|
无证经营成品油行为的定性问题研究——兼论《刑法修正案(十一)》对非法经营罪的限缩适用
|
Abstract:
非法经营罪的限缩适用一直是学界和实务关注的问题。2021年3月1日起实施的《刑法修正案(十一)》增设了危险作业罪,此罪名的设立对后续实务中非法经营罪的适用予以一定程度的限缩。在无证经营成品油类案件中,这一限缩影响表现得尤为突出。聚焦无证经营成品油类案件,梳理总结《刑法修正案(十一)》实施前后的公开案例,从前置法规范、法益保护、其他罪状要素三个层面,分析无证经营成品油行为的定性问题,对非法经营罪和危险作业罪的适用进行辨析,明确《刑法修正案(十一)》对此类案件的限缩适用效果,并通过轻罪分流、行刑衔接等方式,为非法经营罪进一步限缩适用提出建议。
The restrictive application of the crime of illegal business operation has always been a concern in academic and practical fields. The Amendment (XI) to the Criminal Law, which came into effect on March 1, 2021, added the crime of dangerous operations. The establishment of this crime has restricted the application of the crime of illegal business operation to a certain extent in subsequent practical work. In cases of unlicensed operation of refined oil products, the impact of this restriction is particularly prominent. Focusing on cases of unlicensed operation of refined oil products, this paper sorts out and summarizes public cases before and after the implementation of the Amendment (XI) to the Criminal Law, and analyzes the qualitative issue of unlicensed operation of refined oil products from the three aspects of the pre-law norms, the protection of legal interests, and other elements of the crime description. It also discriminates between the application of the crime of illegal business operation and the crime of dangerous operations, clarifies the restrictive application effect of the Amendment (XI) to the Criminal Law on such cases, and puts forward suggestions for further restrictive application of the crime of illegal business operation through means such as diversion of minor crimes and connection between administrative enforcement and criminal justice.
[1] | 1979年《刑法》第117条规定: 违反金融、外汇、金银、工商管理法规, 投机倒把, 情节严重的, 处三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役, 可以并处、单处罚金或者没收财产[Z]. 1979. |
[2] | 陈兴良. 非法经营罪范围的扩张及其限制——以行政许可视角的考察[J]. 法学家, 2021(2): 56-71. |
[3] | 陈泽宪. 非法经营罪若干问题研究[J]. 人民检察, 2000(2): 22-24. |
[4] | 最高人民法院, 最高人民检察院, 海关总署. 打击非设关地成品油走私专题研讨会会议纪要[EB/OL]. http://www.customs.gov.cn/jsj/flgf65/gfxwj23/2696978/index.htm, 2024-04-15. |
[5] | 应急管理部等10部门. 2022年第8号公告[EB/OL]. https://www.mem.gov.cn/gk/zfxxgkpt/fdzdgknr/202211/t20221107_426077.shtml, 2024-04-01. |
[6] | 案件来源于中国法院网. 最高法发布平安中国建设第一批典型案例之三潘某某危险作业案[EB/OL]. https://www.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2021/12/id/6466259.shtml, 2024-04-15. |
[7] | 案件来源于最高人民检察院. 人民法院、人民检察院依法惩治危害生产安全犯罪典型案例高某海等危险作业案[EB/OL]. https://www.spp.gov.cn/xwfbh/dxal/202212/t20221215_595675.shtml, 2024-12-15. |
[8] | 案件来源于广东政法网. 广东省人民检察院、广东省应急管理厅联合发布10件安全生产领域刑事犯罪和公益诉讼典型案例之黎某炳、黎某展和李某某危险作业案[EB/OL]. https://www.gdzf.org.cn/zwgd/content/post_126666.html, 2024-04-15. |
[9] | 中华人民共和国国务院. 第412号令: 国务院对确需保留的行政审批项目设定行政许可的决定[EB/OL]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2008-03/28/content_1833.htm, 2024-04-15. |
[10] | 陈兴良. 违反行政许可构成非法经营罪问题研究——以郭嵘分装农药案为例[J]. 政治与法律, 2018(6): 13-25. |
[11] | 陈超然. 论非法经营罪的法益[J]. 江南大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2013, 12(1): 52-56. |
[12] | 郑勇. 非法经营罪的扩张: 原因及其对策[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2018(1): 100-110. |
[13] | 张志铭. 法律解释操作分析[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1999: 107. |
[14] | 高岚君, 岳绥元. 非法经营罪与危险作业罪辨析——《刑法修正案(十一)》对无证经营成品油的定性影响[J]. 沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 47(2): 33-39. |
[15] | 滕伟, 叶邵生, 李加玺. 《关于办理危害生产安全刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释(二)》的理解与适用[J]. 中国应用法学, 2022(6): 38-49. |