全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection Following Cesarean Section in a Tertiary Care Hospital

DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2025.152023, PP. 261-271

Keywords: Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Cesarean Section, Risk Factors

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background: Cesarean sections have become increasingly prevalent in both developed and developing nations. Nevertheless, postoperative complications, including surgical site infections (SSIs), remain a substantial concern that contributes to heightened morbidity and mortality. This study is designed to evaluate the frequency and key determining factors associated with surgical site infections following cesarean section procedures in a tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh. Materials and Methods: This observational cross-sectional study, conducted at the Gynecology Department of Dhaka Medical College Hospital, involved 100 patients aged 15 - 45 who had cesarean deliveries. Data was collected during hospitalization and post-discharge and analyzed to determine the prevalence and relationship between socio-demographic characteristics and surgical site infection. Results: Among the study participants, 14% developed surgical site infections following cesarean operations. More than half of these patients were under the age of 25, with a mean age of 24.45 ± 4.44 years. Surgical site infections were more prevalent in individuals over 30 years old (P-value < 0.001), illiterate women (P-value 0.004), obese women (P-value 0.038), and women with anemia (P-value < 0.001). Maintaining proper hygiene (P-value 0.001), having regular menstrual cycles (P-value 0.002), and attending antenatal check-ups (P-value 0.039) can reduce the risk of infections. The primary reasons for undergoing a cesarean section included a history of previous cesarean deliveries, fetal distress, breech presentation, pre-eclampsia, placenta previa, and twin pregnancies. Notably, 94% of participants delivered a live baby, while 6% sadly experienced stillbirth. Conclusion: Post-cesarean surgical site infections are notably prevalent among the participants in this study. Several risk factors have been identified, including age, body mass index (BMI), socioeconomic status, anemia, preterm delivery, personal hygiene practices, regular menstrual cycles, and adherence to antenatal check-ups. The implementation of an effective awareness program, coupled with updated antibiotic protocols, is crucial for significantly reducing the incidence of these infections.

