全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

长三角生态绿色一体化背景下皖江城市带生态补偿研究
Research on Ecological Compensation in the Urban Belt of Wanjiang River under the Background of Ecological Green Integration in the Yangtze River Delta

DOI: 10.12677/sd.2025.152036, PP. 12-22

Keywords: 皖江城市带,生态补偿,对口协作,生态系统服务价值,生态绿色一体化
The Urban Belt of Wanjiang River
, Ecological Compensation, Counterpart Cooperation, Ecosystem Service Value, Ecological Green Integration

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

皖江城市带是长三角区域的腹地和生态屏障,在长三角区域生态环境保护中起着关键作用。本文基于长三角生态绿色一体化的背景,运用生态系统服务价值评价方法,测算2015~2020年长三角区域的生态服务价值,确定皖江城市带8个城市的生态补偿优先级和生态补偿标准。结果显示,2020年长三角区域的生态服务价值为28150.21亿元,比2015年下降5.14%。其中,皖江城市带降幅最小,为3.04%。在长三角区域中,池州市、宣城市、安庆市、铜陵市和滁州市的生态优先级和生态补偿金额最高。马鞍山市和芜湖市的位次也排在前列,只有合肥市处在中等水平。最后,提出在长三角区域生态环境保护协作小组的指导下,从产业协作、科技协作和金融协作三方面开展对口协作式生态补偿,推动皖江城市带的生态环境保护工作。
The urban belt of Wanjiang River is the hinterland and ecological barrier of the Yangtze River Delta region, playing a crucial role in the ecological environment protection of the Yangtze River Delta. Based on the background of the ecological and green integration of the Yangtze River Delta and the ecosystem service value evaluation method, this paper calculates the ecological service value of the Yangtze River Delta region from 2015 to 2020 and determines the priority and standards of ecological compensation for the eight cities in the urban belt of Wanjiang River. The results show that the ecological service value of the Yangtze River Delta region in 2020 was 28150.21 billion yuan, a decrease of 5.14% compared with 2015. Among them, the Wanjiang River urban belt had the smallest decline, at 3.04%. In the Yangtze River Delta region, Chizhou City, Xuancheng City, Anqing City, Tongling City and Chuzhou City had the highest ecological priority and ecological compensation amount. Ma’anshan City and Wuhu City also ranked among the top, while Hefei City was at a medium level. Finally, under the guidance of the Yangtze River Delta regional ecological and environmental protection cooperation group, it is proposed to carry out the matching cooperative ecological compensation from the three aspects of industrial cooperation, scientific and technological cooperation and financial cooperation, so as to promote the ecological and environmental protection work in the urban belt of Wanjiang River.

References

[1]  Allen, A.O. and Feddema, J.J. (1996) Wetland Loss and Substitution by the Section 404 Permit Program in Southern California, Usa. Environmental Management, 20, 263-274.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01204011
[2]  毛显强, 钟瑜, 张胜. 生态补偿的理论探讨[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2002, 12(4): 38-41.
[3]  赵雪雁, 李巍, 王学良. 生态补偿研究中的几个关键问题[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2012, 22(2): 1-7.
[4]  张海鹏. 森林生态效益补偿制度的完善策略[J]. 重庆社会科学, 2018(5): 45-51.
[5]  王会, 杨光, 程宝栋. 长三角地区省级流域生态补偿制度研究[J]. 环境保护, 2020, 48(20): 24-30.
[6]  楚道文. 流域横向生态补偿制度的三重进阶[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2023, 37(7): 197-202.
[7]  饶清华, 林秀珠, 陈芳, 等. 基于排污量分配的流域生态补偿标准研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(6): 2828-2834.
[8]  官冬杰, 姜亚楠, 严聆云, 等. 基于生态足迹视角的长江流域生态补偿额度测算[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(20): 8169-8183.
[9]  Muñoz-Piña, C., Guevara, A., Torres, J.M. and Braña, J. (2008) Paying for the Hydrological Services of Mexico’s Forests: Analysis, Negotiations and Results. Ecological Economics, 65, 725-736.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.031
[10]  张伊华. 基于机会成本法和生态系统服务价值核算的水资源生态补偿标准研究——以黄河流域为例[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2023, 42(5): 108-114.
[11]  袁广达. 环境成本视角的跨界流域生态补偿标准量化研究[J]. 会计研究, 2022(6): 16-31.
[12]  赵旭, 池辰, 何伟军. 基于选择实验法的三峡屏障区居民生态补偿支付意愿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(1): 101-112.
[13]  Akter, S. (2020) Social Cohesion and Willingness to Pay for Cyclone Risk Reduction: The Case for the Coastal Embankment Improvement Project in Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 48, Article ID: 101579.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101579
[14]  冯凌, 郭嘉欣, 王灵恩. 旅游生态补偿的市场化路径及其理论解析[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(9): 1816-1826.
[15]  李倩娜, 唐洪松, 胡艳. 沱江流域生态补偿模式演变、实践困境及优化对策[J]. 环境保护, 2022, 50(19): 24-27.
[16]  汪芳琳. 皖江区域生物多样性保护中生态补偿策略——以安徽池州市为例[J]. 广东石油化工学院学报, 2015, 25(1): 81-85.
[17]  范树平, 余波平, 朱云涛, 等. 合肥都市圈耕地资源生态价值评估及其补偿标准研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2024(11): 1-16.
[18]  谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254.
[19]  吴中全. 生态红线区生态补偿机制研究——以重庆市为例[D]: [博士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2021.
[20]  王女杰, 刘建, 吴大千, 等. 基于生态系统服务价值的区域生态补偿——以山东省为例[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(23): 6646-6653.
[21]  许丽丽, 李宝林, 袁烨城, 等. 基于生态系统服务价值评估的我国集中连片重点贫困区生态补偿研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2016, 18(3): 286-297.
[22]  符艺文. 绿色金融对长江流域生态系统服务价值的影响效应研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 淮南: 安徽理工大学, 2024.
[23]  谭昭昭, 陈毓遒, 丁憬枫, 等. 浙江东部沿海城市土地利用模拟及生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2777-2787.
[24]  陈燕, 谭堰琴, 邱晓敏, 等. 供需关系下长三角城市群生态系统服务空间流转[J]. 华侨大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 43(3): 403-411.
[25]  刘旭. 以产业生态化和生态产业化推进海南乡村振兴[J]. 南海学刊, 2024, 10(2): 80-90.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133