|
|
ChatGPT在学术写作中的应用研究
|
Abstract:
学术写作是一项重要但又艰巨的任务，但随着人工智能技术的发展，ChatGPT有望成为简化学术写作的潜力工具。本文从确定研究问题、进行文献综述、选择研究方法、数据收集、数据分析、撰写初稿和修改定稿这七大学术写作流程出发论述ChatGPT在学术写作中的创新应用，总结了ChatGPT提高写作效率和促进作者头脑风暴的优势。但是ChatGPT辅助学术写作过程中也可能引发一些问题，如学术造假和引用、生成内容准确性不足等。为更好发挥ChatGPT在学术写作中的效能，对用户提出遵守ChatGPT的使用指南、批判性看待ChatGPT输出内容及掌握提示工程技能的策略，对学术机构提出开发运用更为先进的检测方法的策略，最后展望未来可能的研究方向。
Academic writing is an important but difficult task, but with the development of artificial intelligence technology, ChatGPT is expected to become a potential tool for simplifying academic writing. This paper discusses the innovative application of ChatGPT in academic writing from seven academic writing processes: identifying research questions, conducting literature review, selecting research methods, data collection, data analysis, writing the first draft and revising the final draft, and summarizing the advantages of ChatGPT in improving writing efficiency and promoting authors’ brainstorming. However, ChatGPT may also cause some problems in the process of assisting academic writing, such as academic fraud and citations, and insufficient accuracy of generated content. In order to better exploit the effectiveness of ChatGPT in academic writing, this paper proposes strategies for users to follow ChatGPT usage guidelines, critically view ChatGPT output content and master prompt engineering skills, proposes strategies for academic institutions to develop and apply more advanced detection methods, and finally looks into possible future research directions.
| [1] | 林亦农. 学术问题与学术写作之“辨” [J]. 应用写作, 2023(10): 30-32. |
| [2] | Kallestinova, E.D. (2011) How to Write Your First Research Paper. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 84, 181-190. |
| [3] | Cortina, M.S. (2023) The Why, What, and How of Publishing a Manuscript: A Blend of Art and Science. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 71, 2930-2931. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_1930_23 |
| [4] | Honavar, S.G. (2023) Eye of the AI Storm: Exploring the Impact of AI Tools in Ophthalmology. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 71, 2328-2340. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_1478_23 |
| [5] | Yan, D. (2023) Impact of ChatGPT on Learners in a L2 Writing Practicum: An Exploratory Investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 13943-13967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4 |
| [6] | Flower, L. and Hayes, J.R. (1981) A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600 |
| [7] | European Commission (2021) Proposal for a Regulation on a European Approach for Artificial Intelligence. European Commission. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-regulation-european-approach-artificial-intelligence |
| [8] | Müller, V.C. (2020) Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. In: Zalta, E.N., Eds., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 1-70. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/ethics-ai/ |
| [9] | Vesnic-Alujevic, L., Nascimento, S. and Pólvora, A. (2020) Societal and Ethical Impacts of Artificial Intelligence: Critical Notes on European Policy Frameworks. Telecommunications Policy, 44, Article ID: 101961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101961 |
| [10] | 张雷, 张家诚, 许弘楷. 人工智能伦理: 体系构建与治理质量[J/OL]. 宏观质量研究: 1-17. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1848.c.20250124.1343.008.html, 2025-01-30. |
| [11] | 陶婷婷, 李本乾. 基于算法机理的生成式人工智能伦理评价指标体系构建与治理研究[J]. 新闻与写作, 2024(11): 74-86. |
| [12] | Mondal, H. and Mondal, S. (2023) ChatGPT in Academic Writing: Maximizing Its Benefits and Minimizing the Risks. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 71, 3600-3606. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_718_23 |
| [13] | 苏婧, 戴润韬. 说理思维与故事思维: 学术写作与新闻写作的相互借鉴[J]. 新闻与写作, 2024(2): 108-110. |
| [14] | van Dis, E.A.M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R. and Bockting, C.L. (2023) ChatGPT: Five Priorities for Research. Nature, 614, 224-226. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7 |
| [15] | Bedington, A., Halcomb, E.F., McKee, H.A., Sargent, T. and Smith, A. (2024) Writing with Generative AI and Human-Machine Teaming: Insights and Recommendations from Faculty and Students. Computers and Composition, 71, Article ID: 102833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102833 |
| [16] | Thorp, H.H. (2023) ChatGPT Is Fun, but Not an Author. Science, 379, 313-313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879 |
| [17] | Poldrack, R.A., Baker, C.I., Durnez, J., Gorgolewski, K.J., Matthews, P.M., Munafò, M.R., et al. (2017) Scanning the Horizon: Towards Transparent and Reproducible Neuroimaging Research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18, 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.167 |
| [18] | 田一然, 吴佳潞. 跨越边界的社会工作: 社会工作参与边境服务的选择性嵌入策略——基于ChatGPT赋能学术写作的探索[J]. 魁阁学刊, 2023(2): 169-186. |
| [19] | Dunn, W.R., Lyman, S. and Marx, R. (2003) Research methodology. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 19, 870-873. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-8063(03)00705-9 |
| [20] | Chukwuere, J.E. (2024) Today’s Academic Research: The Role of ChatGPT Writing. Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 6, 30-46. https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v6i1.639 |
| [21] | 郭茜, 冯瑞玲, 华远方. ChatGPT在英语学术论文写作与教学中的应用及潜在问题[J]. 外语电化教学, 2023(2): 18-23, 107. |
| [22] | Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P. and Ben Saad, H. (2023) From Human Writing to Artificial Intelligence Generated Text: Examining the Prospects and Potential Threats of ChatGPT in Academic Writing. Biology of Sport, 40, 615-622. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623 |
| [23] | (2023) Guidance on the Use of Large Language Models (LLM) e.g. ChatGPT. Springer Nature Press. |
| [24] | Bom, H.H. (2023) Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges of ChatGPT in Academic Writing: A Roundtable Discussion. Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 57, 165-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-023-00809-2 |
| [25] | Jarrah, A.M., Wardat, Y. and Fidalgo, P. (2023) Using ChatGPT in Academic Writing Is (not) a Form of Plagiarism: What Does the Literature Say? Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13, e202346. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13572 |
| [26] | Giray, L. (2023) Prompt Engineering with ChatGPT: A Guide for Academic Writers. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 51, 2629-2633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03272-4 |
| [27] | HS Kumar, A. (2023) Analysis of ChatGPT Tool to Assess the Potential of Its Utility for Academic Writing in Biomedical Domain. Biology, Engineering, Medicine and Science Reports, 9, 24-30. https://doi.org/10.5530/bems.9.1.5 |
| [28] | 赵晓伟, 戴岭, 沈书生, 等. 促进高意识学习的教育提示语设计[J]. 开放教育研究, 2024, 30(1): 44-54. |
