The objectives of this article are to examine persuasive argumentation as a means of fostering understanding, learning, and productive discourse rather than solely winning debates. It explores foundational principles, essential elements of persuasion, and a structured process for developing compelling arguments. Argumentation functions as a cognitive tool that clarifies thought, enhances decision-making, and facilitates knowledge construction. Effective argumentation integrates logic, emotion, and audience awareness while adhering to principles such as clarity, validity, soundness, and ethical responsibility. A persuasive argument relies on a well-defined claim, sound reasoning, and credible evidence, strengthened by rhetorical appeals such as ethos, pathos, and logos. Addressing counterarguments enhances credibility, promoting constructive discourse and critical engagement. Differences between oral and written argumentation underscore distinct advantages and challenges, while cultural considerations highlight the need for adaptable communication strategies tailored to diverse audiences. Practical applications include strategies for constructing persuasive arguments in leadership, change management, and research, where argumentation supports vision development, stakeholder engagement, and decision-making. Ethical considerations remain central, ensuring arguments build trust and credibility rather than manipulate audiences. By structuring change initiatives around a compelling argument, aligning it with effective leadership approaches, and reinforcing it with empirical evidence, argumentation becomes a powerful tool for driving meaningful impact. Ultimately, mastering persuasive argumentation enhances communication effectiveness, strengthens leadership capacity, and fosters informed decision-making in complex and evolving environments.
References
[1]
Adams, B. E. (2020). Reason-Giving in Deliberative Forums. JournalofDeliberativeDemocracy,10, 6. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.208
[2]
Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational Change: A Review of Theory and Research in the 1990s. JournalofManagement,25, 293-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500303
[3]
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2016). Argumentation for Learning: Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories. EducationalPsychologist,51, 164-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458
[4]
Badam, S. K., Liu, Z., & Elmqvist, N. (2019). Elastic Documents: Coupling Text and Tables through Contextual Visualizations for Enhanced Document Reading. IEEETransactionsonVisualizationandComputerGraphics,25, 661-671. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2018.2865119
[5]
Bailey, A., Zanchetta, M., Velasco, D., Pon, G., & Hassan, A. (2015). Building a Scholar in Writing (BSW): A Model for Developing Students’ Critical Writing Skills. NurseEducationinPractice,15, 524-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2015.07.008
[6]
Bench-Capon, T. J. M., Doutre, S., & Dunne, P. E. (2007). Audiences in Argumentation Frameworks. ArtificialIntelligence,171, 42-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2006.10.013
[7]
Blair, J. A. (2012). Argument and Its Uses. In C. W. Tindale (Ed.), Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair (pp. 185-195). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2363-4_14
[8]
Braet, A. C. (1992). Ethos, Pathos and Logos in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: A Re-Examination. Argumentation,6, 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00154696
[9]
Brown, N. J. S., Furtak, E. M., Timms, M., Nagashima, S. O., & Wilson, M. (2010). The Evidence-Based Reasoning Framework: Assessing Scientific Reasoning. EducationalAssessment,15, 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2010.530551
[10]
Brun, G., & Betz, G. (2016). Analysing Practical Argumentation. In S. O. Hansson, & G. Hirsch Hadorn (Eds.), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis: Reasoning about Uncertainty (pp. 39-77). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30549-3_3
[11]
Caminada, M., & Amgoud, L. (2007). On the Evaluation of Argumentation Formalisms. ArtificialIntelligence,171, 286-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.02.003
[12]
Carstens, L., Fan, X., Gao, Y., & Toni, F. (2015). An Overview of Argumentation Frameworks for Decision Support. In M. Croitoru, P. Marquis, S. Rudolph, & G. Stapleton (Eds.), Graph Structures for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (pp. 32-49). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28702-7_3
[13]
Castro, D. (2021). Argumentation and Persistent Disagreement. InformalLogic,41, 245-280. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v41i2.5580
[14]
Chen, Y. C., Park, S., & Hand, B. M. (2012). Unpacking the Use of Talk and Writing in Argument-Based Inquiry: Instruction and Cognition. In InternationalConferenceoftheLearningSciences (pp. 159-166). https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84878716168&origin=inward&txGid=0455fca454cf1e6845a4191b35822f30
