|
民间借贷中涉借据相关事实认定问题研究
|
Abstract:
民间借贷案件中,对事实的准确认定至关重要,同时也面临着不少挑战。当前,事实认定的相关法律法规尚不完善,法官面临着诸多事实认定难点。这些难点不仅包括原告提供证据的证明力大小、被告否认的构成,还涉及到胁迫事实存在性以及申请鉴定权的归属问题。为攻克难点,有必要结合对相关司法案例的深入分析,探讨并提出“经验法则”在民间借贷事实认定中的理论和实践方法,以为民事司法审判提供有价值的参考和指导。
The accurate determination of facts in private loan cases is crucial and also faces many challenges. At present, the relevant laws and regulations for the determination of facts are not yet perfect, and judges face many difficulties in the determination of facts. These difficulties include not only the plaintiff to provide evidence of the size of the evidence, the defendant denied the composition, but also involves the existence of coercion and the right to apply for appraisal of the attribution of the problem. In order to overcome the difficulties, it is necessary to combine the judicial practice of specific cases of in-depth analysis, to explore and put forward the “rule of thumb” in determining the facts of private loans in the theoretical and practical methods, in order to provide valuable reference and guidance for the civil judicial process.
[1] | 周玉文. 民间借贷合同纠纷案件事实认定中的经验法则——以借条形式表示的借款为例[J]. 上海政法学院学报, 2014, 29(3): 118-123. |
[2] | 王毓萤. 民间借贷纠纷案件裁判思路研究[J]. 中国应用法学, 2023(4): 147-156. |
[3] | 闫谦逊. 关于民间借贷纠纷审判实务若干问题的探讨[J]. 学术交流, 2012(9): 70-73. |
[4] | 徐戈博. 民间借贷纠纷中的共同债务承担——以某法院张玮与李红的借贷纠纷案为例[J]. 理财, 2023(8): 28-30. |
[5] | 刘晓春. 民间借贷适用法律的逻辑[J]. 中国金融, 2020(19): 173-174. |
[6] | 李训虎. 证明力规则检讨[J]. 法学研究, 2010(2): 156-173. |
[7] | 包冰锋. 论民事诉讼中当事人的积极否认义务[J]. 证据科学, 2015(4): 440-449. |
[8] | 王轶. 论我国合同法中的“胁迫” [J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(1): 114-120. |
[9] | 李明. 证据证明力研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国政法大学, 2011. |
[10] | 岳彩申. 民间借贷风险治理的转型及法律机制的创新[J]. 政法论丛, 2018(1): 3-13. |
[11] | 袁琳. 证明责任视角下的抗辩与否认界别[J]. 现代法学, 2016, 38(6): 184-193. |
[12] | 敖希颖. 民间借贷成本之司法衡量的类型化[J]. 法律适用, 2022, 2022(11): 38-48. |
[13] | 张也弛. 论民间借贷中借贷事实的认定[J]. 安徽警官职业学院学报, 2019, 18(2): 38-41. |