两国初中数学期望课程综合难度的比较[J]. 全球教育展望, 2002, 31(9): 48-52.
[6]  张翼飞. 澳大利亚IB数学教材与我国高中人教版教材的比较研究——以概率统计为例[J]. 数学教学, 2019(12): 4-8.
[7]  张萍, 曾素樵. IBDP与我国高中数学课程比较研究——指向拔尖创新人才培养[J]. 教育研究与评论(中学教育教学), 2022(4): 38-43.
[8]  Lu, D. and Yang, Z. (2023) Research on the Influencing Factors of Junior High School Students’ Mathematical Operation Ability in China. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 49, 546-556.
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v49i41232

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133