[15]
Cheong, C., Zhu, X., & Xu, W. (2021). Source-Based Argumentation as a Form of Sustainable Academic Skill: An Exploratory Study Comparing Secondary School Students’ L1 and L2 Writing. Sustainability,13, Article No. 12869. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212869
[16]
Chesñevar, C., Mcginnis, Modgil, S., Rahwan, I., Reed, C., Simari, G. et al. (2006). Towards an Argument Interchange Format. TheKnowledgeEngineeringReview,21, 293-316. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269888906001044
[17]
Chinn, C. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1998). The Structure of Discussions That Promote Reasoning. TeachersCollegeRecord:TheVoiceofScholarshipinEducation,100, 315-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146819810000205
[18]
Chovancová, K. (2006). Vers une théorisation de la distinction entre l’oral et l’écrit. Verbum,8, 163-169. https://doi.org/10.1556/verb.8.2006.1.12
[19]
Clark, J. K., & Evans, A. T. (2014). Source Credibility and Persuasion: The Role of Message Position in Self-Validation. PersonalityandSocialPsychologyBulletin,40, 1024-1036. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214534733
[20]
Correia, V. (2012). The Ethics of Argumentation. InformalLogic,32, 222-241. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v32i2.3530
[21]
Crowell, A., & Kuhn, D. (2014). Developing Dialogic Argumentation Skills: A 3-Year Intervention Study. JournalofCognitionandDevelopment,15, 363-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.725187
[22]
Del Longo, S., & Cisotto, L. (2014). Writing to Argue: Writing as a Tool for Oral and Written Argumentation. In S. Del Longo (Ed.), WritingasaLearningActivity (pp. 15-43). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004265011_003
[23]
Dmytriyev, S., Freeman, R. E., & Haskins, M. E. (2016). Transforming Disagreements into Opportunities to Enhance Learning, Decision Making and Trust. Strategy&Leadership,44, 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/sl-12-2015-0094
[24]
Duran, C. (2022). Reflections on the Physical or Visceral Mode of Argumentation in Michael Gilbert’s Theory of Multi-Modal Argumentation and Its Relation to Gesture Studies and the Embodied Mind. InformalLogic,42, 583-601. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v42i3.7502
[25]
Felton, M., Crowell, A., & Liu, T. (2015). Arguing to Agree: Mitigating My-Side Bias Through Consensus-Seeking Dialogue. WrittenCommunication,32, 317-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088315590788
[26]
Ferretti, R. P., & Graham, S. (2019). Argumentative Writing: Theory, Assessment, and Instruction. ReadingandWriting,32, 1345-1357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09950-x
[27]
Ferretti, R. P., MacArthur, C. A., & Dowdy, N. S. (2000). The Effects of an Elaborated Goal on the Persuasive Writing of Students with Learning Disabilities and Their Normally Achieving Peers. JournalofEducationalPsychology,92, 694-702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.694
[28]
Goodman, J. (2018). On Defining “Argument”. Argumentation,32, 589-602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-018-9457-y
[29]
Goodwin, J., & Innocenti, B. (2019). The Pragmatic Force of Making an Argument. Topoi,38, 669-680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-019-09643-8
[30]
Groothuis, D. (2023). Avoiding Pitfalls in Reasoning. Think,22, 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1477175623000131
[31]
Gruszko, K., & Gajewski, T. (2022). Logos and Pathos in International Relations. DemocracyandSecurity,18, 321-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2021.2023357
[32]
Herman, T. (2022). Ethos and Pragmatics. Languages,7, 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7030165
[33]
Hornikx, J., & Hoeken, H. (2007). Cultural Differences in the Persuasiveness of Evidence Types and Evidence Quality. CommunicationMonographs,74, 443-463. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701716578
[34]
Hubbart, J. A. (2023a). Considering Use-Inspired Design and Tangible Impacts in the Agricultural Sector. Open Access Journal of Agricultural Research, 8, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.23880/oajar-16000323
[35]
Hubbart, J. A. (2023b). Harmonizing Science and Society: A Change Management Approach to Align Scientific Endeavors with Societal Needs. Sustainability, 15, Article No. 15233. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115233
[36]
Hubbart, J. A. (2023c). Organizational Change: Considering Truth and Buy-In. Administrative Sciences, 13, Article No. 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13010003
[37]
Hubbart, J. A. (2023d). Organizational Change: The Challenge of Change Aversion. Administrative Sciences, 13, Article No. 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13070162
[38]
Hubbart, J. A. (2024). A Primer for Organizational Change: Key Models, Theories, and Practices. AustinJournalofBusinessAdministrationandManagement,8, Article No. 1068.
