Periprosthetic fracture of femur is a common and complex complication after joint replacement. With the increase of operation volume, its incidence is increasing year by year. The treatment of this fracture is affected by many factors, including fracture type, prosthesis stability, patient age and comorbidities, and individualized treatment strategy is needed. In recent years, the internal fixation technology and prosthetic revision technology have made significant progress in surgical treatment, such as locking steel plate, titanium cable and bridge combined internal fixation system and other new technologies have effectively improved the treatment effect. In addition, the application of new materials and 3D printing technology, as well as the optimization of multidisciplinary cooperation mode, also provide new ideas for the treatment of complex fractures. However, there are still some problems such as inaccurate diagnosis, difficult choice of treatment options and high incidence of postoperative complications. In the future, technological innovation, the introduction of artificial intelligence and big data, and the further development of personalized treatment will bring more possibilities to improve the prognosis and quality of life of patients. This study summarizes the relevant research results and prospects the future development direction, providing references for clinical practice and subsequent research.
References
[1]
Zhu, L.Q., Zhao, S.J., Xie, L., et al. (2023) Progress in the Study of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures. InternationalJournalofOrthopaedics, 44, 269-273.
[2]
Huang, J. and Peng, H. (2022) Advances in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Fractures of the Vancouver B Femur. BiologicalOrthopaedicMaterialsandClinicalResearch, 19, 78-81.
[3]
Müller, K., Zeynalova, S., Fakler, J.K.M., Kleber, C., Roth, A. and Osterhoff, G. (2024) Risk Factors for Mortality in Periprosthetic Femur Fractures about the Hip—A Retrospective Analysis. InternationalOrthopaedics, 49, 211-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06346-7
[4]
Iwata, M., Takegami, Y., Tokutake, K., Kurokawa, H., Takami, H., Terasawa, S., et al. (2024) Predictive Factors for Reoperation after Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture: A Retrospective Multicenter (TRON) Study. JournalofOrthopaedicScience, 29, 1445-1450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2023.11.016
[5]
Haraguchi, T., Kume, S., Jimbo, K., Hiraoka, K. and Okawa, T. (2024) Occult Acetabular Fracture Associated with Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture (Vancouver Type B3) Following Hemiarthroplasty in an Elderly Patient: A Case Report. Cureus, 16, 720-727. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72071
[6]
Lamb, J.N., Evans, J.T., Relton, S., Whitehouse, M.R., Wilkinson, J.M. and Pandit, H. (2024) The Incidence of Postoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Following Total Hip Replacement: An Analysis of UK National Joint Registry and Hospital Episodes Statistics Data. PLOSMedicine, 21, e1004462. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004462
[7]
Han, S., Frangie, R., Lanfermeijer, N.D., Gold, J.E., Ismaily, S.K., Yoo, A., et al. (2024) Is Suture-Based Cerclage Biomechanically Superior to Traditional Metallic Cerclage for Fixation of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Matched Pair Cadaveric Study. ClinicalBiomechanics, 120, Article ID: 106362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106362
[8]
Cha, L., Wu, X.T., Zhou, K.H., et al. (2024) Efficacy Analysis of New Femoral Locking Plate Combined with Titanium Cable Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Vancouver B1 Femoral Periprosthetic Fracture. ChineseJournalof Bone and Joint Injury, 39, 790-793.
[9]
Qiu, F.P., Wang, Z.G., Wei, X.J., et al. (2022) Locking Plate Combined with Titanium Cable Internal Fixation for Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture. ChineseJournalofOrthopaedicSurgery, 30, 1339-1341.
[10]
Zhang, H.P. (2020) Efficacy Analysis of Biological Long Stem Femoral Prosthesis in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures. Shihezi University.
[11]
Elpatijan Mahemuti (2020) Wagner SL Revision Handle for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Vancouver B2 and B3 Hip Arthroplasty. Xinjiang Medical University.
[12]
Xu, Y.W., Zheng, Y., Shi, Z., et al. (2022) Application of Double Allograft Cortical Bone Plate “Internal Splint” Support Combined with Embracing Device Internal Fixation in the Operation of Vancouver B3 Femoral Periprosthetic Fracture. Chinese Journalof Bone and Joint Injury, 37, 1296-1298.
[13]
Chen, Z.J., Guo, J.M., Liu, J., et al. (2021) Open Reduction with Titanium Cable Locking Plate for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures. JournalofClinicalOrthopaedics, 24, 606-607.
[14]
Qin, J. (2022) Finite Element Analysis and Clinical Study of Bridging Combined Internal Fixation System in the Treatment of Vancouver Type B Fracture around Femoral Prosthesis. Kunming Medical University.
[15]
Zhu, M., Hu, X.Y., Zhao, T.T., et al. (2024) Risk Factors and Prediction Model of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Elderly. Journalof Local Interpretation Surgery, 33, 157-161.
[16]
Wang, Y.B., Zeng, Z.P. and Zheng, W.J. (2021) Application of Bridging Combined Internal Fixation System in Periprosthetic Fracture of Artificial Hip. HainanMedicalJournal, 32, 2001-2003.
[17]
Pan, R.N., Tang, C.J., Li, F., et al. (2023) Closed Reduction and Minimally Invasive Locking Plate Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Elderly Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures. ChineseJournalof Bone and Joint Injury, 38, 1071-1073.
[18]
Xia, Q., Liu, C.W., Wang, H.Y., et al. (2024) Double Plate Internal Fixation Combined with Bone Graft in the Treatment of Old Periprosthetic Fracture of Femur after TKA. Journalof Practical Orthopaedics, 30, 256-260.
[19]
Prough, H. and Mesko, D. (2024) Periprosthetic Femur Fracture through a Large Osteolytic Lesion after Total Knee Arthroplasty. ArthroplastyToday, 30, Article ID: 101446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2024.101446
[20]
Suo, H.Q. (2020) Treatment and Efficacy Analysis of Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture after Artificial Hip Arthroplasty. Jilin University.
