全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Can Hydrologic Modeling Be a Solution for Transboundary Agreements?

DOI: 10.4236/cweee.2025.142004, PP. 61-76

Keywords: Juba River Basin, Transboundary Rivers, HSPF Model, Satellite Data Products

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Due to the colonial partition, many rivers in Africa are transboundary rivers shared by several riparian countries. Transboundary rivers in Africa have serious river basin management challenges mainly due to a lack of meteorological and hydrometric data limitations. Many African countries lack the technical knowledge and the financial resources needed to manage large river basins such as the Juba, Shabelle, Niger, Senegal, Zimbabwe, Nile, and Congo. In developed countries where meteorological and hydrometric data are available, river basins such as the Colorado and the Chesapeake in the United States are managed with hydrological models. Hydrological models require meteorological data as model input data and hydrometric data for model calibration and validation. In recent years, the acquisition of freely available global satellite data products offers model input data for developing countries with limited data acquisition capabilities. The study develops a watershed model for the Juba River Basin (JRB) shared by Somalia, Kenya, and Ethiopia. The HSPF (Hydrological Simulation Program-Fortran (HSPF) was selected for the study. Several satellite precipitation and evapotranspiration data products were evaluated, and CHIRPS precipitation and MERRA-2 evapotranspiration products gave the best model performance results. The acquisition of the satellite data products resolved the precipitation and the evapotranspiration model input data limitations. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), Percent Bias (PBIAS), and coefficient of determination (R2) performance metric ratings ranged from very good to satisfactory. The model simulated 39 years of daily flow data at selected sites in Somalia and Ethiopia. The simulated flow is suitable for addressing the river basin management solutions and establishing low flow indices and flood frequency analyses required for setting the groundwork for transboundary water management cooperations among riparian countries. The proposed solution generates daily river flow data anywhere in the basin. Given the meteorology and the hydrometric data limitations faced by many countries in Africa, applications of readily and freely available global satellite data offer solutions to the data scarcity faced by many countries in Africa. The paper presents a cost-effective river basin management solution for developing countries with limited river basin management data.

References

[1]  Houghton-Carr, H.A., Print, C.R., Fry, M.J., Gadain, H. and Muchiri, P. (2011) An Assessment of the Surface Water Resources of the Juba-Shabelle Basin in Southern Somalia. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56, 759-774.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.585470
[2]  Singh, V.P. and Frevert, D.K. (2010) Watershed Models. CRC Press.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420037432
[3]  African Development Bank (2022) Climate Proofing Transboundary Water Agreements in Africa.
https://hidropolitikakademi.org/en/article/30369/climate-proofing-transboundary-water-agreements-in-africa
[4]  Sarfaraz, M.U., Hall, D.M. and Rotman, R.M. (2022) Data Sharing in Transboundary Water Management. Frontiers in Water, 4, Article 982605.
https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.982605
[5]  Mourad, K.A. (2020) A Water Compact for Sustainable Water Management. Sustainability, 12, Article 7339.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187339
[6]  Jarvis, A., Reuter, H., Nelson, A. and Guevara, E. (2008) Hole-Filled SRTM for the Globe Version 4. CGIAR-CSI SRTM 90 m Database.
http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org
[7]  Bontemps, S., Defourny, P., Brockmann, C., Herold, M., Kalogirou, V. and Arino, O. (2012) New Global Land Cover Mapping Exercise in the Framework of the ESA Climate Change Initiative. 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Munich, 22-27 July 2012, 44-47.
https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6351640
[8]  Funk, C., Peterson, P., Landsfeld, M., Pedreros, D., Verdin, J., Shukla, S., et al. (2015) The Climate Hazards Infrared Precipitation with Stations—A New Environmental Record for Monitoring Extremes. Scientific Data, 2, Article No. 150066.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.66
[9]  Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M.J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs, L., et al. (2017) The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2). Journal of Climate, 30, 5419-5454.
https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-16-0758.1
[10]  Mohamoud, Y. and Zhang, H. (2019) Applications of Linked and Nonlinked Com-plex Models for TMDL Development: Approaches and Challenges. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 24, Article ID: 4018055.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Applications-of-Linked-and-Nonlinked-Complex-Models-Mohamoud-Zhang/6ed34b2a654969775a22056c9b1f35649406db23
[11]  Mohamoud, Y. (2003) Water Resources Management and Planning Tools for Georgia River Basins. Proceedings of the 2003 Georgia Water Resources Conference, Athens, 23-24 April 2003.
https://repository.gatech.edu/entities/publication/05b4f54b-9744-4b97-a591-ad0719368e40/full
[12]  Renard, B., Kavetski, D., Kuczera, G., Thyer, M. and Franks, S.W. (2010) Understanding Predictive Uncertainty in Hydrologic Modeling: The Challenge of Identifying Input and Structural Errors. Water Resources Research, 46, W05521.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009wr008328
[13]  Moriasi, D.N., Arnold, J.G., Van Liew, M.W., Bingner, R.L., Harmel, R.D. and Veith, T.L. (2007) Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50, 885-900.
https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153
[14]  Januário, T.E., Pereira Filho, A.J. and Salviano, M.F. (2022) Hydrometeorological Modeling of Limpopo River Basin in Mozambique with TOPMODEL and Remote Sensing. Open Journal of Modern Hydrology, 12, 55-73.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmh.2022.122004
[15]  Johnson, M.S., Coon, W.F., Mehta, V.K., Steenhuis, T.S., Brooks, E.S. and Boll, J. (2003) Application of Two Hydrologic Models with Different Runoff Mechanisms to a Hillslope Dominated Watershed in the Northeastern US: A Comparison of HSPF and SMR. Journal of Hydrology, 284, 57-76.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.07.005
[16]  Wurbs, R.A. (2006) Methods for Developing Naturalized Monthly Flows at Gaged and Ungaged Sites. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 11, 55-64.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2006)11:1(55)
[17]  Eckhardt, K. (2008) A Comparison of Baseflow Indices, Which Were Calculated with Seven Different Baseflow Separation Methods. Journal of Hydrology, 352, 168-173.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.01.005
[18]  Ames, D.P. (2006) Estimating 7Q10 Confidence Limits from Data: A Bootstrap Approach. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 132, 204-208.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2006)132:3(204)
[19]  Baker, D.B., Richards, R.P., Loftus, T.T. and Kramer, J.W. (2004) A New Flashiness Index: Characteristics and Applications to Midwestern Rivers and Streams. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 40, 503-522.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb01046.x
[20]  England Jr., J.F., Cohn, T.A., Faber, B.A., Stedinger, J.R., Thomas Jr., W.O., Veilleux, A.G., Kiang, J.E. and Mason Jr., R.R. (2018) Guidelines for Determining Flood Flow Frequency—Bulletin 17C.
https://doi.org/10.3133/tm4B5

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133