|
Modern Linguistics 2025
从形体演变看构件“礻”“衤”的讹混
|
Abstract:
示字旁和衣字旁在做左边偏旁的时候时常讹混,因为它们的形体“礻”“衤”非常接近。从“示”字“衣”字及它们作为构件时的形体进行分析,发现汉代以后隶变和楷书的出现和成熟使两个构件发生变形简化,这对于两个构件的讹混产生了重要影响。对比两个偏旁的特点:一是形体上“衤”比“礻”多一道撇点笔画,二是意义上“礻”与祭祀有关,“衤”与服饰有关。利用这两个偏旁的区别特征有利于辨析两个偏旁的讹混以及从示字和从衣字的讹混。
The “demonstration” radical and the “clothing” radical are often confused when they serve as left-side components, due to their similar shapes “礻” and “衤”. By analyzing the shapes of the characters “示” and “衣” as well as their shapes as components, it is found that the deformation and simplification of the two components after the Han Dynasty, which was caused by the emergence and maturation of clerical script and regular script, had a significant impact on their confusion. Comparing the characteristics of the two radicals: firstly, in terms of shape, “衤” has an additional stroke of a slanting point compared to “礻”; secondly, in terms of meaning, “礻” is related to sacrifice while “衤” is associated with clothing. Utilizing these distinguishing features of the two radicals is conducive to the analysis of their confusion, as well as the confusion of characters with the “demonstration” and “clothing” radicals.
[1] | 刘钊. 古文字构形学[M]. 福州: 福建人民出版社, 2011: 139. |
[2] | 李学勤, 主编, 赵平安, 副主编. 字源1 [M]. 天津: 天津古籍出版社, 沈阳: 辽宁人民出版社, 2012: 3-729. |
[3] | 黄德宽, 主编, 徐在国, 副主编, 吴国升, 编著. 春秋文字字形表[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2017: 383. |
[4] | 徐在国, 程燕, 张振谦, 编著. 战国文字字形表 中[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2017: 1197. |
[5] | 臧克和. 汉魏六朝隋唐五代字形表[M]. 广州: 南方日报出版社, 2011: 997-1240. |
[6] | 黄德宽, 主编, 徐在国, 副主编, 夏大兆, 编著. 商代文字字形表[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2017: 9-351. |
[7] | 蒋善国. 汉字学[M]. 上海: 上海教育出版社, 1987: 200. |
[8] | 汉语大字典编辑委员会, 编纂. 汉语大字典[M]. 成都: 四川辞书出版社, 武汉: 崇文书局, 2010: 2555-3304. |
[9] | [汉]班固著. 汉书[M]. [唐]顔师古, 注. 北京: 中华书局, 1962: 3758. |
[10] | [清]郝懿行. 尔雅义疏[M]. 吴庆峰, 等, 点校. 济南: 齐鲁书社, 2010: 3245. |