全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

多参数磁共振成像联合血清ALP、D-二聚体、FIB对前列腺癌骨转移的诊断效能分析
Analysis of the Diagnostic Efficacy of Multi-Parameter Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Serum ALP, D-Dimer, and FIB for Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis

DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.152424, PP. 900-907

Keywords: 前列腺癌骨转移,mpMRI,ALP,D-二聚体,FIB
Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis
, Multi-Parameter Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI), Alkaline Phosphatase, D-Dimer, Plasma Fibrinogen

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:多参数磁共振成像(multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, mpMRI)联合血清碱性磷酸酶(alkaline phosphatase, ALP)、D-二聚体(D-dimer, DD2)、纤维蛋白原(fibrinogen, FIB)诊断前列腺癌骨转移的效能分析。方法:对169例前列腺癌患者的临床资料进行回顾性收集和分析,根据骨扫描的检查结果辅以核磁共振,将盆腔有无骨转移的病人分为前列腺癌骨转移组80例和非骨转移组89例。所有患者在手术前都接受了MRI检查,对血清PSA、ALP、D-二聚体、FIB水平进行定量检测。对不同影像指标与前列腺癌骨转移结果之间的一致性采用Kappa一致性检验;利用单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析,评估mpMRI、ALP、D-二聚体、FIB及其他临床指标在前列腺癌骨转移诊断中的价值。利用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic, ROC)曲线对前列腺癌骨转移中纳入的mpMRI、ALP、D-二聚体、FIB及其联合指标的临床应用价值进行评价。结果:T1WI、T2WI压脂、DWI及mpMRI与前列腺癌骨转移结果比较的Kappa值分别为0.536、0.470、0.629、0.691 (P < 0.001)。与前列腺癌非骨转移组相比,骨转移组患者的血清ALP、D-二聚体、FIB水平更高(P < 0.001)。多因素Logistic回归分析表明,mpMRI、ALP、D-二聚体、FIB均是前列腺癌骨转移的独立危险因素(P < 0.05)。联合指标水平最佳,其次为单一指标D-二聚体、mpMRI、ALP、FIB,均体现了较好的诊断价值(P < 0.05)。结论:mpMRI、ALP、D-二聚体、FIB均对前列腺癌骨转移有一定诊断效能,将这些指标联合后能进一步提升诊断价值,在临床实践考虑推广使用。
Objective: To analyze the efficacy of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) combined with serum ALP, D-dimer, and FIB in the diagnosis of bone metastasis in prostate cancer. Methods: A retrospective collection and analysis of clinical data from 169 prostate cancer patients were conducted. Based on the results of bone scans supplemented by MRI, patients with or without pelvic bone metastasis were divided into the prostate cancer bone metastasis group (80 cases) and the non-bone metastasis group (89 cases). All patients underwent MRI examination prior to surgery, and serum levels of PSA, ALP, D-dimer, and FIB were quantitatively measured. Kappa consistency tests were used to analyze the agreement between different imaging indicators and the results of prostate cancer bone metastasis. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the value of mpMRI, ALP, D-dimer, FIB, and other clinical indicators in the diagnosis of prostate cancer bone metastasis. The clinical application value of mpMRI, ALP, D-dimer, FIB, and their combined indicators in diagnosing prostate cancer bone metastasis was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: The Kappa values comparing T1WI, T2WI fat suppression, DWI, and mpMRI with the results of prostate cancer bone metastasis were 0.536, 0.470, 0.629, and 0.691, respectively (P < 0.001). Compared to the non-bone metastasis group, the serum levels of ALP, D-dimer, and FIB in the bone metastasis group were significantly higher (P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that mpMRI, ALP, D-dimer, and FIB are independent risk factors for prostate

