|
船舶扣押的海事请求范围问题研究
|
Abstract:
船舶扣押作为一项传统的海事请求保全制度,充分吸收并借鉴了海事司法实践经验以及相关国际公约内容的成果,是目前海事司法实践中最为实用和普遍的海事请求保全方式,在《中华人民共和国海事诉讼特别程序法》中具有举足轻重的地位。其中,可以申请船舶扣押的海事请求范围是核心问题之一,要想在海事司法实践中合理合法地理解、运用船舶扣押制度,厘清海事请求的范围至关重要。本文通过探究船舶扣押的海事请求范围及现存问题,提出完善船舶扣押海事请求范围的相关路径。
As a traditional maritime claim preservation system, ship arrest has fully absorbed and learned from the experience of maritime judicial practice and the results of relevant international conventions. It is the most practical and common maritime claim preservation method in maritime judicial practice at present, and plays a pivotal role in the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Special Procedures for Maritime Litigation. Among them, the scope of maritime claims that can be applied for ship arrest is one of the core issues. In order to understand and apply ship arrest system reasonably and legally in maritime judicial practice, it is very important to clarify the scope of maritime claims. By exploring the scope of maritime claims of ship arrest and the existing problems, this paper puts forward the relevant path to improve the scope of maritime claims of ship arrest.
[1] | 关正义. 扣押船舶法律制度研究[M]. 上海: 法律出版社, 2007: 9. |
[2] | 马得懿. 海事请求类型化下船舶扣押管辖权审视[J]. 上海大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 34(4): 1-15. |
[3] | 张江艳.《海事诉讼特别程序法》的实施现状及其完善[J]. 海大法律评论, 2006(0): 377-411. |
[4] | 吕方园, 戴瑜. 中国船舶扣押存在问题及解决途径[J]. 大连海事大学学报(社会科学版), 2014(1): 42-45. |
[5] | 邹倩. 海事法院《受案范围》与《海诉法》第21条的落差与解决[J]. 武汉交通职业学院学报, 2019, 21(4): 22-27. |