The low comprehensive utilisation rate of PG has become a key issue restricting the sustainable development of the phosphorus chemical industry, and modifying PG to make land is a new way to improve the utilisation rate of PG resources and increase the amount of arable land. In this paper, lettuce was used as the test crop for potting simulation experiments, and three proportions of PG and soil were set up to study the effects of different treatments on the physicochemical properties of lettuce inter-root soil, the growth and development of lettuce, and to evaluate the quality of the land-creation soil environment and the safety of lettuce consumption. The results showed that the content of quick-acting phosphorus and quick-acting potassium increased significantly in all treatments compared with CK, with the T1 treatment showing the best enhancement effect, with a significant increase of 369.06% and 53.24% compared with CK; Among all the treatments, the T1 treatment was the most effective in enhancing the biological traits of lettuce, with biomass, stem thickness and stoutness index significantly enhanced by 30.06%, 17.70% and 28.77%, respectively, compared with CK; The heavy metal content of each treatment soil did not exceed the GB15618-2018 national standard limit value, T1 treatment lettuce edible part heavy metal content in line with the GB2762-2022 national standard limit value, indicating that modified PG land making use of the ratio under the feasibility, with the increase of modified PG ratio amount of the risk of heavy metal increases, T2 and T3 treatment lettuce edible part Pb content exceeded the GB2762-2022 national standard limit value, after the evaluation of comprehensive pollution index, T3 treatment soil is lightly polluted by lead. From the combined effect of PG land formation on lettuce growth and development and safety evaluation, the addition of PG land formation treatment with 50% of dry mass as the main raw material of PG is the treatment that achieves the maximum amount of PG elimination and safety for agricultural products in this experiment.
References
[1]
(2018). GB 15618-2018. Soil Environmental Quality Soil Pollution Risk Control Standards for Agricultural Land (for Trial Implementation).
[2]
(2022). GB 2762-2022. National Standard for Food Safety, Limits of Contaminants in Food.
[3]
Bai, L. H., Zhang, S. Y., Zhang, N. M. et al. (2011) Effects of Different Phosphogypsum Additions and Inoculation with Mycorrhizae on the Growth and Phosphorus, Arsenic and Sulfur Uptake of Corn. Journal of Environmental Science, 31, 2485-2492.
[4]
Bao, S. D. (2000). Soil Agrochemical Analysis (3rd ed.). China Agricultural Press.
[5]
Cai, L. (2001). Fertilizer Effect of Phosphogypsum on Oilseed Crops. Phosphorus Fertilizer and Compound Fertilizer, No. 6, 75.
[6]
Chen, Z. F., Shi, D. M., He, W. et al. (2020). Quality Assessment of Sloping Cropland in Yunnan Based on “Factor-Demand-Regulation”. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 36, 236-246.
[7]
China General Environmental Monitoring Station (1990). Background Values of Soil Elements in China. China Environmental Science Press.
[8]
Ghazi, N., Karaki, A. M., & Omoush, A. (2002). Wheat Response to Phosphogypsum and Mycorrhizal Fungi in Alkaline Soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 25, 873-883. https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-120002966
[9]
Gu, L. J, Bai, L. H., Zhang, N. M. et al. (2013). Enhancement Effect of Mycorrhizal Technology on the Agricultural Use of Phosphogypsum. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 29, 152-159.
[10]
Håkanson, L. (1980). An Ecological Risk Index for Aquatic Pollution Control: A Sedimentological Approach. Water Research, 14, 975-1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(80)90143-8
[11]
Li, J., Wu, H. S., Gao, Z. Q. et al. (2015). Impact of Phosphogypsum on CO2 Emission and Wheat Yield in Wheat Fields and Its Economic and Environmental Benefit Analysis. Environmental Science, 36, 3099-3105.
[12]
Liu, Y., Yang, S. Q., Zhang, W. F. et al. (2023). Effects of Phosphogypsum and Alkali Floc on Water Salinity and Bacterial Community Structure in Salinized Soil. Environmental Science, 44, 2325-2337.
[13]
Lu, W. H., Wang, Y. F., Liu, J. et al. (2023). Progress of Harmless Modification of PhoSphogypsum and Its Application in Agricultural Soil Improvement. Soil, 55, 699-707.
[14]
Ma, H. H., Zhang, L., Guo, F. et al. (2023). Ecological Risk and Transport Characteristics of Heavy Metals in Soils and Crops in Lead-Zinc Mining Areas of Guizhou. Environmental Science, 44, 2856-2867.
[15]
Ma, J. H., Han, C. X., & Jiang, Y. L. (2020). Some Problems in the Application of the Potential Ecological Risk Index Method. Geography Research, 39, 1233-1241.
[16]
Mao, J. G., Mao, X. Y., Yang, H. J. et al. (2023). Effects of Increasing Phosphogypsum Application on the Improvement of Mildly Saline Soil and Growth of Brassica Napus in North Jiangs. Jiangsu Agricultural Journal, 39, 699-706.