[39]
Ibrahim, S. N. K. A., & Harun, J. (2015). A Meta-Analysis on Students’ Argumentative Knowledge Construction Process in Social Collaborative Learning Environment. In 2015InternationalConferenceonLearningandTeachinginComputingandEngineering (pp. 134-141). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/latice.2015.22
[40]
Iordanou, K., Kuhn, D., Matos, F., Shi, Y., & Hemberger, L. (2019). Learning by Arguing. LearningandInstruction,63, Article ID: 101207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.05.004
[41]
JananJohnson, A., Hample, D., & Cionea, I. A. (2014). Understanding Argumentation in Interpersonal Communication: The Implications of Distinguishing between Public and Personal Topics. AnnalsoftheInternationalCommunicationAssociation,38, 145-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2014.11679161
[42]
Johnson, A. J. (2009). A Functional Approach to Interpersonal Argument: Differences between Public-Issue and Personal-Issue Arguments. CommunicationReports,22, 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934210902798528
[43]
Klein, P., Boscolo, P., Kirkpatrick, L., Gelati, C., Del Longo, S., & Cisotto, L. (2014). WritingasaLearningActivity. Brill. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004265011
[44]
Klopp, E., & Stark, R. (2020). Learning to Argue from Others’ Erroneous Arguments—Fostering Argumentation Competence through Learning from Advocatory Errors. FrontiersinEducation,5, Article No. 126. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00126
[45]
Kotter, J. P. (2007). Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail. In MuseumManagementandMarketing (pp. 20-29). Routledge.
[46]
Kotter, J. P. (2012). LeadingChange. Harvard Business Press.
[47]
Kotter, J. P., & Whitehead, L. A. (2010). Buy-In:Saving Your Good Ideafrom Getting Shot down. Harvard Business Press.
[48]
Lin, Y., & Hung, J. (2016). The Analysis and Reconciliation of Students’ Rebuttals in Argumentation Activities. InternationalJournalofScienceEducation,38, 130-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1134848
[49]
Little, J. (1999). Confusion in the Classroom: Does Logos Mean Logic? JournalofTechnicalWritingandCommunication,29, 349-353. https://doi.org/10.2190/7aty-rvvu-53fj-mvc5
[50]
Luginbühl, M., & Müller-Feldmeth, D. (2022). Oral Argumentation Skills between Process and Product. Languages,7, Article No. 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020139
[51]
MacDougall, D., & Conrad, J. (2009). Credibility: Your Most Important Asset. Bioentrepreneur. https://doi.org/10.1038/bioe.2009.8
[52]
Martínez, M. L., & Valdivia, I. M. A. (2016). Promoting Student Metacognition through the Analysis of Their Own Debates. Is It Better with Text or with Graphics? Journal of Educational Technology & Society,19, 167-177.
[53]
Modgil, S., Toni, F., Bex, F., Bratko, I., Chesñevar, C. I., Dvořák, W. et al. (2013). The Added Value of Argumentation. In S. Ossowski (Ed.), Agreement Technologies (pp. 357-403). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5583-3_21
[54]
Monte-Sano, C. (2016). Argumentation in History Classrooms: A Key Path to Understanding the Discipline and Preparing Citizens. TheoryintoPractice,55, 311-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1208068
[55]
Mshvenieradze, T. (2013). Logos Ethos and Pathos in Political Discourse. TheoryandPracticeinLanguageStudies,3, 1939-1945. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.11.1939-1945
[56]
Nguyen, H., & Masthoff, J. (1990). Designing Persuasive Dialogue Systems: Using Argumentation with Care. In H. Oinas-Kukkonen, et al. (Eds.), Persuasive Technology (pp. 201-212). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68504-3_18
[57]
Nuruddin Hidayat, D., Nurhalimah, Defianty, M., Kultsum, U., Zulkifli, & Sufyan, A. (2020). Logical Fallacies in Social Media: A Discourse Analysis in Political Debate. In 20208thInternationalConferenceonCyberandITServiceManagement(CITSM) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/citsm50537.2020.9268821
[58]
Nussbaum, E. M., & Schraw, G. (2007). Promoting Argument-Counterargument Integration in Students’ Writing. TheJournalofExperimentalEducation,76, 59-92. https://doi.org/10.3200/jexe.76.1.59-92
[59]
Ovchinnikov, V. N., & Ketova, N. P. (2023). Changing the Paradigm of Natural Ecosystems Management. JournalofEconomicRegulation,14, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.17835/2078-5429.2023.14.1.049-058
[60]
Possebom, A. T., Morveli-Espinoza, M., & Tacla, C. A. (2019). Dialogue Model Using Arguments for Consensus Decision Making through Common Knowledge Formation. ComputingandInformatics,38, 575-596. https://doi.org/10.31577/cai_2019_3_575
