全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Audit of Fracture Clinic Services: Compliance with BOAST (British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics) Guidelines

DOI: 10.4236/ojo.2025.153014, PP. 126-140

Keywords: BOAST Guidelines, Fracture Clinic Audit, Trauma and Orthopedics, Imaging Delays, Patient Satisfaction, Fracture Management, Virtual Fracture Clinics (VFCs), Multidisciplinary Care in Orthopedics, Frailty Pathway, Service Optimization in Fracture Clinics

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background: The British Orthopedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST) provide guidelines for optimal fracture clinic management. However, compliance with these standards varies across healthcare institutions. This study evaluates the adherence of a fracture clinic to BOAST guidelines, focusing on imaging efficiency, patient satisfaction, and appointment scheduling. Methods: A prospective audit was conducted over four weeks (July 1st - 30th, 2024) at Queens Hospital Romford, reviewing 50 consecutive patients. Data were collected using structured questionnaires covering demographics, treatment timelines, imaging delays, frailty service referrals, and patient-reported satisfaction. Statistical analysis included Chi-square tests and Mann-Whitney U tests to assess associations between delays and patient satisfaction. Results: Among the 50 patients, 30% experienced imaging delays exceeding 10 days (about 1 and a half weeks), and 25% faced follow-up delays beyond BOAST recommendations. A strong negative correlation (-0.658, p < 0.05) was observed between imaging delay and patient satisfaction. Patients with severe fractures reported a 0% satisfaction rate, underscoring the need for specialized care prioritization. Conclusion: The audit highlights significant inefficiencies in fracture clinic operations, particularly in imaging and appointment scheduling delays, impacting patient satisfaction. Implementing fast-track imaging protocols, enhanced scheduling, and optimized multidisciplinary referrals is recommended to improve BOAST guideline compliance and patient outcomes. A re-audit is necessary to assess the impact of these interventions.

References

[1]  Wikipedia (2025) Sir Robert Jones, 1st Baronet.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Robert_Jones,_1st_Baronet
[2]  British Orthopaedic Association (2025) History of the British Orthopaedic Association.
https://www.boa.ac.uk/about-us/history-of-the-boa.html
[3]  Wikipedia (2025) James Hogarth Pringle.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Hogarth_Pringle
[4]  Rhind, J.H., Ramhamadany, E., Collins, R., Govilkar, S., Dass, D. and Hay, S. (2020) An Analysis of Virtual Fracture Clinics in Orthopaedic Trauma in the UK during the Coronavirus Crisis. EFORT Open Reviews, 5, 442-448.
https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.200041
[5]  Jenkins, P., Gilmour, A., Murray, O., et al. (2014) The Glasgow Fracture Pathway: A Virtual Clinic. BJJ News, 2, 22-24.
[6]  Jenkins, P.J., Morton, A., Anderson, G., Van Der Meer, R.B. and Rymaszewski, L.A. (2016) Fracture Clinic Redesign Reduces the Cost of Outpatient Orthopaedic Trauma Care. Bone & Joint Research, 5, 33-36.
https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.52.2000506
[7]  Anderson, G.H., Jenkins, P.J., McDonald, D.A., Van Der Meer, R., Morton, A., Nugent, M., et al. (2017) Cost Comparison of Orthopaedic Fracture Pathways Using Discrete Event Simulation in a Glasgow Hospital. BMJ Open, 7, e014509.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014509
[8]  Vardy, J., Jenkins, P.J., Clark, K., Chekroud, M., Begbie, K., Anthony, I., et al. (2014) Effect of a Redesigned Fracture Management Pathway and ‘Virtual’ Fracture Clinic on ED Performance. BMJ Open, 4, e005282.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005282
[9]  (2020) Legal Aspects of Virtual Fracture Clinics.
https://www.boa.ac.uk/resources/medicolegal-articles/legal-aspects-of-virtual-fracture-clinics.html
[10]  Jenkins, P., Sng, S., Brooksbank, K. and Brooksbank, A. (2016) Socioeconomic Deprivation and Age Are Barriers to the Online Collection of Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Orthopaedic Patients. The Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 98, 40-44.
https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2016.0007
[11]  Ferguson, K.B., McGlynn, J., Jenkins, P., Madeley, N.J., Kumar, C.S. and Rymaszewski, L. (2015) Fifth Metatarsal Fractures—Is Routine Follow-Up Necessary? Injury, 46, 1664-1668.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.041
[12]  Gamble, D., Jenkins, P.J., Edge, M.J., Gilmour, A., Anthony, I.C., Nugent, M., et al. (2015) Satisfaction and Functional Outcome with “Self-Care” for the Management of Fifth Metacarpal Fractures. HAND, 10, 607-612.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-015-9749-8
[13]  Brooksbank, K., Jenkins, P.J., Anthony, I.C., Gilmour, A., Nugent, M.P. and Rymaszewski, L.A. (2014) Functional Outcome and Satisfaction with a “Self-Care” Protocol for the Management of Mallet Finger Injuries: A Case-Series. Journal of Trauma Management & Outcomes, 8, Article No. 21.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13032-014-0021-y
[14]  Jayram, P., Bahattacharyya, R. and Jenkins, P. (2014) Patient Satisfaction Following Management of Radial Head and Neck Fractures in A Virtual Fracture Clinic. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 23, 297-301.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133