Application of Quantitative Evaluation System Based on Sensitive Indicators of Accelerated Rehabilitation Nursing in Patients with Pancreaticoduodenal Surgery
Objective: To explore the application effect of a quantitative evaluation system based on accelerated rehabilitation (ERAS) nursing-sensitive indicators in patients with pancreaticoduodenal surgery. Methods: 60 patients with pancreaticoduodenal surgery in our hospital from January 2021 to October 2023 were selected as the research objects by using the prospective research method. The random number table method was divided into two groups: the reference group (n = 30, taking routine nursing) and the research group (n = 30, the reference group plus the quantitative evaluation system nursing based on eras nursing sensitive indicators). The intervention duration of the two groups was 14 days. The rehabilitation, nutritional status [nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002), nutritional index (PNI)], simplified Comfort Scale (GCQ) score, gastrointestinal quality of life (GIQLI) score, and postoperative complication rate were compared between the two groups. Results: The exhaust time, intestinal function recovery time, hospitalization time, and hospitalization expenses of the study group were lower than those of the reference group (p < 0.05). After the intervention, the NRS score of the two groups was lower than that before the intervention, and the PNI was higher than that before the intervention (p < 0.05). After the intervention, the NRS score of the study group was lower than that of the reference group, and the PNI was higher than that of the reference group (p < 0.05). The GCQ and GIQLI scores of the two groups after the intervention were higher than those before the intervention (p < 0.05). The GCQ and GIQLI scores of the study group after the intervention were higher than those of the reference group (p < 0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications in the study group was 3.33% lower than 26.67% in the reference group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The quantitative evaluation system based on eras nursing sensitivity index has a significant effect on the intervention of pancreaticoduodenal surgery, which can promote the postoperative rehabilitation of patients, improve the nutritional health status, comfort, and quality of life, and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.
References
[1]
Karim, S.A.M., Abdulla, K.S., Abdulkarim, Q.H. and Rahim, F.H. (2018) The Outcomes and Complications of Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple Procedure): Cross Sectional Study. International Journal of Surgery, 52, 383-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.041
[2]
Mantzavinou, A., Uppara, M., Chan, J. and Patel, B. (2022) Robotic versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Comparing Therapeutic Indexes; a Systematic Review. International Journal of Surgery, 101, Article 106633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106633
[3]
Hussein, H.K., Ibrahim, N., Abdulrahman, Y.H., et al. (2023) Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Increased Adoption and Improved Outcomes: Is Laparoscopy Still Justified? Annals of Surgery, 278, e563-e569. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005687
[4]
Zhang, J.Z., Li, S., Zhu, W.H., Leng, X.S., Gao, J. and Zhang, D.F. (2022) Subtotal Gastrectomy Pancreaticoduodenectomy versus Conventional Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Incidence of Delayed Gastric Emptying: Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study. BMC Surgery, 22, Article No. 376. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01824-4
[5]
Emmanuel, M., Kristoffer, L., Didier, R., et al. (2020) Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreatoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Recommendations 2019. World Journal of Surgery, 44, 2056-2084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05462-w
[6]
Tan, H.T., Gao, Y., Liang, M.L., et al. (2019) Analysis of the Value of Early Multi Index Joint Prediction of Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Non Diabetes Patients. International Journal of Surgery, 46, 590-595.
[7]
The Pancreatic Surgery Group of the Surgery Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, the Minimally Invasive Treatment Group of the Pancreatic Disease Branch of the China Association for the Promotion of International Exchange in Healthcare, and the Minimally Invasive Treatment Group of the Pancreatic Disease Professional Committee of the Chinese Research Hospital Association, and et al. (2017) Expert Consensus on Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Surgery (Attached: Surgical Process and Main Steps). Chinese Journal of Surgery, 55, 335-339.
[8]
Feng, D.F., Li, Q., Sha, Y.P., et al. (2022) A Single Center Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Chinese Journal of General Surgery, 31, 295-303.
[9]
Yu, L., Zhang, Y.Y., Huang, L., et al. (2023) Risk Factors for Severe Complications after Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients. Surgical Theory and Practice, 28, 139-146.
[10]
Tang, H.Z., Xie, S.H., Xu, C., et al. (2018) The Application of Rapid Recovery Surgery in Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Journal of Wannan Medical College, 37, 602-605.
[11]
Ni, J.M. (2021) Application of Rapid Rehabilitation Surgical Nursing in the Perioperative Period of Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Chinese Medical Records, 22, 87-89.
[12]
Wang, Z.X., Zhang, X.W. (2022) Application of the Concept of Accelerated Rehabilitation Surgery in the Perioperative Period of Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Chinese Journal of Experimental Diagnosis, 26, 203-207.
[13]
Cao, X.T., Ning, C.H., Li, J.R., et al. (2021) The Application Value of Rapid Rehabilitation Surgery in Perioperative Management of Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Chinese Journal of General Surgery, 30, 305-312.
[14]
Cai, J.H., He, J.Q., Liu, M., et al. (2020) The Value of Prognostic Nutritional Index in the Prognosis of Patients with Pancreatic Head and Periampullary Cancer after Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Chinese Journal of Liver Surgery, 9, 439-444.
[15]
Dong, F.F., Zhao, S.M., Lu, H.P., et al. (2019) Application of a Comprehensive Nutrition Management Model Based on Accelerated Rehabilitation Surgery in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Western Medicine, 31, 1952-1956.
[16]
Wan, B.S., Zhang, L., He, T., et al. (2018) Application of Enteral Nutrition in Preventing Postoperative Gastroparesis after Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Journal of Bengbu Medical College, 43, 885-886, 891.
[17]
Feng, A.F., Cheng, Y.L., Wang, J., et al. (2018) The Impact of Timing of Enteral Nutrition on Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Western Medicine, 30, 1616-1619.
[18]
Pan, J.P., Wu, Y.F. and Zhu, X.H. (2023) The Effect of Early Enteral Nutrition Combined with Parenteral Nutrition on Patients after Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Chinese Clinical Research, 36, 176-181.
[19]
Liu, J., Zhou, L.L., Liu, H.Y., et al. (2019) Application of Nursing Quality Sensitivity Indicators to Evaluate the Efficacy of Integrated Nursing in Pancreatic Surgery. Northwest Journal of Defense Medicine, 40, 119-122.
[20]
Lin, X.L. and Ni, R.P. (2023) Application of Multidisciplinary Collaborative Accelerated Rehabilitation Surgery in Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer. Advances in Modern General Surgery in China, 26, 738-740.