References

[1]  Nishimura, K. (2023) Management of Bone Metastasis in Prostate Cancer. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, 41, 317-326.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-023-01435-w
[2]  Turpin, A., Girard, E., Baillet, C., Pasquier, D., Olivier, J., Villers, A., et al. (2020) Imaging for Metastasis in Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Literature. Frontiers in Oncology, 10, Article 55.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00055
[3]  周海振, 杜娟娟, 同志超, 等. 四肢长骨转移瘤诊断和外科治疗分析[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2019, 24(1): 17-23.
https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2019.01.004
[4]  Selvaraj, V. (2020) Alkaline Phosphatase: Structure, Expression and Its Function in Bone Mineralization. Gene, 754, Article ID: 144855.
[5]  Peng, C., Juan, C., Mao, W., et al. (2022) Retrospective Analysis of Risk Factors for Bone Metastasis in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 26, 3832-3839.
[6]  Çalışkan, S. and Sungur, M. (2017) Fibrinogen and D-Dimer Levels in Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Results. Prostate International, 5, 110-112.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2017.05.001
[7]  Wang, F. and Xing, N. (2021) Systemic Coagulation Markers Especially Fibrinogen Are Closely Associated with the Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer in Patients Who Underwent Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy. Disease Markers, 2021, Article ID: 8899994.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8899994
[8]  Parker, C., Castro, E., Fizazi, K., Heidenreich, A., Ost, P., Procopio, G., et al. (2020) Prostate Cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-Up. Annals of Oncology, 31, 1119-1134.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.011
[9]  前列腺癌骨转移多学科诊疗专家共识(2020版) [J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2020, 47(7): 479-486.
[10]  Pierorazio, P.M., Walsh, P.C., Partin, A.W. and Epstein, J.I. (2013) Prognostic Gleason Grade Grouping: Data Based on the Modified Gleason Scoring System. BJU International, 111, 753-760.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11611.x
[11]  Fu, Z.T., Guo, X.L., Zhang, S.W., et al. (2020) Statistical Analysis of Incidence and Mortality of Prostate Cancer in China, 2015. Chinese Journal of Oncology, 42, 718⁃722.
[12]  刘想, 崔应谱, 韩超, 等. 基于深度学习自动分割模型的DWI影像组学模型预测前列腺癌盆腔骨转移[J]. 放射学实践, 2021, 36(12): 1563-1570.
https://doi.org/10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2021.12.020
[13]  郭阳, 尹桂秀. ADC、PSA联合Gleason评分预测前列腺癌骨转移的价值[J]. 中华男科学杂志, 2020, 26(3): 280-284.
https://doi.org/10.13263/j.cnki.nja.2020.03.017
[14]  宋伟, 李宇, 康飞, 等. 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT与99Tcm-MDP骨扫描诊断前列腺癌骨转移的比较[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2018, 39(10): 766-770.
https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2018.10.011
[15]  胡珍国, 乐官明, 邱思煌. 关于骨扫描和MRI诊断前列腺癌骨转移的临床价值探讨[J]. 现代医用影像学, 2022, 31(6): 1051-1053.
[16]  王玮玮, 陈思敏, 王奕阳, 等. 磁共振动态对比增强联合血清TSGF、ICTP、ALP对骨肿瘤良恶性鉴别和骨恶性肿瘤治疗后的疗效评估价值[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2023, 23(23): 4516-4520.
https://doi.org/10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2023.23.023
[17]  Skok, K., Maver, U., Gradišnik, L., Kozar, N., Takač, I. and Arko, D. (2019) Endometrial Cancer and Its Cell Lines. Molecular Biology Reports, 47, 1399-1411.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-019-05226-3
[18]  李伟, 张军泽. 外周凝血指标及临床因素对初诊前列腺癌患者骨转移的预测价值[J]. 血栓与止血学, 2022, 28(3): 370-372, 375.
[19]  李轩宇, 郝林, 韩从辉. FIB、D-二聚体及血清CysC对前列腺癌骨转移的诊断价值[J]. 中国医药导报, 2022, 19(14): 97-100, 120.
https://doi.org/10.20047/j.issn1673-7210.2022.14.019
[20]  Yu, Z., Yuan, M. and Chen, G. (2023) The Clinical Association between Coagulation Indexes, Platelet-Related Parameters, and Bone Metastasis of Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer. European Journal of Medical Research, 28, Article No. 587.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01562-0
[21]  张鹏, 李鑫钊, 梁清, 等. 血浆纤维蛋白原、前列腺特异性抗原密度与前列腺癌骨转移关系研究[J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(17): 111-114.
https://doi.org/10.20047/j.issn1673-7210.2023.17.25
[22]  Cong, X., Li, S., Zhang, Y., Zhu, Z., Wang, Y., Song, S., et al. (2019) The Combination of Preoperative Fibrinogen and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio Is a Predictive Prognostic Factor in Esophagogastric Junction and Upper Gastric Cancer. Journal of Cancer, 10, 5518-5526.
https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.31162

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133