全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Clinical Effect Analysis of Negative Pressure Chest Drainage in Patients after Two-Port Thoracoscopic Valve Surgery

DOI: 10.4236/ns.2025.172002, PP. 7-12

Keywords: Negative Pressure, Chest Drainage, Two-Port Thoracoscopy, Valve Surgery, Cardiac Surgery

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Objective: This study aims to investigate the drainage effect and clinical outcomes of negative pressure chest drainage in patients after two-port thoracoscopic valve surgery, comparing the differences in postoperative pain, hospital stay, and other factors between the negative pressure group and the control group. Methods: This study is a prospective controlled trial that selected patients undergoing two-port thoracoscopic valve surgery at a certain hospital from January 2019 to December 2024. Patients were randomly assigned to the control group and the negative pressure group using a random number table method. The control group consisted of 30 patients (20 males, 10 females, mean age 42.03 ± 12.89 years), and the negative pressure group consisted of 35 patients (26 males, 9 females, mean age 41.84 ± 11.83 years). The control group received traditional chest drainage, while the negative pressure group received negative pressure chest drainage. Postoperative pain scores, hospital stay, drainage time, number of tube blockages, and incidences of pneumothorax or subcutaneous emphysema were recorded and statistically analyzed. Results: The negative pressure group had a significantly shorter postoperative drainage time compared to the control group (49.09 ± 11.99 hours vs. 79.10 ± 7.32 hours, P < 0.001). The postoperative pain score was lower in the negative pressure group (4.49 ± 1.27 vs. 7.03 ± 0.85, P < 0.001), and the hospital stay was significantly shorter (9.83 ± 1.69 days vs. 14.73 ± 2.32 days, P < 0.001). The incidence of pneumothorax or subcutaneous emphysema was significantly lower in the negative pressure group than in the control group (14.29% vs. 56.67%, P = 0.0003). Conclusion: The application of negative pressure chest drainage in patients after two-port thoracoscopic valve surgery can effectively reduce postoperative pain, shorten hospital stay, and lower the incidence of tube blockage and pneumothorax, demonstrating good clinical outcomes.

References

[1]  Light, R.W. and Lee, Y.C. (2020) Pleural Diseases: Advances in Diagnosis and Management. Chest, 158, 178-188.
[2]  Zhang, Y., et al. (2021) The Role of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Mitral Valve Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, 33, 709-717.
[3]  Sahn, S.A. and Heffner, J.E. (2020) The Pleural Effusion: Diagnosis and Management. New England Journal of Medicine, 382, 90-92.
[4]  Jones, R.L. and Zong, Y. (2022) Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Applications. Journal of Wound Care, 31, 120-127.
[5]  Chen, H., et al. (2023) Efficacy of Negative Pressure Drainage in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Me-ta-Analysis. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 63, ezad123.
[6]  Rivas, M., et al. (2022) Novel Approaches to Drainage in Thoracic Surgery: A Review of Clinical Outcomes. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 113, 1063-1070.
[7]  Hwang, J.H. and Na, S.J. (2021) Pain Assessment in Thoracic Surgery: A Review of Current Practices. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 13, 102-110.
[8]  Al-Benna, S., et al. (2022) Postoperative Length of Stay in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 62, ezac234.
[9]  Choi, H.Y., et al. (2023) The Impact of Drainage Techniques on Postoperative Recovery in Thoracic Surgery: A Comparative Study. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 115, 781-788.
[10]  Mitsumori, M. and Yamaguchi, K. (2021) Management of Complications in Thoracic Drainage: Insights from Clinical Practice. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 16, 1234-1242.
[11]  Tschöpe, C., et al. (2023) Complications after Mitral Valve Surgery: A Comprehensive Review. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 16, e008300.
[12]  Li, X., Zhang, Y. and Wang, Z. (2022) Effectiveness of Negative Pressure Drainage in Thoracoscopic Heart Valve Surgery. Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 37, 1234-1240.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.16327
[13]  Chen, J., Liu, H. and Zhao, M. (2023) Postoperative Pain Management in Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison of Negative Pressure Drainage and Traditional Drainage Systems. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 136, 650-657.
[14]  Smith, R. and Johnson, L. (2021) The Role of Drainage Systems in Postoperative Recovery: A Systematic Review. Surgical Innovation, 28, 335-341.
[15]  Xu, T. and Wang, H. (2020) A Randomized Controlled Trial of Drainage Techniques in Cardiac Surgery: Implications for Patient Outcomes. International Journal of Cardiology, 298, 163-170.
[16]  Zhang, Q., Li, Z. and Zhang, Y. (2023) The Impact of Drainage Techniques on Postoperative Complications in Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 15, 45-52.
[17]  Yang, F. and Liu, Y. (2022) Complications Associated with Chest Drainage after Cardiac Surgery: A Review of Current Evidence. European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 61, 364-370.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133