References

[1]  Betran, A.P., Ye, J., Moller, A., Souza, J.P. and Zhang, J. (2021) Trends and Projections of Caesarean Section Rates: Global and Regional Estimates. BMJ Global Health, 6, e005671.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671
[2]  Ahmmed, F., Manik, M.M.R. and Hossain, M.J. (2021) Caesarian Section (CS) Delivery in Bangladesh: A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Study. PLOS ONE, 16, e0254777.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254777
[3]  Streatfield, P. and El Arifeen, S. (2010) Bangladesh Maternal Mortality and Health Care Survey 2010. NIPORT, MEASURE Evaluation, Dhaka.
[4]  Del Monte, M.C.C. and Pinto Neto, A.M. (2010) Postdischarge Surveillance Following Cesarean Section: The Incidence of Surgical Site Infection and Associated Factors. American Journal of Infection Control, 38, 467-472.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2009.10.008
[5]  Ayala, D., Tolossa, T., Markos, J. and Yilma, M.T. (2021) Magnitude and Factors Associated with Surgical Site Infection among Mothers Underwent Cesarean Delivery in Nekemte Town Public Hospitals, Western Ethiopia. PLOS ONE, 16, e0250736.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250736
[6]  Harzif, A.K., Wicaksono, M.D., Kallista, A., Emeraldi, M. and Pratama, G. (2020) Overview of Risk Factor and Bacterial Pattern in Patient with Surgical Site Infection after Caesarean Section in Ciptomangunkusumo Hospital from 2016 to 2018. Infection Prevention in Practice, 2, Article 100090.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2020.100090
[7]  Zuarez-Easton, S., Zafran, N., Garmi, G. and Salim, R. (2017) Postcesarean Wound Infection: Prevalence, Impact, Prevention, and Management Challenges. International Journal of Womens Health, 9, 81-88.
https://doi.org/10.2147/ijwh.s98876
[8]  Shrestha, S., Shrestha, R., Shrestha, B. and Dongol, A. (2015) Incidence and Risk Factors of Surgical Site Infection Following Cesarean Section at Dhulikhel Hospital. Kathmandu University Medical Journal, 12, 113-116.
https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v12i2.13656
[9]  Jido, T. and Garba, I. (2012) Surgical-Site Infection Following Cesarean Section in Kano, Nigeria. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research, 2, 33-36.
https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.96934
[10]  Mpogoro, F.J., Mshana, S.E., Mirambo, M.M., Kidenya, B.R., Gumodoka, B. and Imirzalioglu, C. (2014) Incidence and Predictors of Surgical Site Infections Following Caesarean Sections at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, 3, Article No. 25.
https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-3-25
[11]  Lakhan, P., Doherty, J., Jones, M. and Clements, A. (2010) A Systematic Review of Maternal Intrinsic Risk Factors Associated with Surgical Site Infection Following Caesarean Sections. Healthcare infection, 15, 35-41.
https://doi.org/10.1071/hi10001
[12]  Li, L. and Cui, H. (2021) The Risk Factors and Care Measures of Surgical Site Infection after Cesarean Section in China: A Retrospective Analysis. BMC Surgery, 21, Article No. 248.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01154-x
[13]  Khatun, M., Sultana, S., Khandkar, H.H., Hamid, T. and Hasan, M.N. (2012) Effects of Ceftriaxone and Gentamicin for Antibiotic Prophylaxis of Cesarean Section. Dinajpur Medical College Journal, 5, 52-55.
[14]  Webster, J. (1988) Post‐Caesarean Wound Infection: A Review of the Risk Factors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 28, 201-207.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.1988.tb01664.x
[15]  Starling, C.E.F., Couto, B.R.G.M. and Pinheiro, S.M.C. (1997) Applying the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Nosocomial Surveillance System Methods in Brazilian Hospitals. American Journal of Infection Control, 25, 303-311.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-6553(97)90022-5
[16]  Eltahawy, A.T.A., Mokhtar, A.A., Khalaf, R.M.F. and Bahnassy, A.A. (1992) Postoperative Wound Infection at a University Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Hospital Infection, 21, 79-83.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6701(92)90156-g
[17]  Wloch, C., Wilson, J., Lamagni, T., Harrington, P., Charlett, A. and Sheridan, E. (2012) Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection Following Caesarean Section in England: Results from a Multicentre Cohort Study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 119, 1324-1333.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03452.x
[18]  Yalçin, A.N., Bakir, M., Bakici, Z., Dökmeta̧s, I. and Sabir, N. (1995) Postoperative Wound Infections. Journal of Hospital Infection, 29, 305-309.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6701(95)90278-3
[19]  Raymond, D.P., Pelletier, S.J., Crabtree, T.D., Schulman, A.M., Pruett, T.L. and Sawyer, R.G. (2001) Surgical Infection and the Aging Population. The American Surgeon, 67, 827-833.
https://doi.org/10.1177/000313480106700903
[20]  Zejnullahu, V.A., Isjanovska, R., Sejfija, Z. and Zejnullahu, V.A. (2019) Surgical Site Infections after Cesarean Sections at the University Clinical Center of Kosovo: Rates, Microbiological Profile and Risk Factors. BMC Infectious Diseases, 19, Article No. 752.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4383-7
[21]  Myles, T. (2002) Obesity as an Independent Risk Factor for Infectious Morbidity in Patients Who Undergo Cesarean Delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 100, 959-964.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02323-2
[22]  Tran, T.S., Jamulitrat, S., Chongsuvivatwong, V. and Geater, A. (2000) Risk Factors for Postcesarean Surgical Site Infection. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 95, 367-371.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-200003000-00011
[23]  Pignon, A. and Truslove, T. (2013) Obesity, Pregnancy Outcomes and Cesarean Section: A Structured Review of the Combined Literature. Evidence Based Midwifery Journal, 11, 132-137.
[24]  Killian, C.A., Graffunder, E.M., Vinciguerra, T.J. and Venezia, R.A. (2001) Risk Factors for Surgical-Site Infections Following Cesarean Section. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 22, 613-617.
https://doi.org/10.1086/501831
[25]  Munjanja, S.P., Seeras, R.C. and Masona, D. (1987) Vaginal Delivery Following Cesarean Section: A Prospective Study without Radiological Pelvimetry. The Central African Journal of Medicine, 33, 204-208.
[26]  Suonio, S., Saarikoski, S., Vohlonen, I. and Kauhanen, O. (1989) Risk Factors for Fever, Endometritis and Wound Infection after Abdominal Delivery. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 29, 135-142.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(89)90843-6
[27]  King, C. (1989) Infection Following Cesarean Section: A Study of the Literature and Cases Emphasising Prevention. The Central African Journal of Medicine, 35, 556-570.
[28]  Beard, R.W. and Sharp, F. (1985) Preterm Labour and Its Consequences. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 249-262.
[29]  Kawakita, T. and Landy, H.J. (2017) Surgical Site Infections after Cesarean Delivery: Epidemiology, Prevention and Treatment. Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology, 3, Article No. 12.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-017-0051-3

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133