[17]
Michalovicz, L., Muller, M. L., Tormena, C. A. et al. (2019). Soil Chemical Attributes, Nutrient Uptake and Yield of No-Till Crops as Affected by Phosphogypsum Doses and Parceling in Southern Brazil. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 65, 385-399. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2018.1505041
[18]
Moussa, B., Jim, M., Leo, C. et al. (2020). Impacts of Phosphogypsum, Soluble Fertilizer and Lime Amendment of Acid Soils on the Bioavailability of Phosphorus and Sulphur under Lucerne (Medicago sativa). Plants, 9, Article 883. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9070883
[19]
Oszako, T., Pasławski, T., Szulc, W. et al. (2023). Short-Term Growth Response of Young Pine (Pinus silvestris) Seedlings to the Different Types of Soil Media Mixture with Phosphogypsum Formulations under Poland Forest Environmental Conditions. Forests, 14, Article 518. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14030518
[20]
Ou, Z. B., Yang, W. J., & He, B. B. (2021). Current Status of Comprehensive Utilization of Phosphogypsum at Home and Abroad. Yunnan Chemical Industry, 48, 6-9.
[21]
Shi, Y. X., Wu, S. H., Zhou, S. L. et al. (2016). Modeling of Heavy Metal Element Uptake, Transport and Accumulation Processes in Soil-Crop Systems. Environmental Science, 37, 3996-4003.
[22]
Shu, X. X., & Peng, B. (2019). Research on the Effect of Phosphogypsum and Organic Fertilizer Blending on the Moisture Environment of Saline Soil. Science, Technology and Innovation, 138, 72-73
[23]
Shu, Y. Z. (2019). Experimental Study on the Combined Improvement of Yunnan Red Soil by Phosphogypsum and Biomass Charcoal. Phosphorus Fertilizer and Compound Fertilizer, 34, 40-42.
[24]
Surendra, S., & Singh, S. K. (2016). Use of Indigenous Sources of Sulphur in Soils of Eastern India for Higher Crops Yield and Quality: A Review. Agricultural Reviews, 37, 117-124.
[25]
Wang, C. B., Cui, Y. L., Guo, T. W. et al. (2010). Agricultural Application of Phosphogypsum and Its Safety Evaluation. Soil Bulletin, 41, 408-412.
[26]
Wang, P., Li, Z. G., Liu, J. L. et al. (2019a). Apportionment of Sources of Heavy Metals to Agricultural Soils Using Isotope Fingerprints Andmultivariate Statistical Analyses. Environ-mental Pollution, 249, 208-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.034
[27]
Wang, X. B., Yan, X., Li, X. Y.,et al. (2019b). Environmental Safety Risks of Phosphogypsum for Agricultural Use. Chinese Agricultural Science, 52, 293-311.
[28]
Wang, Y. C., Li, J. J., Xie, T. et al. (2012). Characteristics of Cd and Zn Enrichment and Transport in Vegetables in Phosphogypsum-Amended Substrates. Chinese Agronomy Bulletin, 28, 271-275.
[29]
Wu, H. S., Chen, X. Q., Zhou, X. D. et al. (2012). Effects of Phosphogypsum Amendment on Physicochemical Properties and Wheat Growth of Coastal Saline Soil in Rudong, Jiangsu. Soil Science Journal, 49, 1262-1266.
[30]
Xiao, H. J., Wang, Z. Y., He, J. F. et al. (2008). Effects of Phosphogypsum on the Improvement of Strongly Acidic Yellow Soil. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 22, 62-66.
[31]
Xu, J. H., Shao, L. Y., Hou, H. H. et al. (2023). Current Status of Environmental Impact Studies in the Context of Comprehensive Utilization of Phosphogypsum. Journal of Mining Science, 8, 115-126.
[32]
Xu, J. J., Bao, L., Zhao, H. et al. (2018). Effects of Phosphogypsum on Acidity of Red Soil and Growth of Brassica napus. Phosphorus Fertilizer and Compound Fertilizer, 33, 34-37.
[33]
Xu, Z., Zhang, Y., Chen, X. J. et al. (2020). Study on Phosphogypsum Consumption Capacity of Rice Husk-Chicken Manure Aerobic High Temperature Composting System. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 36, 208-213.
[34]
Yao, J. P., Li, P., Xiong, Z. et al. (2012). Analysis of Soil Properties in Rocky Desertification Areas of Yunnan. China Agronomy Bulletin, 28, 43-46.
[35]
Ye, H. Z. (1998). Changes in Soil Physicochemical Properties of Red Soil Dryland Treated with Phosphogypsum. Jiangxi Agricultural Journal, 10, 59-65.
[36]
Yu, Q. F., Ning, P., & Yang, Y. H. (2008). Pretreatment of Phosphogypsum and Its Resource Utilization. Jiangxi Agricultural Journal, 20, 109-111.
[37]
Zhang, C. G., Yue, X. R., Shi, J. et al. (2014). Effects of Phosphogypsum from Different Origins on the Growth of Roasted Tobacco and the Risk of Arsenic Contamination in Kunming. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 23, 685-691.
[38]
Zhang, H., Xu, L., Li, P. F. et al. (2016). Problems and New Solutions of Phosphogypsum Utilization. Phosphorus Fertilizer and Compound Fertilizer, 31, 41-42.
