|
新质生产力评价指标体系的构建及统计度量
|
Abstract:
新质生产力不仅是推动经济高质量发展的内在要求,也是实现社会主义现代化强国战略目标的重要途径,其评价指标体系的构建成为衡量国家和地区创新能力、推动经济高质量发展的关键环节。本文基于新质生产力的构成要素和发展动力:数字经济、科技创新、绿色发展三个维度构建了新质生产力评价指标体系,并采用熵权-TOPSIS法测度了我国2022年30个省市新质生产力发展水平。结果发现:新质生产力发展水平存在地区差异,东部沿海地区高于中西部地区;不同地区在不同领域的发展并不均衡。
New quality productivity is not only an intrinsic requirement to promote the high-quality development of economy, but also an important way to realize the strategic goal of socialist modernization and power, and the construction of its evaluation index system has become a key link to measure the innovation ability of countries and regions and promote high-quality economic development. Based on the three dimensions of the components and development drivers of new quality productivity: digital economy, scientific and technological innovation, and green development, this paper constructs an evaluation index system of new quality productivity and uses the entropy weight-TOPSIS method to measure the development level of new quality productivity in 30 provinces and cities in China in 2022. The results found that there are regional differences in the development level of new quality productivity, with the eastern coastal region being higher than the central and western regions; the development of different regions in different areas is not balanced.
[1] | 曹东勃, 蔡煜. 新质生产力指标体系构建研究[J]. 教学与研究, 2024(4): 50-62. |
[2] | 王珏, 王荣基. 新质生产力: 指标构建与时空演进[J]. 西安财经大学学报, 2024, 37(1): 31-47. |
[3] | 韩文龙, 张瑞生, 赵峰. 新质生产力水平测算与中国经济增长新动能[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(6): 5-25. |
[4] | 卢江, 郭子昂, 王煜萍. 新质生产力发展水平、区域差异与提升路径[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 30(3): 1-17. |
[5] | 孙丽伟, 郭俊华. 新质生产力评价指标体系构建与实证测度[J]. 统计与决策, 2024, 40(9): 5-11. |
[6] | 蒋永穆, 乔张媛. 新质生产力发展评价指标体系构建[J]. 经济体制改革, 2024(3): 5-15. |
[7] | 李光勤, 李梦娇. 中国省域新质生产力水平评价、空间格局及其演化特征[J]. 经济地理, 2024, 44(8): 116-125. |