[61]
Putu Dian Sawitri, N. L. (2019). Choose a Corner Strategy and 21st Century Skills in Argumentative Writing. KnESocialSciences,3, 102-112. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i10.3892
[62]
Rapanta, C. (2018). Potentially Argumentative Teaching Strategies and How to Empower Them. JournalofPhilosophyofEducation, 52, 451-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12304
[63]
Rapanta, C., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S. (2013). What Is Meant by Argumentative Competence? An Integrative Review of Methods of Analysis and Assessment in Education. ReviewofEducationalResearch,83, 483-520. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313487606
[64]
Rigotti, E., & Greco Morasso, S. (2009). Argumentation as an Object of Interest and as a Social and Cultural Resource. In N. M. Mirza, & A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), ArgumentationandEducation: Theoretical Foundations and Practices (pp. 9-66). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98125-3_2
[65]
Risse, T. (2000). “Let’s Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics. InternationalOrganization,54, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551109
[66]
Robinson, P. G. (2018). Logos, Ethos and Pathos: Whither Academia and Public Health in a Post-Truth World? CommunityDentalHealth,35, 3-4.
[67]
Ross, D., & Rossen-Knill, D. (2016). Features of Written Argument. Argumentation,30, 181-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9366-2
[68]
Sellars, R. (2006). Rhetoric. Theory,Culture&Society,23, 59-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327640602300212
[69]
Shum, S. B. (2007). There’s Nothing Like a Good Argument .... IEEESoftware,24, 21-23. https://doi.org/10.1109/ms.2007.148
[70]
Sillince, J. A. A. (2002). A Model of the Strength and Appropriateness of Argumentation in Organizational Contexts. JournalofManagementStudies,39, 585-618. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00001
[71]
Simard Smith, P. L., & Moldovan, A. (2011). Arguments as Abstract Objects. InformalLogic,31, 230-261. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v31i3.3401
[72]
Spence, G. (1996). HowtoArgue&WinEveryTime:AtHome, at Work, in Court,Everywhere,Everyday. Macmillan.
[73]
Steinberg, B., & Watkins, M. D. (2023). 10 Ways to Prove You’re a Strategic Thinker. TheHarvardBusinessReview. https://hbr.org/2023/10/10-ways-to-prove-youre-a-strategic-thinker?utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter_weekly&utm_campaign=insider_activesubs&utm_content=signinnudge&deliveryName=DM301488
[74]
Sueb, Purwaning Hartanti, L., & Rika Ayu, H. (2019). Promoting Counterargument in Student’s Argumentative Writing: A Dialogic Approach. In ProceedingsoftheSocialSciences,HumanitiesandEducationConference(SoSHEC2019) (pp. 133-136). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/soshec-19.2019.46
[75]
Sycara, K. P. (1990). Persuasive Argumentation in Negotiation. TheoryandDecision,28, 203-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00162699
[76]
Tan, C., Niculae, V., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., & Lee, L. (2016). Winning Arguments. In Proceedingsofthe25thInternationalConferenceonWorldWideWeb (pp. 613-624). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee. https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2883081
[77]
Tannen, D. (1982). The Myth of Orality and Literacy. In W. Frawley (Ed.), LinguisticsandLiteracy (pp. 37-50). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9302-7_3
[78]
Van Der Vleuten, P. M., Dolmans, D., & Scherpbier, C. (2000). The Need for Evidence in Education. MedicalTeacher,22, 246-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590050006205
[79]
Van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2003). References. In F. H. V. Eemeren, & R. Grootendorst (Eds.), ASystematicTheoryofArgumentation:The Pragma-Dialectical Approach (pp. 197-206). Cambridge University Press.
[80]
Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Johnson, R. H., Plantin, C., & Willard, C. A. (2013). FundamentalsofArgumentationTheory. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203811306
[81]
Walton, D. (2013). MethodsofArgumentation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139600187
[82]
Zarefsky, D. (2020). Underlying Assumptions of Examining Argumentation Rhetorically. Argumentation,34, 297-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09501-2
