|
Modern Management 2025
我国农村养老保障制度的演进——基于政策反馈理论分析
|
Abstract:
建立并完善农村养老保障是积极应对人口老龄化、保障农村地区群众基本养老权益的重要举措,也是高质量社会保障体系重要组成部分,更是全面推进乡村振兴工作中的重要任务。政策反馈理论认为公共政策不仅是决策的产物,也是决策产生的原因,能够通过影响政治过程来影响未来的政策制定。我国农村养老保障的发展历程,深刻揭示了公共政策的双重属性:它既是政治进程的产物,也是关键的投入要素。过往政策通过解释效应、资源效应、演化效应和学习效应,对后续政策的内容与走向起到了关键的塑造作用。基于政策反馈效应机制,为推动农村养老保障发展,我们应当加大政府投入、均衡养老资源供给、深化政策理解、理性看待政策演化、强化政策学习。以此不断完善农村养老保障制度,切实保障农村居民的养老权益,为乡村振兴工作的稳步推进提供有力支撑。
Establishing and improving rural old-age security is an important measure for actively responding to population ageing and safeguarding the basic old-age rights and interests of people in rural areas, as well as an important component of a high-quality social security system, and an important task in the comprehensive promotion of rural revitalization. Policy feedback theory holds that public policy is not only the product of decision-making, but also the cause of decision-making, and can influence future policymaking by influencing the political process. The development history of China’s rural old-age security has profoundly revealed the dual attributes of public policy: it is both a product of the political process and a key input element. Past policies have played a key role in shaping the content and direction of subsequent policies through explanatory effects, resource effects, evolutionary effects and learning effects. Based on the mechanism of policy feedback effect, in order to promote the development of rural old-age security, we should increase the government’s investment, balance the supply of old-age resources, deepen the understanding of policies, rationally view the evolution of policies, and strengthen policy learning. In this way, we can continuously improve the rural old-age security system, effectively protect the rights and interests of rural residents, and provide strong support for the steady progress of rural revitalization.
[1] | 第七次全国人口普查公报(第五号)——人口年龄构成情况[EB/OL]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-05/11/content_5605787.htm, 2021-05-11. |
[2] | 牛文涛, 姜润鸽. 新中国70年的农村养老保障: 历史演进与现实困境[J]. 农业经济问题, 2020(2): 54-64. |
[3] | 习近平: 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-10/25/content_5721685.htm, 2022-10-25. |
[4] | 许亚敏. 我国农村养老保障事业发展的历程、现状与政策取向研究——基于制度分析的视角[J]. 社会保障研究, 2009(6): 18-26. |
[5] | 李素利, 白延涛. 政府农村养老保障服务能力对服务质量的影响研究——基于不确定政策下的调查证据[J]. 公共管理学报, 2016, 13(4): 65-76, 155-156. |
[6] | 雷咸胜. 新中国成立以来农村养老保障政策的演进——基于间断—均衡理论框架的分析[J]. 广东行政学院学报, 2019, 31(5): 23-32. |
[7] | 王华, 樊志民. 评《精准施策赋能农村养老保障: 西南农村留守老人养老需求与政策供给精准化研究》[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(17): 2, 189. |
[8] | 李雷, 张文斌. 失地农民养老保障困境及对策研究[J]. 农业经济, 2020(8): 76-78. |
[9] | 许照红. 我国农村养老模式的历史变革与现实选择[J]. 特区经济, 2007(6): 114-115. |
[10] | 蒋军成. 农村养老保障的制度演进与发展趋势探析[J]. 云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 34(2): 67-77. |
[11] | 封铁英, 高鑫. 路径依赖与路径创造: 中国养老保险制度变迁逻辑[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2020(5): 58-67. |
[12] | 翟文康, 邱一鸣. 政策如何塑造政治?——政策反馈理论述评[J]. 中国行政管理, 2022(3): 39-49. |
[13] | Rosenbloom, D., Meadowcroft, J. and Cashore, B. (2019) Stability and Climate Policy? Harnessing Insights on Path Dependence, Policy Feedback, and Transition Pathways. Energy Research & Social Science, 50, 168-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.009 |
[14] | Weaver, K. (2010) Paths and Forks or Chutes and Ladders? Negative Feedbacks and Policy Regime Change. Journal of Public Policy, 30, 137-162. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x10000061 |
[15] | 汪璐蒙, 曾泉海. 中国农村养老保障: 制度变迁、供需失衡与完善进路[J]. 南方金融, 2023(9): 28-40. |
[16] | 阳旭东, 王德文. 从缺位到归位——新中国成立以来农村养老保障与政府责任的再思考[J]. 学术界, 2019(1): 101-108. |
[17] | 杜孝珍, 郑一鸣. 反馈机制如何影响政策变迁——农村养老保障政策变迁过程的政策反馈解释[J]. 中共福建省委党校(福建行政学院)学报, 2023(3): 132-142. |
[18] | 海龙. 城乡居民基本养老保险财政补贴政策的缘起、发展与走向[J]. 中州学刊, 2021(4): 71-77. |
[19] | Skogstad, G. (2016) Policy Feedback and Self-Reinforcing and Self-Undermining Processes in EU Biofuels Policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 24, 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1132752 |
[20] | 王婷. 政策工具的权变主义研究——基于农村社会养老保险政策的考察分析[J]. 社会科学, 2018(2): 37-48. |
[21] | 王培杰, 彭雨馨, 张友浪. 政策设计、政策认同和生育偏好——基于“独生子女”政策的反馈效应分析[J]. 公共行政评论, 2022, 15(5): 27-48, 196-197. |
[22] | 王婷, 李放. 中国养老保险政策变迁的历史逻辑思考[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2016(3): 72-78. |
[23] | 朱旭峰, 赵慧. 自下而上的政策学习——中国三项养老保险政策的比较案例研究[J]. 南京社会科学, 2015(6): 68-75. |